what is the purpose of this abomination?
>>64964753mobile point air defense
>>64964753If someonne is hassling you with Temu planes and helicopters you can shoot them with your Temu AA gun
>>64964753costs 2 dollars and can blow up helicopters, drones and mulch infantry. bargain really
>>64964753Peak based Chink aesthetics
Kinda looks like the Goalkeeper if the Goalkeeper had a small penor
>>64964753Looks like an anti aircraft gun.
What an ugly fucking thing
>>64964753This has basically an upgraded version of the 35mm guns which are in the gepard, a copy of the oerlikon 35mm revolver gun.With frangible ammo the effective range is 5,5km against just about anything that flies.Dirt cheap point defense, highly effective.As long as you feed it (cheap) 35mm ammo you're save from mortar rounds, cruise missiles, helicopters, and all sorts of drones.There's a reason the ukrainians love the Gepard, it shreds.This one has a much bigger and more modern radar and a newer gun.
>>64964806that's not a 35mm gunthat's a 76mm gun
>>64964753To gay where no man has gayed before
>>64964753Judging by the camo pattern, I'm guessing it's to park on those islands they're building in the South China sea.
>>64964753chingchong anti-air howitzer
>>64964753Water levels.
>>64965014>China's 100-year plan builds artificial islands in the South China Sea>America just raises the sea level
>>64964806>highly effective.Okay, post dropped.
>>64966163>China's 100-year plan builds artificial islands in the South China Sea>America: Nice island, I think I'll take it.
>>64964753>HAHAHA! You have no idea how much of our defense budget this transfers into my offshore account!>Wait, you had the cameras running? >Shit, why didn't you tell me?>What I meant to say is that this will give the PLA a cutting edge, long range, highly effective anti-aircraft vehicle that the Americans will never be able to counter! Just look how cool our camo is! CHINA'S CENTURY BEGINS!!!!!!!
>>64964753It's a mobile way to protect assets from missiles and drones (and to a lesser extent helicopters/aircraft) with more magazine depth and cheaper munitions than using SAMs. I don't really understand which part of this is confusing. It's a longer range equivalent to the Gepard
Anyone else feel like there's a trend towards top-heavy equipment these days? Imagine trying to drive that thing through some steep and winding mountain passes.>>64966954Low-cost air defence apparently confuses and enrages the /k/ untermensch.
Cargo cult otomatic
