why is that?
>>64930769Don't wanna look like a little bitch when there's sexos like this watching. You'd better win if you wanna smash that.
[citation needed]
>>64930775these babes are built for big ethiopian cocks
>>64930775FactWorld War 2 is proof of that.Hans returns to base in his shot up Bf 109, no victories, doesn't care it's all bros there who won't judge him.Nigel returns to base in his shot up Spitfire, no victories, he gotta walk past all the Stacies judging his manhood now. So next time he's gonna make sure to come back with some kills.This is how the Battle of Britain was won.
>>64930775makes perfect sense evolutionarily. women instinctually get mad when they see a man relaxing or slacking off. it could also be that men are biologically programmed to 'take it east' when theyre in a male only environment
>>64930769>>64930775>>64930790In a male only environment all the men are too busy riding each other[See: the russian army]
>>64930769Only western armies use women in war. Western armies are better at war than thirdies.It's that simple
>>64930769because you can tap into a wide base of personnel for manning logistics and desk jobs, which as boring and menial as they are, still perform critical functions to maintain a fighting force.
>>64930775This. Iirc they did a study and NBA players scored more baskets when they had hit celebrity females sitting in the front row. It’s kind of the whole point of cheerleaders.
>>64930769Any disadvantages they have in comparison to men (which yes they obviously have) probably aren't really enough to actually significantly impact a militaries overall performance in a negative way, especially if they're given specific supporting roles.Also, even beyond that, the specific physical and mental abilities of any particular soldier/demographic group of soldiers matters infinitesimally less than the strategic, logistical and tactical capabilities of the power that they fight for and are thus equipped and supported by. Which isn't to say there shouldn't be physical requirements for soldiers, just that it's one relatively small part of one gigantic many parted machine.Also on a different but similar note, I don't see why the topic of "they'll get raped" comes up on this discussion so much, as I am absolutely 100% convinced that men get raped some ridiculous number like 20x more than women in modern wars, if any footage from a modern conflict has taught me. (E.G. Ukraine/Russia war)One has to wonder if it's always been this way and they just didn't write about it in the history books out of shame.
>>64930769prostitutes make good stress relief post battles, that is essential to the mental health of the soldiers.
>>64930848rape was a big part of classical conquests in the classical age, a theoretically discouraged thing in the middle ages, and an 'unfortunate reality of men with their blood up' in times after that. it just isn't pleasant or glorious to write about usually.
>>64930848>it's one relatively small part of one gigantic many parted machineYeah I think it's better to think of military systems as a system, or as you put it, a machine. I'm mainly sick to death of the whole argument as my eyes glaze over, and at this point I'm like yeah sure men are superior to women in the infantry and women should stay out, but you're also probably going to get droned by a girl with pink dreadlocks and a Waffen SS tattoo, welcome to the 21st century.https://youtu.be/5NdCJHPHL-8
>>64930860>rape was a big part of classical conquests in the classical ageWell yeah, rape of women in conquered territory has been written and talked about extensively, but I don't remember any well known writings about rape of men in those same context, and more specifically, rape of enemy combatant men.Well actually I take that back, I think that actually does happen in the bible, but I can't recall anything else.
>>64930827This. I fucking hate 90% of the posters on this site.
Armies, and societies at large, only employ women when they're already so successful that effectiveness isn't really the prime concern anymore, when they can "afford" it. How is this not the first reply?
>>64930899I'm not a sage when it comes to ancient civilizations, but I think you stood a good chance of getting executed while captured by ancient Roman and Greek armies and sold into slavery if you were a kid which you can extrapolate considering how male-boy, uh, relations often worked back then. It's an extreme sci-fi example but it'd be like dealing with the Harkonnens in terms of world outlook and values compared to the later Christians (seems more evident why that developed among the slaves and lower classes of that society as the complete inversion of the dominant morality):https://youtu.be/Lh-vXwkaCnc
>>64930769because they're big enough to waste money on woman soldiers
This correlation can probably be explained by the fact that modern nations are more likely to have women in the military for social reasons and modern nations are obviously more capable militarily than backwards shit holes. So the women are a symptom and not a cause.
>>64930928>good chance of getting executed while captured by ancient Roman and Greek armiesThat's be a waste. They only did mass executions if you really pissed them off and they needed to make an example like with Spartacus' rebels. Usually your fate would be to be sold into slavery and you'd die a very painful death working in a mine or quarry.
>>64930848What the fuck is wrong with you?
>>64930827>>64930907Is this why the Viets won in the end?
>>64930769imagine the sweat and musk of the left one
>>64930779yuro timeyuro post>>64930789the bongs were losing world war 2 and getting rapes and gaped until we single handedly bailed them out
>>64930796gay sex is a Yuropean army tradition. see all the bong naval officers who were caught fucking boys
>>64930839it's literally not even that. they are doing like the US or the jews vs towel heads and then saying the jews beat the towel heads because they have more women
>>64930827this, OP is a 80 IQ retard
>>64930962/thread>>64930970But while we're still here:>1,4,3,2
>>64931085No vlad, you are just a bunch of gays and also not european.
>>64931246I'm American, you tranny. every "male", for lack of a better word, from Reykjavik to Vladivostok is a huge fucking faggot who cant stop sucking dick and swallowing semen
>>64931238They are rook same to me
>>64930769armies with women in them are more likely to be armies of developed countriesdeveloped countries are more likely to win a war than developing countries because they have more money and can therefore throw more funding at their military if required
>>64930970I wish slopes didn't have those jungle-ass smurf house mushroom noses.
>>64930769What the hell are those kneepads on the left? There's no way those are real. They look permanently bent.
>>64930970USA won.
>>64931078>>64931085>>64931266Silence, golem.
>>64931494Now you're just making shit up.
>>64933004you literally worship a jewish dictator, thirdie golem
>>64932918If you look real closely you can see a hinge and line where the top kneepad part will overlap the lower part and slide over the bottom... It's really faint in that picture though...
>>64930769Freer countries are generally richer countries, allowing women to work increases economic output and leads to better funded militaries.
>>64930769A culture that is better able to take advantage of a full half of its population in every field is inevitably that much stronger.
>>64930769in some societies it is indicative of the ability to mobilize broadlyin the US idk what it indicates just egalitarianism of GI bill maybe but with a little bit girl bossing (warring)
>>64933299I'm not a burgermutt tho
>>64930769>these knee guardsAstra Militarum vibes
>>64931078Unequivocally correct. Hilarious that 7th fleet took a direct nut shot at Pearl then immediately laid belt to ass across the pacific with whatever random shit they had laying around unexploded. Meanwhile the UK was losing Singapore to dudes on bicycles and having their entire far east squadron dabbed upon by one jap bomber on a side quest. Truly some of the most laughably bad combatants in history
>>64930769Wealthy countries are more likely to have adopted the luxury of allowing women to serve, due to their more socially progressive policies. Wealthier countries tend to win more regardless.
>>64930848Yeah it would really be a shame to be raped by two soldierettes like in OP, haha... Just imagine them riding your face with their sweaty bottoms, ew, hehe....
>>64930827and as we all know, correlation = causation
>>64930769You need to be far better than the rest if you want to hve a functioning military and thots in uniform.Its just a higher skill floor for the rest of the military.
>>64930769Stretches manpower and puts less emphasis on muscle power. You don't need John Musclearms sorting reports and counting ammo crates but you need reports sorted and ammo counted just so you don't end up attacking the wrong place with no ammo. Jane Goodenough is perfectly fine for desk jobs and garrison duty. Likewise, if you don't need heavy lifting it's because you've got more machinery to do the heavy lifting for you. Trucks and forklifts don't need to sleep so the army that has more logistics tech is at an advantage.
>>64934516[spoiler]Tactical Strap-ons[/spoiler]
>>64934497>entire far east squadron dabbed upon by one jap bomber on a side questNo way that is true.
>>64930789The Germans had judgemental Stacie’s too, your argument is invalid
I was about to say something along the lines of>Correlation doesn't equal causation>Western armies have more women in the army AND western armies are typically better due to....But now that I think about it, The Kurds are famous for having women fighters and those aren't western, rich, hi-tech or anything.And still they punch above their weight class, at least that's the impression I get.
>>64938270>Kurds punch above their weight classTheir motivation is ideological, racial, and religious. And their survival is more or less at stake too.They care a lot more about winning than the enemy cares about losing.Also, many are refugees in the west so western education and influence is reasonably common too.
>>64938270those are some surprisingly hot women for an inbred middle eastern nation
>>64930769I would post the webm of the IDF slampigs the Hamas gooners rounded up in a barracks and are appraising them for their breedability on the big surprise attack a few years back but 4chan instabans you for it(as does reddit, I discovered)
>>64940497Nah because it doesn't exist.>nearly 15:00 estMutt's law
>>64930769Statistically, players who no longer use the meta builds and decide to fuck around a little are more likely to win. Why is that?
>>64940497>4chan instabans you for itDid you try posting in /gif/ or /k/?
>>64938133Those aren't Stacies, they are loving mommies who tell you they're proud of your ceaseless struggle to protect the Vaterland und Volk.
>>64930769>Greater numbers overall by recruiting men and women, not just men.>Militaries that habitually accept women need to have women's bathrooms, supplies, medical aid and bunks, atop all that for men, meaning they're probably better at logistics and supply work.>Entirely adequate for roles not requiring physical performance. You don't need to be a decathlon athlete to drive a truck, be a quartermaster or work in intel.>Having a camp whore or an established body of camp whores always improves morale.>Greater number of perspectives during briefings, plannings and operations.>Also greater range of perspectives as you're drawing from a pool of the population you'd otherwise exclude.The last one is a big one imho, and it's the first thing every turd world military gets wrong. Most famous of them all, Russia.By making an army of only men that pass the manly man vibe check, your command staff is full of a handful of people who, if they don't all think the same way, will only offer the same ideas and suggestions so as to not appear to be a pussy, even when they can think of better ones that just don't sound brave/bold/manly/daring/aggressive enough.Meanwhile the gay homo western army with fags and furries and rainbows and... women... will have an order of magnitude more people in the war room, who come from all walks of life, all have different skills and perspectives, and are devoting 100% of themselves to their work, instead of 50% to the work, and 50% to fitting in.
>>64934480>They've run into Ciaphas Cain while on perimeter patrol.
>>64930848>>64930888I think people forget just how much of a western-style military is jobs other than being the guy wearing a plate carrier and running towards dudes that want him dead.Even if you do just blanket say women can't take direct contact infantry roles, there's a billion other jobs they can be doing which to deny them is to just needlessly reduce the depth of your talent pool.Just make sure you don't do something monumentally retarded like having a whole base full of young women with no combat training, no firearms, a vanishingly small garrison protecting them, put them right next to where you suspect an attack might come from, then ignore them when they do their job in telling you they think an attack is coming.Good thing nobody's that retarded, what a silly hypothetical.>>64945629When you select for guys that look tough in recruitment ads and put up with the ass rape, you end up with an army built to look cool in recruitment ads and put up with ass rape.
>>64930769Because the ones that do also have satellites.
>>64940735do they? pull out the sauce.
>>64930769Armies with a lot of money are more likely to win a war, and training women is a massive waste of money, so armies that don't have a lot of money can't afford to do it.
>>64945824>>64945949None of those applied to ww2 soviet union.
>>64945988That had more to do with the fact that America was handling all of their logistics for them.
>>64932925>USA won.Ok, where's the Republic of Vietnam Government then?
>>64931078>>64934497As of December 1941 (right before US entry) it was impossible for Germany to win the war, especially with the same leadership that had led them to that point in place. They had lost any chance of defeating either the UK or USSR by then.I grant you that in this scenario with zero US involvement at all, bongs would have lost Malaya, Singapore, and Burma. I highly doubt Japs could ever take India however. And the war against Germany will drag on into at least 1946, possibly later. But the end result of a very costly and bloody Allied victory would remain.Oh, and we may well in this scenario end up with a fully communist Germany and Austria, leading to a very different Cold War. That's the other downside. I think bongs would be able to secure Italy and France in time especially since both places would prefer that to being a USSR satellite state.
>>64930769If you Can afford to integrate women in your armed forces, you usually already are in a good enough situation that whatever drawbacks there might be at having women in the ranks.
>>64946057You watch, anything even remotely anti-IDF gets mass reported and janny removes. I fully expect the same here. This is more moderated than Twitter now, which really makes you think.
>>64930970>That one Vietcong woman who was so brutal she had to be taken out by m2 Browning 700 meters awayMy kind of woman
>>64946057influencer propaganda is for the israeli tho, it was never meant to be used as recruitment tool for american servicemen.
>>64945949the countries flaunting about their rambo-esque macho men armies are usually turd world paper tigers who waste a lot of money trying to look more intimidating to foreigners. only that unlike western countries, instead of achieving more advanced technologies and the knowledge on how to use them, they instead earn at the best of times a non-insignificant dose of temporary soft power to use in their foreign politics exchanges.
>>64946238i don't see much of a cost in hiring women. for a different set of lockers and paid maternity you have effectively doubled the manpower, in a job which is nowadays 90% desk jockeying anyway.
>>64930769Statistically the number of wars after WW2 cover a diminutive fraction of human history, and can not be considered representative sample.Statistically if I employ an office full of foids deciding which brand of Grape Drank private Tyrone gets for his gender-reveal party, my army now has more women working for it, while I bomb and drone desert niggers in mudhuts.Statistcially OP is a faggot.The depressing amount of pro-bullshit posts in this thread reveals that basically every second guy here is some corpo/government shill, that never actually did anything besides leech off of taxplayer money, because an actual business can not and should not waste money on massive and costly virtue-signalling gestures.
>>64930827This.Right-wing machismo is a simplistic, emotion-based concept. The further you go to the right, the more you see a rejection of the complexities of science in favor of simple heuristics. A right-wing ape is emotionally driven to fight against reality to impose the social delusion he prefers. War is where the rubber hits the road. A 155mm artillery shell doesn't care about your feelings. A society that is rational enough to put its ego aside and see women as useful is going to be able to process other things by their utility as well. Simply believing that your hate makes you invincible and charging at the "other" with a rock in your fist just doesn't work when the "other" has an M-16 and had the brains to keep it maintained. Enlightened liberal democracy beats ignorant tribalism.
>>64946445Observing the psychological and physical differences between men and women is not an emotional difference, its a scientific one. Also, no one has actually used women in war yet. In the West this trend, which is purely ideological, started as GWOT was ending. While Israel keeps women far away from combat.
>>64946496those differences exist outside the military too, yet women are part of the workforce and contribute to it. i honestly haven't seen a drop in performance since the introduction of women, did you?
>>64945830You can sauce my cock you fucking nerd.
>>64946533>yet women are part of the workforce and contribute to it.Yes, because working an office job is exactly the same as humping 6 miles with 40 pounds of kit and then assaulting a fortified position. >i honestly haven't seen a drop in performance since the introduction of women, did you?Marines studied it, >All-male squads performed better in 69% of the evaluated tasks>Faster at movement and obstacle courses>More accurate with weapons>Faster at casualty evacuation>More effective under heavy loads>Less prone to injuries>Female Marines in the experiment had significantly higher injury rates than men during training tasks.See: 2014–2015 U.S. Marine Corps Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force (GCEITF) study
>>64946335That's the thing though, paying a group of otherwise unemployable men to take their shirts off and do thousands of push ups doesn't really cost anything. That's why they do it.
>>64930769Because primitive "statistics" is being misapplied. Many such cases.
>>64946550>All-male squads performed better in 69% of the evaluated tasksnice
>>64930769its extremely simple actually from an evolutionary biology. foids and moids evolved to live together in a camp\cave\whatever over the past 100k years thats what shaped the human psyche. foids have instinctual behaviors that keep moids in check and moids have instinctual behaviors that keep foids in check. any group of isolated foids or isolated moids (im talking for periods of weeks/months) go crazy and give subpar performance in whatever theyre doing.
>>64930769show me those stats
>>64946496There being differences does not equate to, "Women belong in kitchen. Rock in Grug hand say so!"
>>64930769Because those 'armies' (there's only one) are so large, powerful and effective that they can afford to add women to a conflict without worrying about losing it.
>>64946738Okay so why does every competitive sport have separate categories for men and women, and why do even the most hardcore feminists admit that trannies have an unfair advantage when they're allowed to compete in the women's category?
>>64946550>>64946618>copy paste from fithttps://cmrlink.org/data/sites/85/CMRDocuments/288862790-Ground-Combat-Experimental-Integrated-Task-Force-Report%20(1).pdfThe 978 page report is just page after page of all male squads outperforming mixed-gender squad. This does not mean however that women cant serve in support roles. It just means they are not a good choice for frontline roles.
>>64946813https://wiisglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Research-Summary-Final_9Sept15.pdf
>>64930827This. US wins DESPITE having women in the military, not because of it.
>>64946533>i honestly haven't seen a drop in performance since the introduction of womenWell have mixed gender squads been deployed into combat yet? Studies have been done and they clearly underperform vs all male squads. See>>64946813 >>64946825
>>64930962Not to mention the fact western armies are so overwhelmingly powerful that they can afford to handicap their capabilities by 10-15% and not be worried about compromising their national security. Also women in the military tend to vote for more military spending and to pressure their sons to join, so it has a third order of effect that is beneficial.
>>64946970>Also women in the military tend to vote for more military spending and to pressure their sons to join, so it has a third order of effect that is beneficial.There's probably other social benefits that apply too. Some sort of perk of civilisation that means your military more accurately reflects your society, being better at handling female civilians in the theatre, that's outside of any stereotyped "emotional intelligence" or anything, I mean more measurable stuff.An obvious benefit is:The US military doesn't have a maximum quota for recruits, so a woman in the military isn't replacing a man in the military, it's adding an extra body. That's going to be better even if the benefit of that individual isn't scaled 1:1.Women in the military (especially infantry) are invariably women who really want to be there, there's some benefit to that too. They're going to be more motivated than the men ON AVERAGE because it's not a default choice for them to be there, they're just following their girlfriends and not (usually) falling for vidya/movie propaganda.At the officer level, it probably doesn't matter at all except that again, they're probably a little more motivated than men on average.
Funny how the moment Iran, a country ruled by a fundamentalist islamic theocracy, got assraped by america, suddenly this board saw an unusual influx of women hate threads.
>>64930769Because you're comparing countries that can afford to have women in cushy non combat jobs to countries that cant
>>64947752>suddenly this board saw an unusual influx of women hate threadsThey were always kind of here because it's yet another part of the culture war and Russia has been pushing that forever.
>>64930848I could not agree more with your post on all levels.
>>64946046>This vietcope again
>>64947808The war was literally to get France and the US to leave. So yes Literally definitionally, by ever metric that matters the USA lost in Vietnam.
>>64947841But they didn't "get" the US to leave like the Vietcopers pretend. The US chose to leave because the it's own populace was disgusted by how badly we were assraping the North. So no, by definition, the US did not lose. Charitably you could call it a draw (because the winning team chose to end the game)
>>64947779There's also the aspect that "cushy non-combat jobs" enable capabilities that win modern wars. Thirdies don't have those capabilities so they don't have any cushy non-combat jobs so they can't use women even if they want to.
>>64930769Because they are all progressive Western nations with enough force, logistics and trained men to overcome the sandbagging women and still dominate untrained underequipped thirdies.
>>64945823>Just make sure you don't do something monumentally retarded like having a whole base full of young women with no combat training, no firearms, a vanishingly small garrison protecting them, put them right next to where you suspect an attack might come from, then ignore them when they do their job in telling you they think an attack is coming. >Good thing nobody's that retarded, what a silly hypothetical. Is this your sexual fantasy? Keep it to yourself.
There is literally no significant difference between men and women, same way there's no notable difference between the various human races. Anyone who disagrees need to go back to the fuckin 1800s
>>64948090>There is literally no significant difference between men and womenThat is objectively incorrect and you're a stupid faggot.>same way there's no notable difference between the various human races.Also incorrect, dipshit.
>>64947634>Women in the military (especially infantry) are invariably women who really want to be thereWrong, and if you had served you'd know that they're the most useless, work-avoidant fucks you will ever have the misfortune of coming across. They were only motivated to "prove everyone wrong" and get hired to do the job, not to actually do the job. Oh wow, they let you through the intake process with a much lower standard, even going so far as to falsify your results to make sure you passed, such infantry, wow much soldier. Now let's see you dig a trench. Oh wait, all the dudes dug your trench. Ok, do your job as loader and haul your battle buddy's spare ammo. Oh wait, it's too heavy for you, so he's carrying ALL of it, oh and someone else is also carrying your ruck for you because you got too tired. Now that's soldiering!Fucking cunts, and fucking faggot liberals that make life harder for the men who actually do something for society because they're soooooo fucking inclusive.
>>64947752>suddenly this board saw an unusual influx of women hate threads.Is that so? I only saw a huge spam of basedjak images depicting the US or Israel in a bad way. There was one "does raping women improve morale?" thread
IDF turkey agrees
>>64948161>basedjakI didn't type that. basedjak s o y j a k
>>64930789>We shall fight them on the BITCHES
>>64946496Women fought on October 7th, both in Kitot Konenut (Ragtag Kibbutz response team) and on Merkava Mk3’s, apparently it even Has a wiki pagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israeli_female_tank_crew_fightNot just that but in Gaza footage there are tons of women paramedics, sure this isn’t frontline combat but they are more than just POGs. However there is dissent in putting them in combat roles, more amongst the religious types, as adding a woman soldier to a stinky APC full of sweaty men sitting there for hours produces ackward friction
>>64930769Having female soldiers is a luxury proposition only done by those so massively more powerful than their opponents that they can flaunt their superiority by introducing a crippling handicap and still win.All modern beliefs work that way.
>>64946445Wars are fought exclusively by right wing men you retard.Your enlightened liberal democracy god is the mastermind of all the butchery of the last 150 years, and will be the death of billions this generation. >>64946533Adding women to the workforce has completely fucked the entire world economy beyond repair. It's literally never going to recover. The entire world system is going to crash to the ground like a snapped chandelier leaving the survivors of the next two decades to rebuild from the fucking bedrock but hey, at least we paid a couple of generations of women to take fistfuls of bone rotting drugs every day and not have children, and that moral victory makes it all worth it.
Increasing the pool of recruits also means more capable recruits.
>>64948255I don't hate women, but letting them be in combat, or letting them be firefighters and cops is just ridiculous and literally gets people killed.
>>64940489not being fat is half the battle won, being above latitude 40 North is the other half
>>64940503NTA but it did, it was featured on semi-mainstream media because the Hamas gooners were saying typical shit like "we gonna breed you" etc
>>64931078This. England was on the verge of starvation even early into the war.
>>64948698>Wars are fought exclusively by right wing menCorrect. But only because none of them had the University degrees needed to make officer and be the one in charge of the whole thing.
>>64949324>>But only because none of them had the University degrees Oh man, you're in for a shock should you ever leave your house and meet an actual officer. Except maybe Navy.
>>64948773>>64948793Still waiting on your cuck fantasies.
>>64949440cuck shit is a yuropoor thing, thirdie
>>649312383 over 2 is crazy
>>64949334Are you that one anon who kept insisting Officers were a pointless feature in a military, and at the same time you shouldn't need a uni degree to get a commission?
>>64948722its honestly this simplealso frees up certain roles so better people can go to other roles
>>64945823>Even if you do just blanket say women can't take direct contact infantry roles, there's a billion other jobs they can be doing which to deny them is to just needlessly reduce the depth of your talent pool.Why can't you just up the pay and attract competend men from other fields into the military?
>>64949449More like a thirdie thing.
>>64951088yeah and Yurop is third world and the US is first world, thirdie. blacked was invented by a french guy, btw, thirdie
>>64951111(you) are trying too hard
>>64951120>you worship a Jewish dictatorBut I'm not American.
>>64951066Would that not still lead to an artificially smaller talent pool than if you'd upped the pay and also hired women?
>>64951142no gunz thirdie
>>64938270Still got BTFO by the turks lol
This of course expains why the DPRK has the second strongest military in the world; By law women are mandated to make up 20% of the active service and half the WPRG. With nearly 3 million women under arms their strength is self evident. There was a great speech about girl power for International Women's Day on Sunday:http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/ba27b0494562ef4e240b5d85dd59c748.kcmsf
>>64951066whynotboth.jpg
>>64951261>>64952503>Why cant da army jus be bigger fo evuhThere is no scenario where you adding a woman to the military is not subtracting a man. Sorry, but you just don't understand how armies are formed.
>>64951088>refusing to load the site on mobile platforms would instantaneously improve quality exponentiallyI hate phoneposters so much it's unreal.
>>64930769Countries that can afford to fill paper positions with diversity includes tend to have sufficient military supremacy that they can do so without undermining their effectiveness.
>>64930769>statisticallyhow many of the samples are the IDF?
>>64951340>Kurdish militia in Turkey eventually got BTFO by the second largest army in NATO after decadesThat isn't really an argument against them punching above their weight class
>>64948722Which is why Project 100,000 is remembered as a great success.
>>64930847What if they ran out of girls to use for cheerleaders so they had to use some crossdressing boys for cheerleaders instead
Incel, the thread.
>>64930769you know literally the first lesson in statistics as a subject is that correlation does not equal causation. Cleary it's a case of western militaries are so OP we can bring women along for the ride and it doesn't present too much of a hindrance.
>>64957828>we can bring women along for the ride and it doesn't present too much of a hindranceEvery army has had camp followers.The US has them wear uniforms and follow orders.
>>64956902Post your gun with timestamp
>>64948722>>64950792Statistically that's the exact opposite of what happens. Every single woman in the military is occupying a position that WOULD otherwise be filled by a man. Women in the Military are a luxury, prestige item that is all cost and no gain, except the gain in having shown off.
>>64951088>PCucks
>>64930769Cause generally the only countries that would even entertain this notion are western, which are ofc technologically more advanced. While countries that consist of 100% manly men usually rely on soviet era equipment
>>64961945>Every single woman in the military is occupying a position that WOULD otherwise be filled by a manThat's total bullshit.The military is not turning away from recruits, if they got more men, they would take them.
>>64962894just ignore the troll lol
>>64947634Spoken as someone who's never been and never will be anywhere near a combat arms MOS. Actually. Spoken as someone who probably has had very little pussy in life. Because if you did, you'd know that a woman wanting to be there does not mean anything.
>>64963151>a woman wanting to be there does not mean anythingIf someone is doing something that society and even some people try to discourage them from doing, you can infer that they are invested in doing that thing.>>64947634>NOT just following their girlfriendsOops.
>>64964712>anon doesn't understand the difference between wanting to have the job and wanting to do the jobNever mind combat arms, I'm starting to wonder if you've ever been employed at all.
>>64946296ELABORATE NIGGA
>>64965737On second look, I'm starting to doubt she exists but basically:There were rumors among US soldiers and surviving pows during the Vietnam war about a ruthless female Vietcong sniper/torture. Her torture methods were so brutal she was dubbed The Apache womanGot taken by legendary sniper Carlos Hancock aka White Feather as she was torturing some pows.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_(Viet_Cong_soldier)
>>64930769>have more money to waste on stupid worthless shit like making wammins feel like they contribute>therefore you have massive amounts of surplus case and and the logistical support to ensure your actual combat units can slaughter the enemyIt's a luxury used by libtard government so signal their libtard political orthodoxy to others. Simple as.Women as an aggregate are worthless in combat, total shit in every relevant metric from physical capability to technical aptitude to logistical burden. Even the top 0.01% isn't going to outperform a random slob if you conscripted him and beat him into shape for a year. Assuming of course the slob is white or maybe a jap, you can't fix stupid and race is real after all.TLDR: it's correlative relationship rather than a causative one
>>64965935It's more likely that much like the supposed Gook Aces it was people attributing the actions of many gooks to a single individual. Women being used to humiliate prisoners isn't that unusual, during Boudica's Revolt women would supposed torture Roman soldiers by boiling or flaying them. This is of course Roman propaganda just as the pro-Boudica propaganda claimed her family was raped and killed by Roman soldiers. But both are at least physically possible. From a shitskin perspective being tortured by women would be more humiliating because they are emotional creatures. Whereas to the white western mind once you've been captured you are under the power of the army/state which did the capturing. Any weakling can apply the pliers, that doesn't make them superior to you, you lost to the enemy army not some dumb cunt.I've actually been recently dealing with turdies who got a rude awakening when they had to deal with rural whites in America. They called them "heartless" "cruel" "monsters", not because of what they did but because they didn't treat the turdies or even themselves like people. Everything was nakedly transactional without any social graces. I think the equivalent for a non-libtard white guy would be talking to a Terminator, something is just off about him.
>>64946385>and can not be considered representative sample.This. Sample size is far to small to represent anything useful, statistically.
>>64930769I think it makes a lot of sense, since the military is technologically advanced enough where the human factor is reduced to a point where standards can be lowered.
>>64930796The Israeli army has lots of women by the men still fuck each other and rape pows.
statistically, armies with more soldiers are more likely to win a war - WHY IS THAT?!?!?!?!?!ftfy
>>64966236But women rarely serve as soldiers?When you mobilize a woman, you are rarely using her as a soldier.
>>64966513the bigger the military is, the more women serve military roles. the OP is retarded.
>>64961980rope, phoneposter
>>64965999That could be it, but the thought of the Apache woman gets my loins pumping. Idk guess I'm one of those sadomasochists freaksReally? The 3rd worlders think midwesterners are cold? I've met some myself and I think they're the sweetest Americans anyone will ever meet. So long as you respect their rules and traditions. 3rd worlders always seem to have the problem of being terrible guests so idk
>>64966513more men freed up to be soldiers
>>64930769Women in workforce=high human development indexWomen's rights=Europeans so good military tradition
>>64967238> The 3rd worlders think midwesterners are cold?These are the "donchan'know" Scandies of the midwest these are old pre-revolutionary stock from western PA. Also less "cold" then blunt and rude. Turdies expect those "below" them to bow and scrape and those "above" them to shit on them. Shitskins try to hide their greedy nature(ineffectively) while these people are up front and if they don't like they deal they tell you to fuck off and die.Of course it didn't help that I warned many the locals before hand of the shenanigans and we were able to fleece the mudmen for a mint. But people I had never spoken with and wouldn't have heard it on the grapevine also fleeced the retards. I made 40k for doing nothing, because money I ever stole in my life. They were basically trying to land with valuable mineral rights because an old boomer who wasn't properly racist told them about some opportunities. Since lying to them will never reflect poorly on me and I was under no legal obligation to to lie I did it, thereby denying them a foothold and fucking them out of money. The average man here is cruel, I'm actively malicious.
>>64967238>3rd worlders always seem to have the problem of being terrible guestsah but there's the rubit's always "they called me a nigger!" and then you inquire further and realise it was due to engaging in niggerly shenanigans>>64965999>during Boudica's Revolt women would supposed torture Roman soldiers by boiling or flaying them. This is of course Roman propaganda just as the pro-Boudica propaganda claimed her family was raped and killed by Roman soldiers. But both arewell-documented common practices in antiquity; hell all the way up to Napoleonic times. the genesis of modern laws of armed conflict was the clergy's horror at seeing all this and attempting to stop it
