[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Project Grayburn.jpg (1.43 MB, 4092x3500)
1.43 MB
1.43 MB JPG
The Bongland Army is set to adopt a new standard issue cervix rifle. Hedge your bets here. The contenders are:
>Beretta NARP
>Sako M23
>SIG MCX
>SIG M7
>HK416
>HK433
>CZ BREN 3
>KAC KS-1
>SCAR-L
>SCAR-H
As you can see, the tender hasn't specified the rifle should be 5.56 NATO and seems to allow for non standard calibres

Even though it's not listed here (or in any official sources I've read) The Canadians recently adopted a new service rifle and seeing as Britain had adopted C7s and C8s in limited capacity before. I think it's reasonable to assume the CMAR is in the running too.

There was also a Jeet company which announced its desire to compete. The comments section of the yt video taking about it was full of Jeets pretending to be white and glazing India kek
>>
>>65008037
>Project Graybrun
*Project Grayburn, typo
>>
>be bongland
>start industrial revolution
>conquer ¼ of earth
>make more guns than anyone else
>be on the winning side of both world wars
>surrender your empire for jews
>export your industrial base
>import browns to rape your children
>need a new military rifle
>can't even domestically produce one
>have less military industry than Finland
>pay TV license
>die
>>
I like the Sako
>>
File: Capture.jpg (33 KB, 497x478)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
>>65008138
>>
>>65008179
What, the UK?
>>
>>65008293
Bodied that freak.
>>
File: Capture.jpg (19 KB, 658x147)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>65008315
>Bodied that fre-ACK!
>>
>>65008037
I'm fine with anything but the SIGs or the SCARs
>>
>>65008037
luv me sum bren 3
>>65008138
>t.butthurt jeet
>>
SCAR 17 in 6.5 Cree- just kidding, .25-08, just for fun.
>>
>>65008037
The last time Bongs adopted a Bren they won a world war with it. That’s all you need to know.
>>
>>65008774
>>65008791
The Bren has a pretty good shot at winning the trial because it's also quite cost effective. iirc I read somewhere the only rifle that worried HK for the Germany contract was the Bren
>>
>>65008037
Does the fact HK helped fix the L85 weight in on picking the 416? Or is command resentful of the krauts helping out?
>>
>>65008037
The sigger furry rifle is probably gonna win because of political meddling and general retardation. Plus England consistently fucks up acquisitions so it'd make sense they'd adopt the worst rifle available (unless the jeets really do show up with a gun)
>>
>>65008832
It helps a decent amount because of the HK facilities already in the UK which means it's easier for them to set up local production as stipulated in the tender.

Anyway I'm probably already beating a dead horse but, HK were owned by Royal Ordnance at the time.
>>
File: hunter-posters-copy.png (1.25 MB, 1609x1133)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB PNG
>>65008037
Marines already use KAC so thats my money
>>
>>65008850
I was of the same camp but, the KAC seems too expensive for general issue
>>
>>65008037
We've discussed these before if anyone wants a recap for some reason.
>>61157018
>>62629245
>>63884762
>>64407879
>>
>>65008861
Damn, I don't remember seeing any of those threads I suppose they came and went fairly quickly. How long do you reckon it'll take them to decide? apparently it could happen this year
>>
>>65009261
>Damn, I don't remember seeing any of those threads
Some are from 2024, some are from 2025.
>How long do you reckon it'll take them to decide?
Depends on how much government corruption is involved. The military has already tested the designs, and the companies have already placed their bids. Now the British wait for their government paper pushers to stop being overly bureaucratic and finally decide.
>>
>>65009338
Which one is your money on?
>>
File: dead meme.png (439 KB, 1265x1080)
439 KB
439 KB PNG
>>65008037
Krauts just picked up a CZ service pistol, so I wouldn't be surprised if they go for the Bren 3. The Berettas and HKs maybe, if they can sell them at a decent price. I think KAC is a little too pricey for the procurement guys to approve it. KAC alongside Sig are gonna be at a political disadvantage regardless of performance, because they're coming from the wrong side of the pond.
>SCARs for standard issue
Lol, lmao.
>>
>>65008850
See>>65008859
their marine corps is small with somewhere between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on how you measure, but also has the most comprehensive training for basic infantry in the world. The British army is like 80,000-100,000 depending on how you measure. KAC might be expensive for the army.
>>
>>65009346
I believe it'll be the BREN (cheapest option there) or the HK (the British are in love with HK and SIG products). There's a small chance the 5.56 MCX wins, but I find it highly unlikely that the M7 wins. Everything else on the list might work well but won't beat the BREN's value, nor do their companies have the pull that those German companies have on British firearm procurement.
>>
>>65009397
>Sig are gonna be at a political disadvantage regardless of performance, because they're coming from the wrong side of the pond.
The 5.56 MCX would be made in the German SIG factories.
>>
i'd put my money on 416 or Bren, MCX as a wildcard because SIG knows that one weird trick to win bids.
>>
>>65008037
>SIG M7
>pleaseGoditwouldbesofuckingfunny
This board might actually have a stroke
>>65008393
>2021
Mohammad Bin Al-Londini with the jokes over here
>>
>>65009420
>The 5.56 MCX would be made in the German SIG factories.
They have to be produced under license in Britain anyway
>>
>>65009413
Same in terms of likelihood I think it's
1. Bren 3
2. HK416
3. M7
I actually think the M7 is a decent chance of being selected if the CZ or HK aren't by virtue of the calibre. If the MoD ignores them it would probably mean it's not interested in 5.56 anymore
>>
I hope they pick the HK 433 because it's new and cool looking. Continued 416 supremacy would also be neat. The HK factory already in the UK certainly gives HK a leg up.
>>
>>65009425
If sig is going to pull shenanigans then they're getting the M7, possibly by telling the MoD boomers about the PKM and muh overmatch and saying it'd reestablish trust in NATO or some shit
>>
>>65008037
>433
Never ever, that one is a victim of Hak's own success
>>
>>65008138
t. seething streetshitter
>>
>>65009654
Unironcally and it's kind of a shame. They've effectively made the de facto rifle of the west and now can't pitch a rifle that's generally better because who the hell is gonna buy the other HK instead of the HK everyone and their dog is getting?
>>
>>65008037
either Sako or KAC
>>
>>65009682
How about you sako on this kac, bitch?
>>
>>65008037
Bren is cheap and at the very least previous iterations proved reliable and decently robust (-charging handle) in ukraine. 416 might win just because everyone else is getting it and have placed decently large orders.
>>
>>65009654
>>65009672
I love the look of it but there's not really a big enough change let alone improvement to warrant paying to tool up for a new rifle
>>
>>65009507
What would compel them to go with the M7?
>>
>>65009338
>The military has already tested the designs
any publicly available results?
>>
>>65009724
merchant tricks
>>
>>65009724
The caliber. He already mentioned the caliber of the M7 would be the only reason it would be adopted in lieu of the previously mentioned superior rifles
>>
>>65009672
>Make dependable lightweight rifle
>Yurope shuns it for heavy plastic gay rifles
>Germany makes a heavier, pricer, more prone to a broken bolt AR
>Gyros buy them up in droves
I just don't get it anons
>>
>>65009830
Euros are even worse than Canada with their closeted desire to be American. They can't even adopt a regular AR, it had to be proprietary for no good reason so its un-American enough for their sensibilities
>>
>>65009507
Interesting, mine were
1. BREN
2. HK 416
3. SIG MCX 5.56
4. HK 433
>>
>>65009483
Oh, even more reason "being on the wrong side of the pong" isn't an issue.
>>
>>65008774
>>65009667
What makes you think jeets are mad? Jeets are cheering for the current state of the UK, being brown there is like living in a 24/7 porno, you can snatch any schoolgirl you want right off the streets and the cops will cover it up and arrest the parents if they complain. Must be amazing desu.
>>
>>65009724
shared ammo with the US and better stopping power/range than any 7.62
>>
File: bribery.jpg (51 KB, 1000x667)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>65009728
>Companies with well designed products hate him! See how SIG wins all the government contracts with this one simple trick
>>
File: MoD.jpg (37 KB, 449x461)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>65008037
>Project Gaybum
NARP for the LARP.
>>
Why don't they just put together a generic AR-15 on their own like the Koreans did?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dasan_Machineries_DSAR-15
>>
>>65011054
Because we live in Europe and can literally just go ask FN, H&K or like a dozen other world class gun makers about it.
>>
>>65011086
Something, something, National pride, something, something, Self-reliance and domestic industry O Algo
>>
>>65011089
We can also go ask them to set up a factory here (and in fact many of them already have one).
>>
>>65008037
HK416 or sig
>>
>>65008037
Just adopt the hk416 and get it over with
>>65011095
Hk416 is basically nato's standard issue rifle at this point (France Germany us Marines Norway turkey to a degree since mpt55/76 started out as a carbon copy of the 416)
>>
>>65011100
I kinda wanna adopt the Bren or the HK433 just to have the controls be a little different from the Ar-15 and 416
>>
>>65011112
You're gonna adopt the AR-15 like the most of nato's big armies and you're gonna like it resistance is futile
Funnily enough if the mpt series of rifles we'rent a thing could have seen the 433 replace the hk33 with G3 being modernized instead
>Turk
>>
>>65011054
No small arms industry big enough to produce the rifles.
>>
I am so fucking sick of "Ar-15 but piston"
>>
>>65011126
Why? The concept was created by Delta Force
>>
>>65011147
Boring and oversaturated
>>
>>65011150
You will wear your multicam uniform generic plate carrier and ops core helmet, wield your piston AR-15 and You will like it!
>>
>>65011147
>Created by Delta Force
Popularized while they worked the kinks out of 10.3" di guns. You'll notice the 416 doesn't show up much anymore.
>>
File: images.jpg (53 KB, 731x419)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>65008037
>Adopt proven FN design, the SCAR-H
>Use the long barrel variant
>Paint it suncorite black
>Make it semi-automatic only
Fuck it, welcome back SLR.
>>
>>65008179
>61%
>White alone percent74.8%
From the US Census Bureau.
>>
>>65011122
?
>>
>>65008037
Realistically? 416, it's practically the standard rifle of NATO and is pretty solidly established. Possibly? M7 due to typical SIG tomfoolery and MoD boomers getting sold on extra range and muh powah. Funny? VHS-2 outta nowhere, more bullpup because fuck you all
>>
>>65008037
>am unbiased czechfag
obviously bren
>to keep at british rifle adoption brilliance
sig m7
>pls not yet another AR
hk433
>actual rational choice
kac since AR and their other branches already adopted it
>>
Bren 3
>>
>>65008037
They will pick one that folds as a middle ground solution to the bullpup question.
Bren is cool but VBSS already uses the MCX so thats where I bet.
>>
>>65008037
Wasn't it down to the NARP/Sako (both owned by Beretta?) Everyone like a year ago made it sound like it was a choice between the two.
>>
>>65008037
If it was life or death I would pick the 416 because of it’s track record
>>
>>65008774
>t.butthurt jeet
nigger there aren't any butthurt jeets they're too busy raping bong women

>>65008832
hk was british owned at that time. that's no longer the case.
>>
>>65009672
>They've effectively made the de facto rifle of the west
lol
>>
>>65011446
>White alone is closer to 59-56%
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2024.B03002?q=B03002+United+States+plus+Puerto+Rico+2024
>>
>>65012245
It's more or less the FAL of its time at this point.
>>
>>65008037
Why aren't Colt Canada in the competition?
>>
>>65012735
idk, they were specifically excluded from the ranger rifle trial as well, so there's clearly some bad blood there.
>>
>>65008037
>SIG M7
There would be a huge shitstorm if sig m7 somehow won.
>>
>>65012967
I actually think if the UK modified the SIG XM8/M8 to remove the AR charging handle and remove a bit more height and mass that it would actually be the most forward thinking rifle. Every other gun is 20+ year old technology and offers nothing future proof. Yes the ammo for the SIG is heavier but if they can get the m8 under 7 pounds with a mfmd suppressor nobody would have a better rifle on the planet.
>>
>>65008037
Hopefully the HK416, European armies should be generally looking towards standardization in equipment.
>>
>>65011446
>counts asians as white
>counts latinx as white
>>
>>65013276
>Every other gun is 20+ year old technology and offers nothing future proof.
Theres nothing future proof about change for changes sake.
>>
>>65013276
>Every other gun is 20+ year old technology and offers nothing future proof.
So, is the sig. What are you talking about?
>>
>>65011676
Bren is the cheapest and is still a really good rifle so, it has a really good chance. I think it's a tight race between the Bren and the HK416.

>>65009724
For ammunition parity with the US
>>
>>65013558
>>65014497
None of the other guns can push a 121 grain projectile 3000 feet per second out of a 11 inch barrel
>>
>>65016694
So? A faster heavier projectile is not automatically future proofed, or else we would never have ditched 30.06.
>>
>>65016707
Why would any military want a flatter trajectory, less wind drift, longer effective range, more muzzle energy, better sectional density, better ballistic coefficient, better retained energy, lighter weight 7.62 NATO replacement that is the size of a SMG
>>
>>65012317
>>65013547
>white alone
>no it-
Read nigger.
>>
>>65009507
Can CZ start making Brens chambered in 6.8 Common? They already have a version of the Bren for 7.62x51 an I wrong?
>>
>>65016749
Because the bulk of that shit doesn't matter for an infantry carbine. The most crucial traits of a rifle is that it be lightweight, controllable and carry a lot of ammo. The M7 is a regression in all those fields. Trajectory, BC and sectional density are considerations for a DMR or MMG, which makes sense as the M7 is literally a repackaged failed CSASS bid, but borderline irrelevant for a mass issued rifle. You're there to make noise to keep people in place for artillery or vehicles to mop them up, infantry squads doing leet sniping is fantasy.
>7.62 NATO replacement that is the size of a SMG
I assume your point of reference here is some shit from WW2, because no SMG fielded in living memory is that big.
>>
I still don't get why they misspelled grey
>>
>>65008037
Its going to be something made by Sig so who cares
>>
>>65008138
Grim
>>
>>65008037
I want it to be the SCAR but accept that reality is far too gay for that to ever actually happen
>>
>>65017454
516G3 maybe?
>>
>>65016790
idk, it might be like something like the 10mm auto vs .45 acp situation but for rifles

>>65017460
you actually like the scar?
>>
>>65017261
I think it might be named after this guy who won a VC at Arnhem:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Grayburn
>>
>>65016790
>6.8 Common
I had to look it up to see if it was a new cartridge. I had no idea we already had a third name for the military cartridge.
>They already have a version of the Bren for 7.62x51 an I wrong?
The BREN 2 could be bought in .308. The BREN 3, on the other hand, does not have a .308 version ready yet.

>>65017867
>you actually like the scar?
NTA. Why not? The original ones had flaws but the design has been improved multiple times.
>>
>>65018383
>Why not?
It's still really expensive and nowhere near as good as the other rifles on the list I always found it ugly too
>>
>>65019211
>It's still really expensive
A total non-issue for the military; they are using .50 cal belt-feds, and you think they can't buy and use these?
>nowhere near as good as the other rifles on the list
To my understanding, its issues have been fixed. It is a reliable rifle.
>I always found it ugly too
Fair enough.
>>
>>65009420
There are no german SIG factories
>>
>>65008393
>Believing ANY data from the UK government
Lol. LMAO, even.
>>
>>65009667
You should greentext that, stupid fucking butthurt subject newfag.
Don't you have aome sisters or daughters to beliver to a muzzie rape gang before you get arrested for a hate crime?
>>
>>65011607
What of that did you possibly not understand?
>>
>>65021799
Alright Chuddah, you can go to bed now
>>
>>65022036
Based chuddah is always right, I appreciate you conceding
>>
File: Self Licking Rifle.jpg (17 KB, 600x124)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>65008037
The SCAR-H, but built domestically, to imperial units, with a much longer barrel, and redesigned furniture that looks an awful lot like pic related.
>>
>>65026112
And with this oil crisis happening it would be better to make the furniture from a more sustainable material like, say.. wood
>>
>>65026203
Exactly, and with the likely upgrades in small arms sights technology that are likely to happen in the next few years it's probably better to leave the baseline Grayburn rifle with just its integral iron sights at the point of production - making it easy to integrate new future sights into the rifle later down the line!
>>
>>65026112
>>65026203
>>65026251
True but you gotta admit it's definitely an ugly rifle like that.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.