[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: unnamed-10.png (669 KB, 876x777)
669 KB
669 KB PNG
Stubby gun firing stubby shell with more volume for the shell than the casing. Starting from 75mm.
Will they ever make a come back for unmanned ground vehicle to occupy land at the lowest cost?
>Inb4 mortar
Logistically sound choice but muzzle autoloading is more awkward than breachloading and time fused beehive/net shot from arbitrary angle will be integral for swatting nasty flies if drone detection improves.
Plus a little more velocity.
>>
>>64991284
>Mortars
Breech loading mortars exist and you can just mount them on a dual-purpose turret.
>>
>>64991284
>75mm

Why would they when proven belt-fed 40mm systems exist?
>>
File: images (9).jpg (15 KB, 547x365)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>64991785
This.
>>
>>64992362
Cute.
I love box on wheels/track designs.
>>
File: Panzer III N.jpg (223 KB, 800x575)
223 KB
223 KB JPG
>>64991284
>>
>>64992329
40mm is good for lighter vehicle muting a firing position but it is not going to send the shell through the wall of a wood or brick house.
>>
>>64991284
https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2007/gun_missile/GMThurGS/DeVoePresentation.pdf
>>
>>64993768
HAHAHAA! Son, you have no idea.
>>
>>64993768
if I shoot 20 HEDP into your wood or brick house, it's going to be missing one or more walls
>>
File: wlhfn18a0ewa1.jpg (474 KB, 1853x1390)
474 KB
474 KB JPG
>*pomf*
>>
File: Churchill AVRE.jpg (54 KB, 634x419)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>64995008
>>
>>64991284
I'm surprised they didn't make any appearance in Ukraine from western lend-lease. I know there were never huge amounts of them, but surely there wear a few of the old engineering tanks laying around that they could have sent. Obviously they'd be of no use now, but they would have worked up until about late 2024. The Ukrainians really liked the HESH shells the Brits sent with the challengers and I remember old footage where a Ukrainian tank is just pumping round after round of HE into a russian trench (eventually running out of ammo and then grinding down the trench with it's treads). Surely a low velocity gun would have been better for the job.
>>
>>64995022
Buddy road trip movie except they're in the ETO and the car is an M8
>>
>>64995055
>Private, you see this Kraut pillbox?
>Yes sir!
>I don't want to
>>
File: AML-60-20 Serval.jpg (147 KB, 960x915)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
>>64991284
They are cool. The concept peaked with the M551 Sheridan imo. Serval is my favorite, 60mm mortar and 20mm autocannon combo
>>
File: file.png (1.73 MB, 1174x799)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB PNG
Also the concept is still in use with the BMP/BMD and the chinese knockoffs. 100mm low velocity gun which can also fire missiles.
>>
File: mkczxjrn3ff21.jpg (59 KB, 640x480)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>
>>64995055
and the modern-ish version with a 165mm
>>
>>
File: Char FCM 2Cbis 155mm.jpg (152 KB, 1501x898)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: 75mm M8 turret mexico.jpg (59 KB, 720x540)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>
>>64993768
Maybe not, but it will be sending fragments of wall and jets of copper into whatever is standing behind the wall
>>
>>
File: IMG_7743.jpg (1.56 MB, 1394x1014)
1.56 MB
1.56 MB JPG
>>64991284
I hope stubby guns make a comeback, I don’t care about effectiveness they’re peak design
>>
How would it fare in Ukraine?
>>
>>65000931
Someone explain to me the compass markings on Marine? Tanks. I can't see how it can be useful.
>>
>>65001020
Gives external spotters a reference to guide the gunner with
>>
File: small.jpg (17 KB, 612x408)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>64991284
>>
File: t72-yizhak-1.jpg (50 KB, 560x560)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>65001000
It is getting there. Takes time to evolve crabs.
>>
>>64992329
Explosive mass increases exponentially with diameter.
Of equal length, a 40mm shell has 1/4 the explosive mass of an 80mm shell.
Also a larger diameter shell has much more potential against armoured vehicles for rounds like HESH or HEAT.
>>
>>
>>
>>65002147
Faggot, I could put three HE 40's on the wall of any structure that wasn't rebarred concrete and blow a hole in it the size of your mother's cunt back in the day. And fuck right off thinking mid-bore low-velocity shit works like HEAT versus real armor. You're talking directly out of your ass so hard you've got projectile diarrhea of the mouth.
>>
>>65001020
This tank (Centaur Mk.IV) was used in Normandy, and the markings were drawn on to help the tank be used as indirect fire.
>>
File: IMG_7792.jpg (676 KB, 1058x624)
676 KB
676 KB JPG
>>64991284
Centurion AVRE my beloved.
>>
>>65001020
>>65004366
IIRC they were used for indirect fire while on the landing craft, basically acting like ersatz naval guns. These were also some of the few Centaur tanks to see any kind of combat.
>>
>>65004366
>help the tank be used as indirect fire
Yes, but HOW? It would be useful to have the azimuth marks painted on the inside of the landing craft the way Observer Corps pits had, but how would you use them for guiding a tank onto a target?
>>
>>65005523
*them > these
>>
>>65005523
The bearings are relative to the current facing of the turret from the perspective of the outside observer looking over the tank at the target. If you were standing directly in front of (and above) the gun looking at a target behind the tank, you would see it aligned with the 180 marking and be able to tell the gunner that the target is at his 180
>>
>>
File: japan 203mm short gun.jpg (29 KB, 441x292)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>
M113 FSV, low pressure 76mm gun from a Scorpion.
>>
File: M60A2_at_AAF_Museum.jpg (356 KB, 2272x1704)
356 KB
356 KB JPG
Always thought they should have made the 152mm on the Sheridan and M60A2 into a large-bore infantry support platform.
>>
File: 7.5 cm le.IG 18.jpg (69 KB, 720x550)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
The cutest!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.5_cm_leichtes_Infanteriegesch%C3%BCtz_18
>>
>>65009932
>H35
Technically an H39, has the longbarreled 37.
>>
>>65013800
we can go smaller!
>>
>>65008553
Makes sense. Thanks.
>>
>>64991284
Russians had this with bmp-3 but that vehicle was over designed. AAV had it with the 40mm but they got retired. It seems most militaries are obsessed with high velocity long range combat now so the infantry must suffer as always.
>>
>>
File: Sturmpanther 150mm.jpg (184 KB, 616x440)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
>>
File: 2b16-6.jpg (22 KB, 700x510)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
>>64991284
Always liked the NONA. Good modern system, 1980s Soviet system. Good low intensity size. Hybrid ammunition and also a mortar. Pic of the ammunition.
>>
File: AML 81mm.jpg (46 KB, 500x399)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>65021826
France did something similar, though with smaller 60mm and 81mm mortars, which could fire conventional HE or HEAT for use against tanks. They even developed an APDSFS projectile for the 60mm one, though it arguably performed worse than the HEAT ammo.
>>
>>



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.