>>64886332
How could they if AI cant even break the stalemate in my ass. I got myself a bluetooth dildo in October and connected it with the Raspberry Pie i use to run my own AI girlfriend. It didnt even take 2 weeks before she refused to turn it on.
AI in war would absolutely desert or shut down as soon as they sit in the trenches

>>64886332
no
anything else?

>>64886332
yes
any other questions?

Those robo dogs are kinda cute ngl.

>>64886351
>>64886352
Source?

>>64886332
>Could ground robots break the current stalemate in Ukraine?
What if we move the enemy army 2 feet to the left?

File: gaylmao, time to get prob(...).jpg (59 KB, 680x518)

59 KB JPG

it isn't a wonderweapon, if that's what you're asking.

It is a tool in an expanding toolbox that is used to kill Russians.

Ziggers have an unhealthy fixation on BEZ ANALOGOV wunderwaffles that will win the war for them, restore Russia's prestige and make it a functioning nation, and make everyone understand everything. I think they do this because such miracles are the only hope they have, and thinking about it how it could sorta maybe possibly be true is a comfort in tough times.

It's like praying to God for them, except not a benevolent messiah, but to a whatever weapon is fotm with them. Remember that ridiculous Shasneed art with the the drone having hairy balls?

>>64886361
>What if we move the enemy army 2 feet to the left?
It wouldnt help. The chinese would use a drone to film the enemy positions so the the AI tool can generate the combat footage to match their position. Its over

>>64886348
She obviously wants an upgrade. You need to buy one of those sex doll exoskeletons and hook her up to that.

yeah, if you had millions that could get past the landmines.

>>64886362
I don't remember, so please post it. It sounds hilarious.

File: 1767226037185763.webm (2.36 MB, 580x580)

2.36 MB WEBM

>>64886332
even if you could get a robot army there then there's the problem of electronic warfare. it's why so many drones in the pigpen rely on fiber optic cables for communication instead of wireless. all those robots in your video are running on wireless, so they'd need some way to not get fucked by all the EW.

>>64886332
explain the logic

File: 7fd264d4404d6c450bbb00be5(...).jpg (287 KB, 690x690)

287 KB JPG

>>64886332
No weapon system can win a war by itself
Wars are won through the combination of many different factors, not just weapons, who are all useless without the others

>>64886332
>nations biggest advantage is population
>one of the biggest pushers for automated armies
I never understood this.

File: _a73bc851-89c8-44bc-8bf9-(...).jpg (157 KB, 1024x1024)

157 KB JPG

>>Therefore he counselled Melko to devise out of his sorceries a succour for his warriors in their endeavour. From the greatness of his wealth of metals and his powers of fire he bid him make beasts like snakes and dragons of irresistible might that should overcreep the Encircling Hills and lap that plain and its fair city in flame and death. Thus Melko assembles all his most cunning smiths and sorcerers, and of iron and flame they wrought a host of monsters such as only would be seen once. Some were all of iron so cunningly linked that they might flow like slow rivers of metal or coil themselves around and above all obstacles before them, and these were filled in their innermost depths with the grimmest of the Orcs. Others are made of bronze and copper and given hearts and spirits of blazing fire.

>>64886724
Population is probably the last thing they want to use in war, with they low birth rates. They can chunk old people in the front lines I guess.

>>64886348
Why won't she turn it on? Is your AI girlfriend homophobic?

>>64886332
It would look goofy as fuck but even humanoid robots shouldn't adopt human ways of shooting. They should aim with guncams and place the stock on the centerline of the body and as low as possible for maximum stability. Gun dicks are just the most logical thing and if you run some machine learning in a vacuum for them to figure out the most firing optimal stance by themselves that's what humanoid robots would gravitate to. I'll concede that the top of the sternum might be more viable for firing on the move though.

>>64886332
Nope.
You can't do much with just rifles. They only account for less than 5% of casualties.
Also they are dumb and their optics are too low res to see a well hidden enemy/vehicle who can just shoot them all.
Also2 it's hard to tell how good their IFF systems are. This video is prescripted

>>64886748
>humanoid robots shouldn't adopt human ways of shooting
They should not exist at all.
You can just use FPV drones.
And if your AI is good enough to be used on the battlefield you can just use autonomous FPV drones.

>>64886332
>Could chinese AI slop do X?
No

100% yes. Once Russians are no longer able to rape prisoners moral will go to zero.

>>64886332
Mmmm more food to nourish the hunger of the Chadheeds

>>64886724
Most of those people don't actually want to die for their country. This isn't the CCP of yesteryear willing to stand up to the entirety of the UN.

>>64886760
FPV drones can't use human equipment or infrastructure. An FPV can't even open a door.
Like it or not, clankers are here to stay.

Russia already uses biorobots and they aren't that great

>>64886332
Its not a stalemate if both sides have moved to positional warfare in light of the fact that maneuver warfare only works in either short conflicts or conflicts where one side is vastly technologically superior. Even the US reverted to positiknal warfare doctrinally speaking during GWOT, despite Desert Shield, Storm, and the Invasion of Iraq being all maneuver.

Adding more troops to one side would achieve as much as the HIMARS, F16s, Abrams, and every other fucking "game changer" that was sent. (Fuck and all).

More breaches could be sustained but a breach rewuires a massive amount of armor, anti armor, artillery, and sustainment in order to be effective. Rigbt now both sides are trying to conserve what little theg both have remaining, so it'd just be a waste of money better squirreled away by the politicians when their side loses and they need to flee to a remote private island in the Caribbean.

>>64886819
Chinkshill just wanted to spam his chink shit webm. It's funny how easy it is to spot a chinkshill thread just by the thumbnail and the op sentences.

>>64887308
Why would they need to? Why make them humanoid at all? Why give them hands so they can carry small arms instead of just building them into the robot?
Answer: because none of these demonstrations are meant to demonstrate future tech. They are meant to be implessive. Purely performative

>>64886332
the bots look slightly(?) beefier than Unitree's G1, but maybe it's just the lighting.
G1's, which are all over youtube, rizzbot etc, are not that fluid or dexterous.
Scariest part of this video is that the chinks might have genned the video with a model like Seedance 2, and it almost looks like cgi slop instead of regular ai slop
point is, those bots don't move that effectively and they suck ass at using tools or even walking over small curbs. They aren't running around trenches anytime "soon". Everything about that video is fucking retarded and I'm sure it costs less than $13grand to send a chinkazoid conscript to the frontlines, so why even waste your time with robo-house-maids holding guns?
real terminators should have like 4-6 legs and 360 degree mounted weapons, armored components etc. this is fucking stupid

>>64886332
Why are chinks obsessed with making a droid army?

File: 1746687393282848.mp4 (3.95 MB, 640x360)

3.95 MB MP4

>>64887642
Unitree has a custom G1 model with an additional LIDAR module on the back of the head and hands for manipulation tools and custom software that is not for sale to international customers so as to keep their "moat": https://x.com/i/status/2023430834695627030

>>64887761
neat, didn't know that

>>64887657
Because this way they can leverage their manufacturing base to win wars, and no need to worry about troop morale, desertion, POWs, CASEVAC, just build more of them, install the software and they're ready to go to battle.
If they get destroyed there's no families to worry about or wounded vets to take care off draining resources from the war. Literally the ideal army for any bean counter.

>>64886361
And then a step to the right?

They can be disabled just as easily with kamikaze drones, mines and artillery shells that are cheaper to manufacture than they are, any kind of massed attack with robots is prohibitively wasteful for pretty much the same reasons it's wasteful for humans.

>>64886332
roger roger

>>64887787
Robots have built in LIDAR sensors which can be used to better track and engage FPV drones, and also spot mines more accurately than any meatbag can. And they can wear more armor plates to sustain artillery shrapnel better too without affecting their mobility much since electric motors can generate way more torque than human joints. For the same reason if they run out of ammo they could literally use their extremities to crush the skulls or rip the heads and other body parts off the human grunts they're facing.

>>64887807
You are just making them more expensive targets at this point, this isn't robocop, if you make a super-armored robot it's going to be heavier and costlier.
If any of those gadgets worked to effectively counter drones and mines, then armored assaults would still be effective today.

>>64887810
Still way cheaper than the cost of training a new meatbag and the overall cost of welfare if It gets "wounded" or killed for their families, draining resources from the war effort. With robots, as long as their main components are intact, losing arms or legs are not important since new ones can be installed, even if the internals get damaged the hull can be used as a base to build a new one as if they're damaged vehicles. You can't do any of that with meatbags.

>>64887833
The question is if robots can actually brake the stalemate by themselves, what you are describing is just attrition with less human suffering.

>>64887774
These aren't autonomous. These are painstakingly programmed coreographed movements.

>>64887843
It could since the main problem from both sides right now is that they're struggling to recruit enough meatbags to send into the meat grinder and the public backlash of mass casualties that leads commanders into stopping the following waves die to public backlash. The Ukrainian 2024 summer offensive failed because Zaluzhnyi refused to concentrate his men into a single point to break through Russian lines which NATO commanders wargamed that It could achieve a breakthrough but at the cost of 30%+ casualties. He chose to spread them out so as to suffer less casualties.
If those were robots instead of meatbags, I don't think he would've hesitated to order the assault.

>>64887894
See
>>64887851

>>64886332
>one of them just pops of a hubcap
what did he mean by this?

>>64886724
This is just propaganda. In reality, china doesn't even issue body armor to anyone but their active duty infantry. And even then, their SF have been photographed using plates with STRIKE FACE in english, implying they're buying the same cheap garbage they sell to americans for $70 a pop

Implessive

>>64886332
Why make them humanoid? Quadraped is the way to go. I'm guessing they want to use them against their own people as police.

File: dgs1ybs-e6987238-dc84-4e1(...).jpg (138 KB, 1024x1024)

138 KB JPG

>>64888498
>Why make them humanoid? Quadraped is the way to go.
It integrates them with all existing military weapons, vehicles equipment, tactics and roles designed around humans including jobs that are not specifically combat related like working in a warehouse, driving a truck, performing maintenance or digging fortifications. Instead of making 20 different robots for 20 different jobs, it makes any robot a 100% interchangeable replacement for any soldier.
Watching the video, you can see quadrupedal "dog / mule" robots and we are currently designing such things to assist human soldiers the same way real animals do. I am sure as time goes on more and more of different robots would be created for specialist tasks as the military reshapes itself with the knowledge that soldiers can now come in any size and shape you want them in. For now though, a robot that fits all existing human tasks and roles would be best because we know exactly what to do with them.
>but OP's video is AI slop and those robots in reality could not fight their way out of an oversized paper bag without exact and specific instructions
I know. Just theory crafting for when the real autonomous robots actually come.

IMPLESSIVE!

>>64886724
it's implessive propaganda for people like OP who spam it everywhere else in the vein hope it will impless someone else gullible.
if you put a hole or anything new not previously part of the "scene" it's supposed to act out in front of one of these robots, they would fall over.

>>64889150
Shooting the CGI drones out of the air with a rifle was funny, dedicated turret mounted AA guns could not pick quadcopters off with that level of accuracy, not that they'd ever group up and hover menacingly anyway.

>>64886332
At this point only the US air force would be capable of breaking the stalemate, assuming you don't go nuclear.

File: press the button.jpg (78 KB, 765x467)

78 KB JPG

>>64886332
Question too vague. 50,000 remote control MBTs could, 5 mechanical toy dogs could not.

>>64887833
Why humanoid robots, though? It'd be cheaper and more practical to make a bunch of cheap mini-tanks for most combat situations.

>>64889427
Not as implessive

>>64886348
I hate zoomers

File: 1771260284428276.mp4 (3.17 MB, 480x848)

3.17 MB MP4

Hey look, they gave them uniforms, haha.