>it took the CIA 3 (three) years to send some unmarked 11.5" Geisseles to 2 (two) AFU structures (SBU & Kraken)I don't want to hear the "muh glowies" turdie screeching ever again.
They simply didn't need to, half the western world was sending containers full of old service rifles for years. At this point a lot of those (already worn out in many cases) rifles have run out or been bricked by lack of spare parts, so the need for complete new rifles is actually higher now.
>>64886746buy an ad
>>64886858Ur mum should buy an ad.
>>64886862she doesn't need to
>>64886868>girl so fat she is her own billboardPretty impressive desu
>>64886746At this point what is a glownig 11.5" AR going to do against a war thats mostly drones, artillery, and missiles?
>>64886980
>>64886980Not much, but the SBU are feds, so the CIA have a sorta professional curtesy to ensure they have decent gear. Much in the same way that they bought uniforms and gear for the Afghan NDS and bankrolled the Iraqi gold division.
>>64886746Are these parts manufactured unmarked or did they get sanded off/anonymized?
>>64886746>it took the CIA 3 (three) yearKILL YOURSELFhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timber_SycamoreKill yourself again.Timber Sycamore is the perfect example of just how fast and effectively the CIA will covertly arm third worlders if the US actually cares about arming them.It's especially funny, since the program to arm Syrian islamists directly purchased arms from Ukraine.
>>64887014>the program to arm Syrian islamists directly purchased arms from Ukrainewhere did you hear that?because google says:Based on available reports, there is no direct evidence that the CIA purchased weapons from Ukraine to supply Syrian rebels. The CIA-led program (Timber Sycamore) focused on purchasing weapons from regional partners, such as Croatia and other Eastern European nations, which were then shipped to rebels through Turkey and Jordan
>>64887014Yeah that guy is dumb. Trump bragged about delivering javelins to Ukraine, something Obama refused to do.If anything Trump has exaggerated the amount of gear sent not the other way around.
>>64886746I think having "unmarked" Geisseles is fucking hilarious, like nobody on Earth could figure out where they're fromIt would be more intelligent to just send marked Geisseles with sanded off serials, at least then it's not "obvious glownigger contract rifle"
>>64887027>where did you hear that?Articles and relevant sources reporting on the US purchasing Ukrainian arms. There was no obvious source for what purpose they were being purchased for, but the obvious conclusion anyone can recognize is that Timber Sycamore and even the Pentagon program took a good chunk of them, since it's not like US troops are using Ukrainian produced arms in the amount those purchases referred to. There's no need for that many arms in OPFOR exercises. (Do OPFOR even use Russian arms to begin with? I can't remember any exercise where that was truly the case, except for Russian Sukhois.)I was actively following the Syrian conflict, and a significant factor there was that the US was purchasing Ukrainian small arms. Of course, you can't find that on modern search engines, since they either delete old information of remove anything in favor of governments in charge.I genuinely feel disconcerted now that I'm seriously trying to find the sources for these purchases and am finding absolutely none. All of them have been removed and deleted.So, I'll openly admit I have no proof.The proof has been deleted, so I can't argue against you or your point of view. This sucks.>because google says:Google does not say any of that.You are reading the drivel and vomit of an LLM that has no ability to question what it is regurgitating.Regardless, Google is an entirely controlled source of sources, which will not provide you with the information you seek if it goes against the narrative any significant power is trying to push forth.
>>64887054>where did you hear?>somewhere, trust me. no source but here's wall of cope text ok, checks out
>>64887067Yes. I admit it completely.I can't provide you with a source, so I can't argue against you.I'm not trying to push an agenda, I'm just reiterating my own experiences and knowledge. I fully recognize and understand that since I can't give you a source, I have no ground to stand on.All I can tell you is that a decade back, these purchases were published and freely available just by Googling them.The US bought tens of thousands, probably hundreds of thousands in total, of small arms from Ukraine. Rifles, machine guns, simple small arms like that.These purchases were perfectly focused for supplying the Syrian rebels, which Timber Sycamore and the Pentagon program did to a grand extent.But, again, since I can't provide you with a source, you can freely ignore my statements.
>>64887054many such cases. I remember when Benghazi happened it was a widely discussed open secret that the diplomatic mission in Libya was a front for trafficking arms in the region, and Hillary was closely tied up in it. tried looking it up recently and all those sources are sanitized or outright gone. Information and narrative control is more insidious than ever.
