what do you think this is worth? never bought a second hand optic before so no idea if this is a good idea or not. looks like its delaminating
>>65034881
>>65034881>looks like its delaminatingSo a defective, cheap ass optic is what you wanted?
Zero unless you have it in hand and can check reticle brightness to see if it's leaked. It's almost certainly leaked if they aren't showing ultra bright reticle pics in sunlight, or if the price is too good to be true.
>>65034881Anon, I have a personal binary rule: never buy second hand optics unless they are attached to second hand guns, and never let the price of a secondhand gun be dictated by the bull shit someone else tacked on to it.
>>65034881Eotechs suck, its delaminating lol. Dogshit batterylife, massive zero shifts due to tempature change, and what other optic delaminates? Unfortunately i know from experience. I bought a second hand nf atacr from eurooptic and its been great. Thats about the only place id trust to buy a second hand optic
>>65034912>>65034937>>65034945>>65034995Thanks for the replies lads. Haven't seen it in hand unfortunately so it would be a gamble. Definitely shit, but surely it'd be worth something?
>>65035024>Definitely shit, but surely it'd be worth something?It is nor worth my time to speculate.
>>65035024Most id pay for the pictured eotech is $50 and i wouldnt put it on anything more serious than a rimfire. Im trying to get rid of my eotech 512 which isnt delaminating for $200 and having a hard time. Unless your a night vision larper (i am and even the a t2 shits on a xps3) there is no reason to buy an eotech unless cloning.
>>65035739IMO 1X optics for rifles are solved and 100 bucks.
