[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How low can they go?
(Spoiler) you can only tie the record.

Also, no pictures of aircraft about to do gear-up landings.
>>
File: Sea Hawk 1964.jpg (483 KB, 2500x1668)
483 KB
483 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: .jpg (66 KB, 686x386)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>64999129
you do realize helicopters are aircrafts?
>>
File: low-cobra-flyby-video.jpg (86 KB, 1274x704)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>64999155
And they can only tie the record.
>>
File: C_130lowpassfalklands.jpg (59 KB, 800x600)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: file.png (336 KB, 1079x751)
336 KB
336 KB PNG
>>64999129
https://youtu.be/oKQiTUjHlQ4
>>
>>64999155
https://youtu.be/kly8soer0hY
Any excuse to post this.
>>
>>64999187
>Fat bitch Mig 23
>Massive fuckhuge R-29-300 engine
>With afterburners, has a 28,000lbf thrust
Holy fuck that must have been loud
>>
File: ad.jpg (60 KB, 720x478)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFD0Zyl_f0
>>
>>64999129
0 because all of them will land one way or another
>>
File: 342-FH_000746.jpg (706 KB, 4520x3518)
706 KB
706 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: flying low.webm (2.86 MB, 1280x720)
2.86 MB
2.86 MB WEBM
>>
File: Udet flying2.webm (2.04 MB, 640x408)
2.04 MB
2.04 MB WEBM
>>
File: 546467.png (859 KB, 828x828)
859 KB
859 KB PNG
>>
File: 1774218548561.jpg (54 KB, 700x421)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>
File: 1217687761579.jpg (97 KB, 740x600)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>
File: Way down we go.jpg (294 KB, 878x1508)
294 KB
294 KB JPG
>>64999166
It's possible to crash below sea level. I'm pretty sure the USAF has managed it.
>>
File: IMG_7393.jpg (263 KB, 945x2048)
263 KB
263 KB JPG
Happening tomorrow near me. Mite b cool
>>
File: 1000007047.jpg (169 KB, 1213x786)
169 KB
169 KB JPG
>>64999129
About 50cm below sea level if you start counting from the hull
>>
>>
File: 1773614054372326.jpg (77 KB, 697x516)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>64999769
>Death valley get very hot

Yea, what's up with that? Shouldn't it be cooler down there?
>>
File: battle_guadalcanal3.jpg (1.09 MB, 2575x1876)
1.09 MB
1.09 MB JPG
Some very low Bettys
>>
>>64999834
nigger couldn't scroll 3secs
>>
>>64999868
>2575x1876 vs. 740x600
>>
>>64999901
ok yours is bigger but you are the second one. If you know what I mean ;)
>>
File: 1650138381817.webm (1.58 MB, 891x500)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB WEBM
WOOP WOOP
PULL UP
WOOP WOOP
PULL UP
TERRAIN TERRAIN
WOOP WOOP
>>
File: giphy-downsized.gif (466 KB, 245x132)
466 KB
466 KB GIF
>>64999129
Ok?
>>
>>65000027
One of my favorite movies.
>>
File: Blenheims_flying_low.jpg (39 KB, 450x313)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>
>>64999769
>I'm pretty sure the USAF has managed it.
therefore the record can only be tied, correct?
>>
>>65000034
I'm going to dig a 50 foot hole at the bottom of death valley and crash a plane into it. what then, huh?
>>
>>65000044
I'll dig a 51 foot hole and crash into that, what now bitch
>>
>>65000044
I'd simply crash a plane into your mother's funhole
>>
File: Ray_Red1_low.jpg (184 KB, 1280x887)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
>>
File: Jaag.jpg (36 KB, 765x371)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>
File: heads_up2.jpg (40 KB, 699x526)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>65000310
>>
File: f-16 show of force.webm (626 KB, 1280x714)
626 KB
626 KB WEBM
>>
File: fly by.webm (1.01 MB, 720x632)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB WEBM
>>
File: raaf.jpg (195 KB, 1080x969)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxSyKSR_c3g
>>
>>64999129
You can go as low as the ground in class e airspace if I’m not mistaken?
>>
File: 1762244095684293.webm (2.67 MB, 640x480)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB WEBM
>>
File: 1774000337079902.webm (1.54 MB, 480x360)
1.54 MB
1.54 MB WEBM
>>
>>64999166
They could fly through a cave if it was big enough.
>>
File: T2.jpg (41 KB, 600x338)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>64999155
>>
Any videos of a B52 doing that?
>>
File: FairchildB52Crash.jpg (54 KB, 682x520)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>65000813
not exactly...
>>
>>65000829
recoverable
>>
File: USS-Ranger-B-52.jpg (205 KB, 1200x628)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
>>65000813
The best we got is B52 doing this
>>
File: 1771754055018427.png (189 KB, 600x400)
189 KB
189 KB PNG
>>
File: mirage f1 low pass.webm (2.22 MB, 512x384)
2.22 MB
2.22 MB WEBM
>>
>>65000718
That sh1t is so cool it's even better that it's normal over there.
>>
>>65000905
Piled it in seconds later just beyond the ammo dump. There is a video of the same guy just missing a ridge line by about ten feet.
>>
File: 1771880233855829.png (1.32 MB, 1199x962)
1.32 MB
1.32 MB PNG
>>
>>65000914
I'm trying to find the video of a Vulcan flying between two hangars. It's potatovision but it exists.
>>
>>65000829
Someone in that pic had already pulled the handle you can see the hatch/cover.
>>
>>65001087
Yeah, that's the co-pilot (they didn't make it)
>>
File: B'burn Bucaneer.jpg (32 KB, 674x437)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
Pic Related, Buccaneer stretching the upper limit of its maximum altitude
>>
>>65000760
naval aviation is so fucking cool
imagine screaming 30ft over choppy Atlantic waves towards some Soviet battlegroup
then you punch the afterburner, the whole plane shudders, your controls invert, you lose wing-in-ground effect and you've left the scream of your own engines far behind you
only the thrum of the fuselage is left as you head in for death and glory
you wake up the B-61 and prepare your last pull-up maneuver
>>
>>65000718
TERRAIN TERRAIN
>>
>>65001120
Buccaneer pilots climb to give the landing gear somewhere to go.
>>
>>65001130
Frog never flew suicide missions with their naval aviation, BUT they had a land based nuclear bomber that was designed to do a no return strike into Russia called the Mirage IV that involved doing exactly what you described
>>
>>65000996
posting the legendary video :
https://youtu.be/3oY4iqXxy2k
>>
>>65001206
I thought the carrier-based Mirage IIIM was nuclear certified?
>>
>>65001216
can't tell if you are trolling or if you really believe it lmao
>>
>>65001219
honest question
this is all way before my time
>>
>>65001234
npnp, the mirage 3M is from the Metalstorm game. Frogs carried the nuke using etendards and super etendards before the rafale. No mirage ever took off from a carrier. There was a small time window when they did use a gravity bomb with the etendards before adopting stand off nukes
>>
>>65001209
insanity
>>65001252
many thanks
>>
>>65001209
>be frog
>flying at machfuck to the bomb the nearest nigger village
>turn on the ground following system
>hopefully the electronics just werks
>hopefully the code just werks
>hopefully the maintenance guy did it's job
>hopefully there won't be a tree higher than 3m
>hopefully birds will leave me alone
>hopefully no giraffe either
>sets the fucking system to 3m above the ground
>meh it works
>if something bad happens you have 500ms to react
>check the fucking map while piloting
this video is insane
>>
>>65001275
suddenly not knowing where you are is one of those bad things that might happen
>>
>>65001206
IV didn't really have the range to get home. If ALL the nukes were in the air then anywhere flat and long enough would do. The Brits knew the same, there homes wouldn't be there to go home to.
Weren't there Nuke Skyraiders with a one way plan.
>>
File: SU-24.png (355 KB, 623x1080)
355 KB
355 KB PNG
>>>/wsg/6114907
>>
File: F-18 going downtown.jpg (840 KB, 3000x2250)
840 KB
840 KB JPG
>>65000718
>>
>>65001405
>>
>>65000305
Ray Hanna, the absolute mad lad:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brd44OS0Ueo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUHpkv27uGc
>>
>>65001569
Was trying to find a higher quality version of the image you posted
>>
>>64999129
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJa-cbhH1dI
>>
>>65001595
The pattern is full...
Of Connie.
>>
>>65001569
I have the Spit pass saved as oh F* oh F* he was told to make it low. I like how he is climbing over the presenter.
>>
File: s8pu3o8k09z51.png (1.26 MB, 1024x685)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB PNG
>>
RAF Buccaneer pilots were a different breed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24CaLD8l0OE

describing taking part in the Red Flag exercises in the US:

>"and we descended to low level, say to about 100 feet initially... And as we came into the CAP area, we've got a Combat air Patrol ahead of you, we descend down to oh, about 10 feet, something like that, about 550 knots..."

>"but we found that, you know, at that height, we were leaving dust trails, so we climbed to 20 feet..."
>>
a classic
>>
>>65001275
chad is literally one of the flattest countries on earth, there's endless expanses of nothing and fuckall in every direction for longer than your fuel will probably last. I would feel pretty safe just turning on the autopilot and checking my phone.
>>
Look at footage here : >>64945465
>>
File: 1758331056400856.png (79 KB, 320x160)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
>All this low altitude flying
Say "Thank you AIRPASS II"
>>
>>65001315
PIZDETS!
>>
>>65001677
absolute madlad
>>
>>65001405
>IT'S STAR-SCREAM!!!
>>
>>65001930
Someone allegedly lost a wing tip.
Vulcans nuking America was an interesting exercise thing, after the second successful one they decided to stop inviting us.
>>
>>65001694
Yeah, a classic blunder.
The pilot didn't hit the sign from flying low, the retard hit the sign while showboating a T&G on a highway.
>>
>>65002022
it's a wonder it didn't get sucked in
>>
>>65001275
>he thinks the mirage F1 has a ground following radar

There's an EF-111 that claimed a maneuver kill on an iraqui mirage F1 that was trying to follow it while it was using the terrain following radar.

The mirage F1 doesn't even have fly by wire, all the flying in the video was manual.
>>
>>65002011
I saw a Vulcan irl, sadly didn't also hear it
beautiful
were they running across the Atlantic all the way or what
>>
>>65000027
>>65000028

They. REALLY. Lived.
>>
>>65002084
>were they running across the Atlantic all the way or what
NTA but during Exercise Sky Shield II four Vulcans from 83 Squadron flew from Lossiemouth, the other four took off from Bermuda and made simulated bombing runs on targets within the US without being detected (using lessons for effective jamming learned by Bomber Command during Exercise Ardent 10 years earlier)
>>
>>65002122
I wasn't a fan of the ending, though. The yacht and helicopter thing was kinda dumb.
Supposedly there is a alternate ending floating around out there, but I haven't seen it.
>>
>>65002161
>Exercise Ardent
??Ultimately the main learning opportunity for Bomber Command was the effective use of jamming. In particular, they learned that the trick to use against jet-powered aircraft was not to attempt to draw the fighters away from the bombers, as had been the case in WWII, because the jet fighters could quickly reposition against the bombers when the jamming aircraft moved away. Instead, the jammers should be used to draw the fighters into the air in advance of the bomber's arrival, timing it so the fighters would run out of fuel and return to base just as the bombers appeared.
very interesting
>>
File: 1752924373447277.png (975 KB, 835x1200)
975 KB
975 KB PNG
>>65000829
>>
>>65002062
Even crazier then
>>
>>65000714
I live under an occasional flight range and have gotten zoomed by fighters a couple of times. Not quite that low and on pavement but about as fast. It's intimidating as fuck and absolutely glorious as a taxpayer.
>>
>>64999129
Pretty low, like 10-15 feet.
>>
>>65003150
I would like to point out that i'm reasonably sure this is Mehi from @studyjuche narrating this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmqI6NMR-X0

And that you should like or subscribe to her for her sake. She seems to be a good person.
>>
File: 39793.jpg (1.23 MB, 1600x1092)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB JPG
>>65002259
there is something so elegent about that fat fuck in flight, its like a manta ray.
>>
File: 1774329577287.jpg (54 KB, 736x474)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>
>>65001209
Nice, have their Moroccan friends from a time before pixels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCyR5yzj21g

>>65001275
If you're French and flying in Africa, you hug the ground. Doesn't matter if you're flying a shitbox single prop or a fighter jet, you just do. Dem be the rules.
>>
Convair proved that the b-58 could do low level bombing missions and was developing a terrain following radar, but unfortunately that wasn't enough to stop macnamera from cancelling it in favour of the f-111.

https://youtu.be/yFPgur_cUmA
>>
>>65003219
Oh that's what it reminds me of. Thx.
>>
File: 1744936269526835.png (2.08 MB, 1600x1085)
2.08 MB
2.08 MB PNG
>>
>>65001411
>what's going on in here?
>>
>>64999190
>airwolf theme
Got a smile out of me.
>>
>>65001315
Somehow the schnoz on that Fencer seems even longer in this still frame than normal.
>>
>>65001595
Constellation my beloved.
>>
>>65003720
Vark! Vark Vark Vark!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN9jU4NW9K0
>>
File: hw97karbine.webm (3.66 MB, 656x480)
3.66 MB
3.66 MB WEBM
>>
>>65004688
torpedoes?
>>
>>65004697
Starting from the second wave, yeah.
>>
>>65004707
you'd think they would drop them from a mile out or something... ballsy pilots
>>
>>65004688
For as insane as modern warfare is, there's something special about even air-to-sea warfare having just about involved making eye contact.
To say nothing of shooting at each other with rube goldberg machines and doohickeys because someone worked out that if you set up a gear ratio just right you can make your sights stay aligned with your gun traverse, or that somehow an exact ratio of movement of a capstone against a wheel in enough different configurations hooked up together allows you to calculate your firing solution for the ship's guns.
>>65004732
The further out you are, the more your alignment matters and the more time the ship has to react and avoid your munitions. Remember these things aren't guided, they'll just scoot off in whatever direction they happen to be facing in when they hit the water. The maths to do longer ranged shots is also hard enough with all the mechanical computers that a submarine had to help out, with a plane you gotta eyeball it.
>>
>>65004755
you can eyeball it with a submarine too, but it's harder to get into a firing position where it's easy to eyeball it
I think many things in WW2 were done wrong for the technology of the time
like, if I wanted to sink convoys I'd build 100 long range torpedo bombers not 10 submarines
>>
NASA isn't just about space...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFz326Rzr-Q
>>
File: picture_268.jpg (51 KB, 700x463)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>
File: lkpnznxjao351.png (590 KB, 1200x872)
590 KB
590 KB PNG
>>
File: 1527269109083.jpg (122 KB, 640x557)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>65002022
Kek I'd never seen that.
>>
>>65001569
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljofhhdDGPo
>>
File: image0-8.jpg (124 KB, 602x752)
124 KB
124 KB JPG
>>
>>65010279
It reminds me of that one.
>>
>>65001569
Came here to post about Ray Hanna
>>
File: Alan Pollock.jpg (2.19 MB, 3167x4167)
2.19 MB
2.19 MB JPG
>>
>>65001411
Aussies allow this? Based
>>
>>65019217
Im a burger but i love these old RAF mad lads. Massive respect
>>
File: IMG_7222.jpg (166 KB, 1500x1000)
166 KB
166 KB JPG
>>65017569
>…and one Union general!
>>
>>65001130
>your controls invert
wut
>you lose wing-in-ground effect
at 30' in a fighter you never had it
>>
>>65020517
>wut
> In the simplest analytic model, leading- and trailing-edge control surfaces generate rolling moments by changing the effective airfoil camber of the wing. At high dynamic pressure, the control deflections and torsional flexibility of the wing complicate this simple concept by changing the local angle of attack across the wingspan as it rotates in relation to its elastic axis. For trailing-edge control surfaces, the changes in airfoil camber tend to dominate at low dynamic pressure; but as dynamic pressure increases, their roll control effectiveness tends to be reduced because of reduction in local angle of attack. The limit condition for this effect is referred to as aileron reversal and has typically forced the control designer to consider alternate means to provide roll control in this part of the flight envelope.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050204120.pdf
>>
>>
>>65020035
That's Chuck Norris.
>>
File: file.png (195 KB, 556x358)
195 KB
195 KB PNG
Can't find a better quality version but have a Lancaster flying under the Sydney Harbor Bridge
>>
>>65020754
okay but you're not flying the aeroelastic f-18 nor are you flying a subsonic aircraft faster than it was designed to go. the controls still work in the same way.
>>
File: F-35 low.webm (648 KB, 464x848)
648 KB
648 KB WEBM
>>
Bump
>>
>>65000718
The first time I saw this video I could feel my ass puckering in fear.
>>
>>65019375
They occasionally do low altitude training in Brisbane, and have done similar flyovers as part of the city's Riverfire festival. Brisvegas doesn't have a whole lot else going on so the air force puts on a show.
>>65024670
You really don't expect a plane the size of the C-17 to be able to move like the C-17 can.
>>
Going supersonic at airshows might not be the wisest idea...

https://youtu.be/podqKi-q04w?si=8BoZc-unHmjgL3a4
>>
File: kc-135-low-flyby.jpg (85 KB, 1274x704)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>
>>65000013
Holy shit, an uncrashed DC10
>>
>>65027009
Holy shit I thought the "broken windows" meme was a meme
>>
>>65028101
It's a meme for high altitude supersonic transports, but very much true for low level.
>>
>>65028101
lmao every east german grandma can tell you of broken windows because of low flying fishbeds
>>
All the movie is worth watching, but it also has some great low level footage.

https://youtu.be/JGslsS_3A68?si=Tppk1r-svXIeRLcj
>>
>>65030752
>M2K pornography
Thank God I'm over 18
>>
>>64999179
This picture would be even funnier if you erased the 130 entirely.
>>
>>65000717
He flew right into the sun what an IDIOT!
>>
Post ukie stuff like those helis flying barely a few feet of the ground
>>
>>65001411
>Hey kids
>Wanna bash some emus?
>>
File: low flying choppers.webm (2.92 MB, 576x1024)
2.92 MB
2.92 MB WEBM
>>65032861



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.