not talking about ground drones to evacuate wounded or make danger suply runs, but actual war robodogs with weapons
no
>>65071176it's already in trials and moving towards the mass adoption phases
>>65071176getting real close
>>65071439>X bluecheckmark engagement bait posting>there are no people with accents living in the US
>>65071176Not even viable in the game you posted my guy.Also, no, not in real life either and I won't even bother to elaborate.
>>65071176>possibleProbably>Not hilariously retardedNo.
>>65071456Nta and hadn't heard of it myself, but was curious so went to google news and did "atlanta robo dog" and lots and lots of stories in last few weeks, looks real:>https://www.newsweek.com/robot-police-dogs-powered-by-ai-take-over-atlantas-streets-11782889>https://www.wsbradio.com/news/local/robotic-security-dogs-expanding-apartment-complexes-across-metro-atlanta/PIMZLUH5EVBGNPXMODTGYH3HDA/>https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/robotic-dog-patrols-metro-atlanta-helping-stop-crime-before-it-happens/K4DAH4G7VJBNHCQIFHI6RXXGRY/I don't see anything in them about where the operator's are, but I do see it saying that they "cost less than half a person in the same role". To get half the cost, but still employ a human operator, taking into account capital amortization and operating costs and profit etc, I'm having trouble seeing it not being outsourced unless they are already at that point where a single operator can run herd on a bunch of bots.The lack of transparency though is indeed pretty reasonable to draw a negative inference from imo. If the operators were local police employees, or American at all, I'd expect them to trumpet that.
>>65071439Sweet, how much longer until we get ED-209 ventilating people because it can't tell they dropped their weapon 9.4 seconds ago?
>>65071176You could make a detachment of robodogs but they'd be little use outside of cannon fodder. AI target recognition is still finicky,
