According to open-source intelligence, 2025 became a record-low year for Russian military equipment losses
>>64732354If this infographic had chinese dirtbikes and donkeys it would be record highs though
Grim. Now let's see personnel.
>>64732354That is still a small army's worth of tanks and IFVs lost. Christ, what a bloodbath.
They have less things to lose now. Now show in percentage.
>>64732354not for donkeys, horses, ladas, and golf carts
>>64732358According to Ukraine Russian losses for the year were 418k. This seems pretty high, but even half that is horrendous.
>>64732365>built-in coffin
>>64732354It would be very interesting if we could get a per capita comparison of comparable Russian vs Nork equipment losses. I strongly suspect that Nork equipment losses are significantly less (proportionately) than equivalent Russian systems despite some Nork systems (Koksans and Bulsae) being specifically hunted down. Keep in mind that even if the operators were identical in skill you would see less Nork losses due to a longer range (Koksans, 240/300mm MLRS) but i think the losses will be much more disproportionate than mere range would tend to indicate. While the systems are different enough (Koksans appear to be tougher than Russian SP guns and Bulsae has no Russian equivalent) to account for some disproportionate results the numbers for TELs and heavy MLRS systems should be interesting; the latter two don't have enough of a range advantage for it to be all that meaningful.>>64732365>>64732370Grad ammo box right?>Image: Kim family personally planting trees at their Whitehouse sized SMO memorial
>>64732354> <300 total arty deathHuh?
>>647324551) It's only documented destructions, there are additional undocumented ones2) Ukraine doesn't have a lot of weapons that are great at taking out Russian artillery, their drones are shorter range and are predominantly used to target Russian advances and not hunting 10-20 km behind their lines. They don't have huge stockpile of missiles to launch at artillery either.
>>64732354Do they not have factories churning these stuff out? Grim stuff. I hope they continue this war for another 30 years at least
>>64732354>record lowThey lost more than 500 tanks in 2021?
>>64732673If the Russians were fighting this war with only the vehicles they had actively produced since 2022 they wouldn't even be able to put together a full sized Brigade.
>>64732737This is bad. We need to supply the russians some materiel to keep this war going, not enough for them to win but not too little that they lose. Fuck we need more wars. When is China going to invade Taiwan...
>>64732721If by lost you mean misplaced, possibly... yes
>>64732455Radar-directed counter battery fire does not come with the benefit of a built-in killcam. You send shells at a ping on a map and then guess whether it stopped shooting because you killed it or because they scooted off and stopped shooting for a while.
>>64732426Any thoughts on speculation that Nork troops might play a role in a big offensive into Ukraine proper?
>>64735851I highly doubt it. Best Korea invaded Ukraine with Russia expecting to more or less waltz in and take over as Russia claimed was going to happen. Instead they got a spanking and yet another lesson in Russian lies. If Kim has any sense left he'll understand that Russia has little if anything to offer North Korea nor does it have enough military strength to threaten North Korea. Please God let Kim invade Russia instead in a land grab of their own. The Russian salt would never end.
>>64732354>0 vessels didn't they torpedo that sub while it was docked? Or was it just damaged
>>64732354>Vesels
