[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What's wrong with non-lethal bioweapon?
Like blanket an area with harmless tranquilizer gas? It's not against the Geneva convention if it's non lethal, right?
>>
>>65050521
Why dont they use hallucinogenic gas bombs? Like clouds of dmt or something
>>
>>65050521
Escalation.
>use tear gas
>enemy: "WE CAN'T SEE OR BREATHE! UNKNOWN GAS USED!"
>enemy retaliates with a lethal gas
Lrn 2 escalation ladder. Don't start climbing if you can't climb back down.
>>
>>65050521
>harmless tranquilizer gas
not a thing
>>
>>65050521
>What's wrong with non-lethal bioweapon?
There aren't any. There are "less lethal" ones, but tranquilizing someone is actually serious business. And like >>65050539 says it'll prompt massive escalation right away, as well as everyone getting into NBC protection. Also:
>It's not against the Geneva convention if it's non lethal, right?
Wrong actually.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.