[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 69416_rd.jpg (191 KB, 1200x1200)
191 KB
191 KB JPG
Why do we still have hand thrown grenade when we have under barrel grenade launchers and this?
>>
>>64836899
Post skin color.
>>
>>64836899
How will you use grenades within the minimum arming distance?
>>
>>64836899
Faster, easier, simpler. Too much of a hassle too a 40mm through a door or window when you wanna blow up the room next door, or the trench a couple of meters away.
>>
>>64836899
Launcher weighs less. How are you so stupid you don't know that?
>>
>>64836899
You can't quickly toss a launched grenade around a corner or into a room without either running afoul of the minimum arming distance or nailing yourself with shrapnel. Go look at Ukrainian CQC footage - a lot of it consists of suppressing doorways and corners with rifle fire, and then tossing grenades in and continuing to suppress until those grenades go off. These sorts of tactics simply don't work with a grenade launcher.
>>
>>64836899
Because most humans come with at least one arm
>>
>>64836899
Do you carry a tripod in your pocket? How about sandbags? Shit is heavy. Trading rate of fire for mobility is useful.
>>
File: v16zz8aamz1c1.jpg (315 KB, 1800x2250)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
>>64836899
Weight, cost, availability, trajectory, and minimum arming distance. Take your pick.
>>
File: 1754787963167359.jpg (117 KB, 896x1156)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>64836954
>Go look at Ukrainian CQC footage
>>
>>64837013
The traditional hand grenade has inferior range, accuracy, AP, and blast radius to 40mm grenades regardless of if it's fired from a single shot underbarrel or a tripod mounted automatic. It's also never going out of style.
>>
>>64837032
Good thing it isn't an either/or choice
>>
>>64837013
fun fact about this picture, the grenade was a dud.
>>
>>64837018
>FYM mk. 1
>>
>>64837032
Defensive hand grenades (ie general purpose grenades) like M67's are more lethal in a confined space than a M433 HEDP or a plain 40mm HE, or the equivalent VOG-25.
Defensive grenades, by their very definition, are dangerous within the entirety of the average throwing distance. The M67 produces a fragmentation threat in open terrain up to 240 meters, 40mm HE up to 130 meters.
40mm is recognized as causing more casualties because it is commonly detonating above the ground - ie into the back wall of a room through a window, or into a tree in a forested environment sending secondary shrapnel everywhere, as opposed to a frag going off in the same environment on the ground, and the trees absorbing shrapnel and force.
There are also hand grenades that are designed to bounce and detonate in mid air like a bouncing betty as well as offensive impact detonation grenades - ie chuck it into a window it explodes against the back wall.
40mm also the effect of kicking up directional secondaries when it lands on open ground like rocks, this is not as pronounced with a hand grenade



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.