Why was WWII the most aesthetic modern era war by far?
>>65045728Eh. Vietnam and Gulf 1 are arguably superior. Early GWOT was /k/ino too.And WWI.
>>65045736>Vietnam and Gulf 1/thread
>>65045728Far enough out of the WW1 "everyone wearing vestiges of the colonial/napoleonic era" aesthetic but not quite into the "convergent evolution means everyone is wearing pretty much the same stuff with different flags on their shoulders" aesthetic
>>65045728i like ww1 but imo eaely GWOT was kino with all of the various diffrent nato forces with sand camo patterns
>>65045728>Why was WWII the most aesthetic modern era war by far?The SS.
>>65045728Op, shut the fuck up.
>>65045728I prefer Vietnam aesthetics.
>>65045728They look like shit.
>>65045728wtf is that thompson doing there?
>>65045728It wasn't,.Vietnam was, by a landslide.>>65045736The moment they traded in ALICE for MOLLE is when it died.
>>65045728brit paras where the most aesthetic troops on the allies side, regular brit grunts the most ugliest.
>>65046320they got a shit ton of the older models before the us officially entered the war.
>>65045728I'm always partial to the Korean war. WWII Pacific theater on both sides is a close second, and so is Nam.
>>65046320thomspon wasn't invented until ww1 ended.
>>65045736/thread
>>65046241Yeah, but looking good doesnt mean you win wars. The Germans had uniforms designed by Hugo Boss, but look at what happened to them.
>>65046551They are ww2 soldiers.
>>65046320Being shitty, heavy and expensive SMG.
