[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: AGM-179_JAGM.png (541 KB, 1401x698)
541 KB
541 KB PNG
why is the UK already replacing their Brimstones with the JAGM?
>>
Are they.
>>
They're not
JAGM is only being bought for AH-64E because Boeing was pressured to block Brimstone integration on Apache because it will harm JAGM exports

JAGM isn't going to be used by the UK on any fixed-wing or ground-based platform. Only Apache, which will probably be retired early and replaced by drones anyway, because attack helicopters are a dead-end capability
>>
>>64888334
Damn, so Brimstone is now confirmed to be so good that it made Boeing freak out and get pissy.
>>
Trump made them do it
>>
>>64888334
and tanks are dead end
and carriers are dead end
and APCs are dead end
and guns are dead end...
>>
>>64888334
UK is buying 3000 JAGMs...
>>
>>64888334
UK Apaches have been using Brimstone since 2015.
>>
>>64888712
The UK also bought a bunch of new AH-64Es which are set up stock to use the JAGM while Brimstone would require integration, so it is the cheaper option. They may yet get it in future but for now that's what they have.
>>
Brimstone seems really cool with the autonomous target selection stuff, have Ukraine got much out of it with their land-based version? I wonder if both sides using similar gear and turtle-tank silhouette has limited the impact.
>>
>>64888730
>have Ukraine got much out of it with their land-based version?
They keep getting sent more of them so it can be assumed they are firing them at something and so need replacing and that they are effective enough at it for them to keep wanting more over other systems.
>>
>>64888712
The UK has approval for 3000 through the service life of the AH-64E via FMS. So far they have only bought 160.

>>64888718
No they haven't
MBDA did Brimstone firing trials on a Boeing-operated AH-64E in 2015, but the missile wasn't fully integrated with the aircraft's systems - For example the aircrew had no ability to select the missile's flight profile or seeker and fuse mode in flight.
No Brimstones were ever fired from a WAH-64D Apache Mk.1, which is what Britain operated from 2000 to 2020
During procurement of the AH-64E, Britain wanted to integrate Brimstone on their AH-64Es, but it was too expensive - Boeing quoted an integration cost that was £120 million more than the combined budget for buying JAGM, Hydra/APKWS and future purchases of Hellfire and 30mm ammunition through FMS.
As such, the UK isn't going to use Brimstone on AH-64E either



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.