The premise is simple:Could the DPRK launch a offensive war with the goal of seizing Russia's Pacific holdings and win?
>>64751584No because that land belongs to China and they wouldn't let the norks have it.
It seems to be an important port city, but I don't think it has ever been useful other than receiving Lend-Lease supplies.
>>64751586Vladivostok is Korean land as is Manchuria. We are talking about recovering land from Russia not China, that will happen soon enough. The question of this thread is could Russia stop the DPRK from taking the Russian Pacific Coast in a situation of open warfare? Does Russia have the means to stop the DPRK in conventional combat?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUf3tqT4IDY&list=RDqUf3tqT4IDY&start_radio=1
>>64751586FPBP/thread
>>64751599Shut the fuck up retard
I just spent 2 hours ranting and raving at trolls just to see my efforts deleted along with them, i hope you guys appreciate how much time i spend defending you all.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gknEO820n00&list=RDV-4N0xBpU38&index=2
>>64751612No i will not.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUjqYfyvynQ&list=RDV-4N0xBpU38&index=3
>>64751613Nigger I took a 3 day ban because I posted about venezuala as the first reports came outNo one cares about your '""""sacrifice"""""
>>64751620Have you considered the possibility that i am right and you are wrong?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRlw-YOw2rw&list=RDV-4N0xBpU38&index=10
>>64751586Fuck is chinny gonna do?
Anime is brain rot
>>64751651No, because you're a faggot third world loving, self admitted shitposter Keel over already tripfag
>>64751584DPRK cant do shit to russia 1. They are allies2. Russia has 10,000 nuclear weapons
>>64751680A challenger appears
>>64751664They will do nothing, the Norks have enough atomic weapons that Beijing is a potential atomic wasteland.
>>64751687Yeah thats call suicide moron china can erase drpk off the map with nuke too.Literally noone is using nukes in east asia that will be ww3.
>>64751682>>64751680The DPRK has more military capability than Russia. Simple as facts.
>>64751710Russia have a autonuke feature if china invades their far east. Thats why chinks dont dare cross into their far east clay.
It's no accident that Norks are slang for tits.
>>64751715The DPRK has enough atomic weapons to obliterate Beijing or Moscow. Neither has the means to defeat the DPRK in a conventional conflict and the DPRK could smash Russia. It is my belief that with a decently planned attack the DPRK could take out the entire Russian Pacific fleet and within a month seize Vladivostok. Russia has no means available to defend against a DPRK onslaught in the Pacific.
>>64751710>DRPK gets nukedLmao>Simple as facts.You sound ESL
>>64751737>it is my belief>as a retarded nork shill>that norks could do whatever I think about in my wet dreamsNo one gives a fuck, tripfag.
>>64751679>third world You don't know what that means do you?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Aligned_Movement
>>64751764>talking about norks invading russia>talking about norks nuking ChinaWhat planet do you live on, stick in your lane senile fag
>>64751768>>64751764>>64751751>>64751749ITT: No one who went to High School when Ronald Reagan was alive and still President:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnox
>>64751584I'm surprised you don't have a version of this picture without lukashenko resolution.
>>64751599>The question of this thread is could Russia stop the DPRK from taking the Russian Pacific Coast in a situation of open warfare? Does Russia have the means to stop the DPRK in conventional combat?No.>>64751690POObear isn't going to want mutual destruction over Nork conquest of a Russian city. CHINNY might as well be nuking Alaska over the Iran revolution or Maduro getting nabbed.Fagass POObearFagass POOtinHeil Yo Jongdeez nuts
>>64751680>1. They are alliesDidn't stop Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
>>64751790He's poor and can't afford the storage or bandwidth, like a true nork.
>>64751814You are aware that is common knowledge that i am a reasonably financially endowed old guy who owns three houses right? I don't have 'fuck you' money but i do have 'grumpy weirdo with a RV' money.I'm not poor, if you count the bots and jeet spammers i'm more wealthy than 99.99% of the posters on this board.
>Can russia defeat the DPRK in a conventional war in the far EastNo.>elaborateObjective reality after is all the elaboration needed.>would russia nookNo. Moscow only cares about Moscow. Even pidorsburg would be an acceptable sacrifice as long as Moscow stands.>could China defeat the DPRK in a conventional warI believe they could. It would be expensive and bloody for them, but I believe they would be able to acheive air supremacy early on and the side with air supremacy wins the military aspect of any war.>would Kim nookProbably as soon as it became apparent the Chinese actually intended to invade.
>>64751947Best take so far, my only objections are:>I believe they could. It would be expensive and bloody for them, but I believe they would be able to acheive air supremacy early on and the side with air supremacy wins the military aspect of any war.1: If the DPRK was ready and dug in the PRC going across the Yalu would get slaughtered. The PRC could do it and get across, it would still be a bloodbath. Every inch of advance on DPRK soil would be a horror show.2: If they were losing the DPRK really would use tactical nukes while threatening escalation against population centers to get away with it.3: Pyongyang is effectively immune to assault/siege unless you really, really, really want to die.4:The Norks would hold out until they became the good guys5: The USA West would support them6:!!!?!??!?7: Victory!
Russia would draft around 300,000 males from those parts and it'd be over. 200,000 to hold the line until the others are trained in drone warfare, There's no way the Norks can do anything after that.Do the Norks even have anything like MANPADs and other semi-competent AA systems?
>>64751929>common knowledgeYou posting retarded shit doesn't make it true, retard
>>64752033>200,000 to hold the lineWhat are they holding the line with tho
>>64751584Brother, you’ve become too much like Boco. Granted you’re hyper-fixated on one niche but still. LIKE. BOCO. Scale it back it bit, you’re still not as bad as that worthless sack of shit.
>>64751613wot the feck is happening there?
>>64751584
