>EWAR will easily counter drones. It's only a problem for the unprepared and the poor. How to counter fiber optics?
>>64748125The ukies came up with razor wire that spun in place connected to a 9V battery and a simple brushless motor. The idea is that the razor wire would spin, wind up the fiber, and then cut it or crush it.
Fry them with microwaves.
>>64748125By bombing the launch base.
>>64748125Reaal question is how do you scrap all that? What's the per pound averages if you separate?
>>64748125Layered defense dipshit. You're not as smart as you think you are. Whatever electronic warfare doesn't take out gets taken out by kinetic means ala autocannon, machine gun, etc and non-kinetic means ala lasers. Shut the fuck up nigger.
not good I guess some wire carries a tiny chip every 7 meters lol?
No, I was wrong, ground silica is $30/ton. That's uh... better?
Can you weave that shit and bake it into a ceramic for plates? Trying to find the money idea here to be a fiber goblin. In the end, I jus luv me fibers.
>>64748155Reality: there will be enough hard kill counter measures only for 1% of troops.
>>64748125It's a self-correcting problem because over time the fiber lines from old drones build up into a net that new drones are unable to penetrate.
>>64748258>sends out drones carrying buckets of resin to encase you under a layer of fiber(optic)glasscheckmate
drones are the most overrated bullshit ever
>>64748258uh.......
>>64748125Shoot them down?
Lasers.
>>64748125Hard kill is the only long term solution, even RF drones will have optical lock at range capability with autonomous terminal guidance soon enough meaning they can lock from outside jammer range.The question becomes what is the best hard kill and we'll see a lot of different things enter service before we know the answer.Anti-drone drones will be decent for intercepting at range, AAA will be good for point defence, microwaves might get some love depending how much the cube squared law fucks them, lasers will be tried but I have doubts about their all weather capability.>>64748154It's glass so you might make $5 after picking up a couple of hundred km.>>64748246This, it'll be HMMWVs vs IEDs all over again until some serious cash is dropped to get nightly death counts off the news.>>64748565They are just a small cheap PGM and that is a pretty big deal, it's just retards keep acting like a quadcopter can do the same things as an F-35.
>>64748125reminder that droneniggers are sub-80 IQ retards and the ukraine war is the way it is because of a very precise combination of factors.
>>64748844So you can't forsee any use for sub-meter CEP PMGs with 20km range than can be carried by infantry outside of Ukraine?Even with an extremely liquid front drones are going to be the cheapest PGM by an order of magnitude so why not use them until hard counters are common?
