[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Eotech-Vudu-X-banner.png (554 KB, 699x514)
554 KB
554 KB PNG
What does everyone think of them? Are they worth the price or would it be better to get an ACOG or lpvo?
>>
i hate these fucking transparent trash engagement threads. fuck you
>65040702
>an ACOG or lpvo?
>or lpvo
what the FUCK do you think that is in your picture. post timestamp and gun
>>
File: IMG_2040.jpg (2.18 MB, 4032x1744)
2.18 MB
2.18 MB JPG
>>65040709
Sorry, should have been “or a cheaper lvpo.” My first post was eaten and I retyped my post in a hurry. As you can see from my pic, I’ve been using my AR as a backup deer rifle/buddy rifle but now I want to make it a range toy. I don’t know much about optics, hence why I came here.
>>
>>65040702
mediocre chinkshit scope with an eotech logo markup
>>
>>65040702
Just get an ACOG and piggyback a red dog
>>
>>65040702
Get an ACOG and mount it ontop of a carry handle.
>>65040829
Don't listen to this retard.
>>
>>65040813
That’s what I kinda figured but I wanted to be sure. How about the Sig and Vortex lvpos? The Sig is considerably cheaper but I know they have a reputation for poor quality control nowadays, at least when it comes to guns. Does that apply to their optics?
>>
>>65040778
>OP wasn't entirely a faggot today
i am genuinely surprised op, thank you. Well in that case serious answer: the chinesium stuff has gotten shockingly good in the last 6 years, as good as very high end stuff from 10-15 years earlier. And LPVOs (and other optics) are really personal, some people find they fit well, other would be much happier with fixed mag + dot or irons, or alternatively a 1x (either prism or holo or dot) and flip mag. Or MPVO + 1x for that matter. LPVOs imo can be useful but in a narrower range of uses then is commonly said. Finally, cost in LPVOs makes no difference in fundamentals. More money gets you less chromatic aberration and slightly truer 1x and so on, but no fundamental change in experience, no 5x the eyebox or anything like that. And even the downsides matter way less at the range you use one at. Who cares about a little edge shift at a few hundred yards? If you're shooting 1000 you wouldn't use an LPVO in the first place.

So in general ideally you'd spend some time with one first, but if you just want to try an LPVO I'd suggest strongly you start with some solid value deal. Arken/Swampfox/Element Optics/etc, or something mid-range from a few years back but used and at sufficient discount. See how you like it and you can always upgrade if you truly want. But high end lpvos are genuinely a pretty bad value almost all the time. And even for a range toy there's so much other stuff to splurge on with more fun/bux, more exotic and unusual guns, thermals and nvgs and suppressors and so on.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.