>>64761470
it's worse than NASAMS

No. Though it's a bit cheaper.

64761491
>worse than NASAMS
tard detected

>>64761470
>looking at a single system within an iads

File: .jpg (1.2 MB, 1920x1080)

1.2 MB JPG

>>64761518

>>64761470
Aster-30 quite a bit bigger than PAC-3, having two stages is also kinematically better. Some of the advantages are offset by the large strakes though, though that is in itself mitigated by the lateral thrusters, used for smaller maneuvers. I think the yuro seeker is probably worse than PAC-3MSE, just based on diameter alone, but it's probably kinematically superior and the seeker is likely sufficient. That's solely looking at the missiles in isolation though, like >>64761518 says, looking at only one part of the IADS is naive.

>>64761470
If only we had a shooting war in Europe where he could prove his claims...

>>64761491
Nothing is worse than NASAMS, the whole concept of taking an A2A missile and turning it into a SAM is retarded.
>what if we launch it in the thickest air with no starting energy
SAMs need bigger boosters.