How feasible would it be to use a nuke on Iran's underground missile silos, and uranium enrichment sites? This idea has been proposed in the past for targeting the underground sites buried more than 1,000 ft deep.
>>65049108t.Holden Bloodfeast
>>65049108Dimitri Medvedev is that you ?
>>65049108>1,000 ft deepWould a nuke even do anything to that?And aren't there so many you'd need to use a whole bunch?I just dont see it happening, iran isnt enough of a direct threat anymore to warrant that.
>>65049108>the underground sites buried more than 1,000 ft deep_ _ R _ _ _ _ S?
>>65049340I'd like to buy a vowel - U
>potential gainwipe out the nuclear sites for good this time, probably? as long as they haven't moved nuclear material elsewhere?>potential lossinstant upheaval of the existing nuclear world orderevery country with an interest in its own security pursues nuclear weaponshigh chances of pissing off every ally the US has right nowmassively lowers the threshold for nuclear use for everyone else who has them
>>65049181Prince Bloodfeast to you, mortal
>>65049345>1 (You)Here
>36 Days into the 3 day Major Combat Operation in Iran>President Trump takes to social media to praise allah on Easter and launches a nuclear strike
>>65049108Just STOP. It is the foreign policy of the USoA to never EVER use a first strike.
>>65049225Submarine can dive to that depth and launch the missiles
