[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: m4 sheman.jpg (12 KB, 314x160)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
Why not mass produce again the m4 sherman, but a drone version of it.

Remove the old cannon, add the same auto cannon the apache has.
>>
Too based for this world. You would have to give it an automatic transmission and the ability to neutral steer though. The other problem is its size was intended for a crew, if it’s going to be unmanned then the size doesn’t need to be that large. The last is that all the tooling that was made to build them back in the day are all gone so it’s easier and cheaper to build a fresh design than to bring these back sadly
>>
>>64756511
Because the Sherman was cheap in WWII because it was optimized for the state of US WWII era industry and because if you’re making a drone tank, many of the design parameters of the Sherman make no sense. Reengineering the Sherman to function as a drone would be such a big change you might as well start from a clean sheet in order to better work with the realities of the modern manufacturing environment.
>>
>>64756511
Why would you make a drone sherman and not a custom drone tank that is designed to be uncrewed? You save on volume and can armor only key components, or nothing at all.
>>
>>64756626
>Why would you make a drone sherman
Sherman autism.
WW2 autism.
>>
>>64756626
You can make drones that are human controlled.

Get criminals that are on the death row. Put a collar bomb on them.
Make them drive the tank as requested, if they don't do as they are requested. the remote commander can push a button that sends a remote shock.

The turret and weapons is remote controlled by joystick by someone else.

Seems easy to be made right now.
>>
File: chain guns.jpg (412 KB, 2048x1536)
412 KB
412 KB JPG
>>64756511
Needs XM913 50mm chain gun instead of that little M230 of the Apache. Pic rel. M230 in the back, 50mm in front.
>>
>>64756511
a drone tommy cooker would be lethal to the electronics in actual battle - it's a no go
>>
It would cost tens of millions of dollars to make today
>>
>>64756511
Ripsaw M5?
>>
>>64756511
At this point the Bradley does everything the Sherman does and more.
>>
>>64756582
>The last is that all the tooling that was made to build them back in the day are all gone so it’s easier and cheaper to build a fresh design than to bring these back sadly
Actually we just gave it to Canada who still use it to make tractors.
>>
>>64757130
A myth as far as I can tell. Three Canadian companies made ag or forestry tractors based on the Sherman driveline and suspension, but they all appear to have used surplus parts instead of making new Sherman hulls.
>>
>>64756511
>we can have mini shermans that go 60+mph and are fully droned with AA guns or cannons, and can make them self-detonate if they run out of ammo or get close to the enemy



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.