How does chamber size affect patterning and accuracy? Like I heard .224 wylde chambers are less accurate than dedicated .223 varmint gun chambers.Does this apply to other guns? Like will a shotgun pattern worse if you shoot 2 3/4ths shells out of a 3 inch or 3.5 inch chambers? If not, why don't all shotguns have 3.5 inch chambers?Do you get reduced accuracy if you use .38 in a .357, .22 short in a .22lr or .44 special in a .44 mag?
not politics
>>64888511what?
>>64888521Stop making these shitty bait threads to distract people from Trumpedo and the files, MIGAtard
>>64888524we're on /k/, not /pol/, you gay retard
If anything, it would be the opposite..223 Remington has a narrow throat, but it’s short5.56 has a wider throat, but it’s longer than .223 Remington .224 Wylde has the narrow throat length of the .223 Rem, but the length of the 5.56. You want early engagement on the rifling and less freebore. Of those three, Wylde gives you the most engagement.
>>64888534why are varmint guns .223 only? I thought they were supposed to be more accurate
Your understanding is wrong.
>>64888546Because a .223 Remington chamber shoots .223 Remington ammo more accurately than a Wylde or 5.56 NATO chamber does. And not even good .223 Remington chambers can shoot 5.56 NATO ammo accurately enough for varmits, because 5.56 NATO isn't made for accuracy but for punching tiny holes in mild steel helmets at 600m, and the typical varmint doesn't run around wearing 1950's era steel helmets, mild or otherwise.
