[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Murica.png (480 KB, 1454x758)
480 KB
480 KB PNG
HK 33 5.56 and rebrands AP 53, etc
HK 51 7.62/308 and rebrands AP51...

Is the purpose of the short bbl so it's also a flashbang?

The more practical versions of the longer originals make sense. Mission particulars, that require something more compact.
HK G3/91k, 12.69" bbl, understandable.
HK33k, 12.4-12.7, understandable.

The physics dictates the 7.62x51 in a 8.3bbl is less effective than an 7.62x39.

Is this what Americans want?
Or is this what companies think Americans want?
Do people want the mid range length (12.3") at all?
Is the American consumer driven/distracted by packaging, appearance, general consumerism.. to spend and consume on "New"?

Assuming practicality does not come into the 80% population consumer mind.

INB4, Murica f*ck yeah!
>>
>>65018729
>Is this what Americans want?
The military rifles they were based on HK53 and MC51, were requested by the British SAS
They wanted rifle-calibre weapons with around a 22-inch OAL because that was the typical size of the glove compartment on a car
>>
>>65018729
Because those guns predated modern short barrel optimized calibres and it was the Cold War so the West wasn't exactly swimming in surplus Soviet/Chinese ammo?
>>
Because they are fucking fun to shoot, something a nogunz eurocuck won’t understand
>>
File: 1444203739072.jpg (27 KB, 800x521)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>65018729
>8.3" bbl
Too long.
51K master race
>>
>>65018729
Because fuck having arm hair and functional ear drums
>>
File: g3barrel.jpg (50 KB, 794x596)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>
File: IMG_4212.jpg (389 KB, 839x814)
389 KB
389 KB JPG
>hk is so innovative they invented the 10.5 inch PSA ar-15 before anyone else
>>
>>65018788
No way that thing fits in a glove compartment
>>
>>65018788
>>65018810
The 8.3" versions were rare and obscure.
They had a few for special forces missions.
>Need shorty for a dozen people
>Make 308 shorter
>Job done

Seems the 8.3" is the only thing readily available in the States.
Which seems odd.
>>
File: IMG_1132.jpg (668 KB, 1925x1197)
668 KB
668 KB JPG
Because it’s sick AF.

Everyone hear is a LARPer in some fashion, and this thing is perfect for all your millennial larping needs.
>>
>>65019380
Yep, that's going in my based collection.
Nice gun
>>
File: p63z69qjpvm11[1].jpg (111 KB, 1280x720)
111 KB
111 KB JPG
>>65018971
Maybe in door cutouts
>>
File: IMG_20260329_071650.jpg (972 KB, 1500x2000)
972 KB
972 KB JPG
>>65019086
Pistols have fewer import restrictions than rifles in the US. Barrels under a certain length can be imported as pistols, over a certain length and the ATF won't approve them being imported as pistols. They won't approve them as rifles because they don't meet the sporting firearm requirements. That being said, these guns are fun as fuck and if you don't like them you're a massive faggot.
>>
>>65018729
historically HK roller guns were more reliable with short barrels and suppressors than ARs or FALs or other contemporary guns so the SAS and maybe some American units, IDR, specifically ordered really short barrel 5.56 and 7.62 nato guns because they wanted an MP5 sized gun but in 5.56 or 7.62 nato.
>>
File: Dirk dirka.png (1.52 MB, 1366x850)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB PNG
>>65021663
PTR makes HK's off of HK tooling.
Century imports these shorty guns from Turkey.

Is Century just better at marketing and flooding the market with one type of gun?
If the consumer had the option for 12.3" would they take it or is the AMerican consumer only a Murica f*ck yeah! type?

https://youtu.be/LasrD6SZkZk

t. Matt Damon
>>
>>65021693
Probably.
Also, much like with Soviet guns, you just make the AK but in a more compact sub gun/pistol size.

Easier than developing a new compact platform.
>>
>>65018729
>The physics dictates the 7.62x51 in a 8.3bbl is less effective than an 7.62x39.
The MC51 was made for the 14 intelligence company, as something they could hide under a coat and use to hose down passing vehicles and fuck up engine blocks; as their whole job boiled down to killing IRA/PIRA in drive-bys and being ambushed in return in drive-bys. Terminal performance beyond spitting distance was literally not a remote consideration; only that it could reliably penetrate car doors and engine grills at point blank.
>>
>>65021805
>PTR makes HK's off of HK tooling.
lmao, no. They got their original tooling to make G3's from portugal. I can't imagine those same machines are still making parts. If they made an HK93 clone I'm sure it would sell. They have the tooling to make short barreled 7.62x51 guns so they have made those. I would rather have an import.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.