How is infecting someone with Anthrax or spraying Agent Orange around a forest worse than using regular bombs and nukes?
>>65045876You can irreversible damage to the environment, birth defects to local populace, and you also infect the crews of the bombers using it. An example of this can be observed in Iraq with depleted uranium usage, as well as the Vietnam war.
>>65045876It's "indiscriminate". Biological in particular is impossible to control once whatever you've dropped starts to spread.
>>65045876Why do you thirdies keep making this thread?
>>65045902Because they don't have nukes and they know that everyone knows it.
>>65045876Because poisoning the countryside is cruel, and pointless, and defeats the very purpose of even fighting over it.You thirdies don't know this, but when actual civilized nations went there in 1915 to 1918 it ws absolutely, truly awful and we decided to not ever try that again.
>>65045902I would use them on /hg/ and /arg/ immediatelyand all the Pentagram Tel Aviv cubicle dwellers like (You)
>>65045876>How is infecting someone with Anthrax or spraying Agent Orange around a forest worse than using regular bombs and nukes?If you need to ask that question, then you're too retarded to understand the answer. Lurk more and post less.
>>65045885>example of this can be observed in Iraq with depleted uranium usage,Gulf War "syndrom" is no more legitimate than that Cuban Embassy thing. Bunch of God Damn malingers, I tell ya!
how many times are we going to have this thread?>can't be reliably controlled once released (which won't always be intentional)>potentially defeated by something as mundane as an unexpected turn in the weather>potentially long-lasting effects on the environment, necessitating major post-war cleanup work if you want people to actually live or produce food there>once the genie's out the bottle, both sides will have to fuck around with protective gear for the rest of the war>liable to do more harm to civilians unfortunate enough to exist in the area than actual combatants, on account of not having any such protective equipment themselvesmeanwhile regular explosives, bullets, or shrapnel will kill or incapacitate the enemy just as well, without anywhere near as much hassleend result is that there's just a general agreement that it's not worth bothering with
>>65045940>/hg/HOHOHO YOUR THREATS ARE AS EMPTY AS YOUR TESTICLES ARE SMALL
>>65045885>birth defects>An example of this can be observed in Iraq with depleted uranium usageNo. They're inbred and that's why they have birth defects.
>>65045940Noguns
>>65045876bioweapons aren't used because they suck. why would you want a weapon that maybe kills your enemies in like a week when a good ol' HE shell almost certainly kills them right away
>>65046179jejune
>>65045876It was the German use of chemical warfare that triggered the Canadians into starting the Geneva Checklist.>>65046176Your family tree looking like a basket is why you have bone spurs?
>>65045876Why use something that'll kill in weeks/months/years time when shrapnel from a bomb will do the same in seconds/minutes? Think numbnuts Think!
>>65045876Op is victim of birth defects.
For all the reasons mentioned and also that it's no secret that countries like China and USA have continued to engineer chemical and biological weapons anyway, and so, in a funny analogue to nuclear weapons, no one wants to be the first to break the deal and find out what everyone else has been cooking up in the meantime.
>>65045876If you're even asking this ridiculous question it shows how uneducated and unintelligent you are.
>>65045876Chemical weapons are poor man nukes.Big boys form the nuke club didn't want no nuke plebs habing answer to them.Imagine Iran dropping VX tipped ballistic missiles cluster warheads on Israel. Single missiles woul easily produce 10000 casualties and make half of the town non usable for months.So big boys with nuclear bombs made chemical and biological weapons. Illegal.
>>65045924>*drops nuke on you*
>>65047284I'd rather live in a city that was nuked then a city which was doused with industrial defoliants.
>>65045924>truly awful and we decided to not ever try that again.Tell that to the burgers in Vietnam.
>>65045876Obviously it's not. At least 99% of the opposition to biological and chemical weapons is just idiots virtue signalling, and politicians and media pretending to for propaganda purposes.>>65045888But a bomb or a nuke or napalm does discriminate? Lol.
>>65047279Actually, while VX is the most toxic one, but it's persistent, so more of a area denial weapon. Sarin vaporize much faster, so the immediate casualties would be higher
>>65045876Bioweapons come back to bite you in the ass. Look at what happened when Trump had the CIA release COVID-19 in the Wuhan wet market. 50,000 Chinese died compared to 1.2 million Americans. Chemical weapons are too easy and turn a dick measuring contest into a war of complete depopulation. By using a weapon of complete extermination you're asking to be exterminated. Very few conflicts in history have ended with the complete extermination of the losing population, and most of those were due to an insult. Use of chemical weapons is a grave insult.
>>65047293I said 'civilized nations', but yeah tehy also tried and found out that it was a bad idea.Bonus points for poisoning your own troops during handling and deployment, and the workers who produced the stuff.
>>65048348>Look at what happened when Trump had the CIA release COVID-19 in the Wuhan wet market. 50,000 Chinese died compared to 1.2 million Americans.
>>65048348>Very few conflicts in history have ended with the complete extermination of the losing populationas somebody pointed out already, you're retarded, but nobody has ever achieved this. note; CONFLICT. the closest were the bongs wiping out a ethnogroup in Tasmania through accidential smallpox, it wasn't planned or designed. It just happened. Which is why people campaign for muh reparations etc. In terms of a WAR the closest was the Paraguayan War where only a small % of the population was left. Very few people have ever wanted to wipe out the other side because you want to make them work as slaves so you don't have to.
>>65045989
>>65045876Because a provocative race to the bottom dooms mankind.
>>65046400>Your family tree looking like a basket is why you have bone spurs?my dude, that's just the tip of the iceberg with the whole inbred shit, it can get so much worse, look at Charles II of spain for exemple.>The autopsy records his "heart was the size of a peppercorn; his lungs corroded; his intestines rotten and gangrenous; he had a single testicle, black as coal, and his head was full of water."DU is the least of your worries when your entire lineage is nothing but cousins fucking each others, on top of that if it was real, you would have heard a shit load of stories about crew members having health issues just by using them during training.
