Which is the best way of evacuating multiple casualties on the battlefield?
>>64724373Have multiple rescuers.That's still neat though.
>>64724373Isekai
>>64724373rollhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0B2vRyfhLw
>>64724373Just leave them there to die and cube them later
>>64724373Where is this video from please tell, sauce sauce give me sauce please
What if there are three wounded?
>>64724373What kind of chinese bullshit is this? Is this just made up bs to impress higher ups?CASEVAC should be speedy. From cover to cover. Not some snail paced "tactic"
>>64724373Winning the firefight and getting a casevac platform to show up
>>64724373tunnel is optimal but few soldiers above earth have the mole-like digability needed to effect a swift battle tunnel extraction
>>64724373what's happening in this webm? I can't see anything because of the smoke.
>>64725895Have you ever had to drag a fully laden casaulty 100 meters? how about 3km with the shitty handles on a skedco with a ruck on and carrying his ruck shit blows fucking balls and is slow as fuck
>>64725142hook the third casualty to the unconscious man's gear, the first man drags the first casualty while carrying the second casualty, while the second casualty drags the third casualty.
>>64724373with a vehicle preferably helicopter
>>64724373
>>64728158Theres no such thing as winning a firefight, it just means artillery is on the way. If they can't move themselves, time to get the fuck out
>>64724373Couldn't resist myself.
>>64728293Yes i have.I worded it wrong. What I meant that you need to evac speedily to a cover and then you can continue the "slow evac"
