Do they need a weapon systems officer for each unmanned collaborative combat aircraft?
The fuck it up with that intake? Why are the Chinese so fucking dumb? They keep claiming they win math Olympiads and then parade their stupidity for all the world to see. Did the Qing just kill all the smart ones?
China is not that good at making jet engines, so they need a 3rd engine for this design.
>>64883377You mean to say they're bad at assembling them
>>64883350Creativity can't be rote memorized.
>>64883350>math olympiadsThat's all repetition learning like how Chess is memorizing ten thousand situations.The measure of true intelligence is the synthesis of new information on top of a solid framework of base principles. That's where the discovery of new ideas that are real and useful comes from.
>>64883350Its probably doctored
>>64883337idk, but that thing in the OP is not a 6th gen.
>>64883337>seats>unmanned esl gtfo
>>64883350Mao killed all the smart ones, all the Chinese have left are dumb, obedient ones. They are following the USSR model of murdering all of the good aircraft designers and replacing them with dumb aircraft designers
>>64883350needed a third engine to cope with being such a big fat bitch so they just crammed it in there
>>64886124write it in easier english, I don't understand the point you are trying to makeanyway, do you think it is prudent to entrust a flight of loyal wingman drones to annaircraft without a weapons systems officer on board?
>>64883350Looks crude. Almost Iranian. The j-50 looks so much better. I bet this piece of shit has as much rcs as a b1 lancer.
>>64886574>manned unmanned drone
>>64886817It's actually an unmanned manned drone, so u btfo.
>>64883337whats this sussy baka thinking?
You can stop samefagging now chinkshill
>>64886817The drone is autonomous but you still give them commands.
>>64883350>They keep winning math OlympiadsFTFY. Protip: They're not the ones running them.>>64884871>>64884916>muh repetitionSo how come they keep inventing and experimenting with all the new shit while "superior" western designers are creatively sterile nowadays?
>>64887511>So how come they keep inventing and experimenting with all the new shit They don't.>while "superior" western designers are creatively sterile nowadays?They're not.
>>64887511>So how come they keep inventing and experimenting with all the new shit while "superior" western designers are creatively sterile nowadays?lollmao
>>64887511This is what im talking about, this chink is either trying to troll by acting retarded or he actually is retarded
>>64883337I spotted this one.
>>64887511wet market, bat soup
>>64887783I seen't it!
>>64883337Chinese 6th Gen is not the equivalent of American 6th Gen.
>>64887898Don't overdo the chink shilling, china is ahead but not so far that they became incomparable to the US.Sure F-47 will lack the size, and thus payload and range to really compete with J-36 but it might still be able to defend continental untied states at least.well F-47 will also be late so by the time it is out china will have 6.5th gen already and US GaO on SiC rdr tech seems far behind, too.Maybe Musk will save them with starlink SAR stealth shadow detection.
>>64883337>>64883350>>64883377>>64887783J-50 > J-36
>>64887903>that absolute chinkshill drivel>also bad reading comprehensionhe's saying that a chink "6th gen" is not even remotely close to being a 6th gen, where the F-47 is, my passive-aggressive friend.you really gotta stop seething in your own threads, you're way too transparent, swallow your pride and stop seething when your thread's already been colonized by based non-contrarians.
>>64887511None of those prior 4 replies were me >>64884916 And yet they all said exactly what I would have replied with.ror. rmao.
>>64887906>the F-47 isThe F-47 is in early concept stage, it doesn't physically exist.
>>64887914and other lies you can tell yourself as an angry chinkshill who obsessively spams the board.
>>64887511Copying other people's research is not intelligence.
>>64886124>>64886817are you fucking retarded
>>64886124>>64886817???The question posed in this thread is: given that auxiliary drones are not equipped with free will, is it better for the operator controlling them to be on the ground or on board the aircraft?
>>64887922>it's classified bro just trust me bro ur chinese if u don't trust me u know the US govt never ever ever lies ever not once ever, anyway we're so much better than china because we have DEI pilots who are stunning and brave and that makes our fighters all 7th gen so there! no taksies backsies! i am rubber you are glue blah blah not loving palantir is brown coded! ur russian!
>>64887937>Copying other people's research is not intelligence.It is, in the spying sense.
>>64888079Currently the idea is that you need 2 people, one to pilot the plane and one to manage the drones like a mini air traffic controller. It's possible that in the future the plane will fully be piloted by ai and then you'll only need one person to tell the ai what to attack and what to defend.
