Can be aircraft, ground, or naval. Any country, any time period.
Hard to pick between these two.
just look at this adorable little piece of shit
I've lost gallons to Goblins
>>64703862Looks like a reject from that old video game "Battletanx: Global Assault."
>>64703856>redditslop
>>64703862You want a badly-designed tank? Here's one that can cripple the driver just through regular operation.
>>64703859What's wrong with them?
>>64703856I hate goblins so much it's unreal.
>>64703903 Bad deck design.
>>64703883>the seat How does a seat become dangerous upon operation? Fuckin bongineering
>>64703883>can cripple the driver just through regular operationThat's pretty much every soviet tank.
>>64704019Wouldn't be the first time the Brits had trouble with crew comfort.https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/26/british-army-halts-ajax-armoured-vehicle-training-noise-vibrations-soldiers-ill
>>64704019>How does a seat become dangerous upon operation?Su-34 says hello.
>>64703856BMP-2 has to be a contender, it's like it was intentionally designed to turn the troops it's transporting into charcoal
>>64704192I'll defend the BMP series' fuel tanks for a couple reasons: anything thats going to be able to get to the central tank, rupture it and ignite the fuel is almost certainly going to have fucked the guys sitting around it already, so its really just an expedient cremation feature of the vehicle. As far as the rear tanks, those were normally used for longer transit periods, they could resist rifle caliber AP rounds and if someone is shooting the back of your APC with an autocannon you have bigger immediate survivability issues
>>64703856If only she didnt have that fucking voice
