psa..... i kneelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3ULmhiW1WE
>all built around one MFC>actually there's two>and they're only for the pistolsThey should have figured out a way to make them all use the same parts.
>>64776363they do for rifles its called a "lower"
>No more X9FUCK
The problem with modular pistols is that nobody is constantly changing their pistol configuration. You generally find one setup for what you need (concealed carry, duty full-size, suppressed range toy, bedside gun, whatever) and keep it like that.Also, braced/stocked pistols are fucking retarded. Just like they were retarded when they were tried a hundred years ago.
>>64776363If you're going to go so far as make an MFC, why not make an 80% version. PSA's read and butter is helping people customize their firearms. Having an 80% MFC doesn't inhibit their ability to sell all the grip modules and accessories.
Wait so how many 4473s do I need to do? Did he ever mention that?
>>64776465this.I refuse to buy a pistol with backstraps you can swap tooit's fucking awful design
>SSGP riflestinky
>>64776276>PSA Crap mk 6 mod 27surely this time
>>64776465>nobody is constantly changing their pistol configthis is correct up until very recently.much like how at one point firearms were manually operated with bolts and levers and then suddenly werent
Wow more sweatshop slop. I'm sure it will be great just like everything else PSA makes.
>>64776276>X9 trashed for jackal clone #73837Fucking gay
>>64776276I don't get it. >>64776465this. i have one set up for my pistol and thats it. im going to build it and forget it. how can i insure that it's going to be accurate or work if im constantly rebuilding it or changing some feature.
Why does PSA want the market of other better made guns? Just make affordable options of things, make things inexpensive, provide well built Glock clones and parts, AR15 parts, etc, etc. just provide cheap slop like the manufacturer that you are and quit pretending people trust your quality.
>>64776642>provide well built Glock clones and parts, AR15 parts, etc, etc.>Well built You see that's where you're wrong
>>64776450>>64776625what are you black baboons talking about https://youtu.be/8Dk9P_tkIhM
>>64776436Which isn't compatible with the shotgun or the pistols.
>>64776513I believe it's one for the subcompact, one for the compact or full size, one for the rifle, and one for the shotgun. That makes four 4473s.
>>64776465I'm interested in a tiny braced pistol chassis but only to replace the .300 BLK AR I keep disassembled in a backpack. I like having something more than a handgun with me when I travel for work in certain areas. I stay in hotels about 50 days a year. Having to assemble an upper, lower, put a mag in, and rack a round into the chamber is kinda slow. Especially when deploying it from a bag.
>>64776465I can see an argument for going back and forth between regular handgun and pdw if you feel like larping at the range for a day. But yeah, I'd probably just end up buying two at that point if they're cheap enough.
>>64776465>have the exact same trigger pull on your EDC, pocket pistol, range toy, and OC innawoods gun>only need one 4473 for multiple gun configurations>don't have to worry about frame failure, it's a chunk of polymer without a serial>only the carrier is technically serialized, all the internals are ship to door partsYou people are so small minded. If they can use the same MFC for multiple calibers even better.>well I wouldn'tCool, I sure as hell would love to fill out one form and then ensure that any gun I took out of the house was setup exactly the same as any other gun because internally it is exactly the same. It's like arguing against buying one lower, putting good parts in it, and swapping uppers onto it.
