>nuclear shell range: 25 miles>nuclear bomb range: 250+ milesYeah
>>65049658Carrier based aircraft can deliver the same or bigger nukes a longer distance you retard, and conventional firepower too for that matter. Also, the left argument is retarded pop history-tier at best and a strawman at worst. Obsolescence is usually primarily determined by whether or not a different platform can accomplish the same mission better or if the mission has lost relevance, not because of increased vulnerability which isn't even true for late battleships.
>>65049658Battleships didn't really handle ionizing radiation from the nukes all too well (25:45)https://youtu.be/DT1D3fh40Nk
>>65049658A missile can do everything a shell can do
>>65049658After seeing Ukraine and now Iran, why do we even have infantry or use anything other than jets, ships and drones?
>>65049815Someone has to clean up the mess afterwards.
>>65049787Except be cool
>>65049658>NOOOOOO THE AMMO IS TOO EXPENSIVE >WE KNOW YOU DEVELOPED A CLASS OF SHIP TO CARRY A BIG GUN THAT SHOOTS FAR>BUT THE AMMO IS JUST TOO DAMN COOOOOOOSTLY
>>65049901>missiles aren't coolgenuinely puzzled how a person can end up saying things like this unironically
>>65049679FPBP
