[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Wreckage(1).webm (2.28 MB, 1280x720)
2.28 MB
2.28 MB WEBM
If anyone remembers the incident from March 2nd when Qatari F-15s shot down two Iranian Fencer-Ds, Al Jazeera finally released footage showing the wreckages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blzPXDAtbTc&t=1677s
27:57

I'm glad we got a follow up because this engagement always stuck out to me as the ballsiest action of the war. Think about being one of those four Sukhoi pilots; taking off in a 40+ year old airframe while your country is under bombardment, flying low, crossing the Persian Gulf knowing your already high chances of getting shot down only increase the closer you get to your destination. Nationality aside those guys were some of the bravest guys of this war.

Gonna post .webms of the wreckages and animations of the shootdown from that Al Jazeera documentary for people who don't want to bother with the Arabic.

Here's the original Qatari MoD announcement, too,
https://x.com/MOD_Qatar/status/2028495558319435876
And the CNN piece on it,
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/04/middleeast/qatar-downs-iran-bombers-us-base-intl
>>
File: Wreckage(2).webm (2.85 MB, 1280x720)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
>>
File: Wreckage(3).webm (3.06 MB, 1280x720)
3.06 MB
3.06 MB WEBM
>>
File: Wreckage(4).webm (2.8 MB, 1280x720)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB WEBM
>>
File: Wreckage(5).webm (2.85 MB, 1280x720)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
Nice scuba footage of recovery operations.
>>
File: Shootdown(1).webm (2.82 MB, 1280x720)
2.82 MB
2.82 MB WEBM
You can see the second Fencer-D appears to have taken evasive maneuvers after the first one was hit. Likely saw their buddies go and tried to beat the AAM.
>>
File: Shootdown(2).webm (2.83 MB, 1280x720)
2.83 MB
2.83 MB WEBM
Second and last animation. End of documentary .webms dump.
>>
>>65071565
Very cool stuff. I'm honestly surprised that they bothered with the recovery, but I guess the intel gathered from the two wreckage was worth it no matter what
>>
File: 1511598855635.gif (996 KB, 290x231)
996 KB
996 KB GIF
>>65071565
kino footage, thanks for posting
>>
Some relatively recent photos of Iranian Su-24 Fencer-Ds (2022-2023) for reference.

Possible that different airframes had different camo and marking styles, but if not it'd indicate they changed the camo and marking style before/for the current war. Registration number for 3-6850 used to be in black above the flag, while registration number for whatever airframe was shot down (3-68??) is in white below the flag here >>65071567 >>65071573
>>
>>
Interestingly this one's in Farsi, but it's the same airframe a year after the previous two photos; 3-6850 (۳-۶۸۵۰)

Sources,
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11523176
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10520283
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10948788
>>
>>65071634
>>65071639
>>65071648
I think I see what they did now; English numerals left-side rudder and right-side fuselage, Farsi numerals right-side rudder and left-side fuselage. Makes sense.
>>
>>65071565
Any word on what they were armed with? The Iranians are fanatical, but--to their credit--not wastefully suicidal. This attack just seems so hopeless I really struggle to wrap my head around it.
>>
File: Su-24MK munitions.png (1.43 MB, 1397x786)
1.43 MB
1.43 MB PNG
>>65071666
I don't speak Arabic and YouTube's auto translate has flaws, but at 32:32 the question is asked and the defense spokesman seems to specify they were carrying bombs rather than missiles.
>>
>>65071666
Also, the Iraqis, despite having similar survival instincts, made a similarly ballsy attack during the Gulf War,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Ras_Tanura
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pqAJPM9ql4

I think it comes down to crew initiative. Rubs some airmen the wrong way to just be destroyed on the ground without doing anything.
>>
File: 1757890283823180.png (212 KB, 456x427)
212 KB
212 KB PNG
>>65071565
So has the IRIAF entered eternal flight?
>>
>>65071708
Saw one post from a generally reliable OSINT account of an IRIAF C-130 still airborne yesterday,
https://x.com/EGYOSINT/status/2043130146735935924

Obviously the IRIAF is still largely destroyed and didn't pose much of a threat to begin with. I'm surprised they got aircraft off the ground for an attack at all, honestly.
>>
Pilot status? Drowned?
>>
>>65071732
No time to eject. They were trying to fly under the radar at 80ft above the sea.
>>
>>65071565
Thanks for the post OP.
Also
>Shot down by F15s
Eagle-sama..I kneel.
>>
>>65071565
>taking off in a 40+ year old airframe while your country is under bombardment, flying low, crossing the Persian Gulf knowing your already high chances of getting shot down only increase the closer you get to your destination.
this is an extremely high risk proposition even in motherfucking red dragon vs near peers in it's 'hey day', those were some die hard pilots
>>
>>65071624
If nothing else it'll tell you a bit about who they're getting parts from, the standards things are being kept to and give you a chance to see if there's any unexpected modifications or components from sources that really shouldn't have gotten there.
>>
>>65071701
That was at least well planned, by exploiting a gap in air control coverage. This was a YOLO charge straight across the gulf.
>>
>>65071790
Their command and control was rooted on day one, it's possible it was meant to be part of a larger plan that never materialised or was incorrectly triggered.
Or four Su-24 drivers who figured they and their planes were likely dead in a couple hours anyway and chose to go out in style, and if so they absolutely did.
>>
>>65071790
Well to be fair to the Iranians they were intercepted only 3 minutes from target, so getting across the Gulf went pretty well. It was once they got near the other side where things went wrong.
>>
good thread, i like the hd footage of the broken parts that was really nice
>>
>>65071565
>>65071605
Even ignoring the significant CAP and SAM threat doing 540kn and 80ft takes balls of steel in training.
>>
>>65071624
>>65071789
I imagine the main concern is are they domestic Iranian engines, their rockets are better than expected so it's not impossible.
>>
>>65071761
The K-36 seat is supposed to be 0-0
>>
>>65072092
At 80ft and 540 knots the plane would be into the sea before the warheads fireball disappeared.
>>
>>65071920
their rockets only have to do their job once though
>>
>>65071789
A long time ago now, but over a dozen Su-24's from lraq fled during the Gulf War to lran could have helped with spare parts
>>
>>65071854
>Well to be fair to the Iranians they were intercepted only 3 minutes from target, so getting across the Gulf went pretty well. It was once they got near the other side where things went wrong.

Supposedly 2 su-24s bombed an american base in kuwait killing or wounding 6 americans. I guess it was these guys and they were going for target #2.
>>
>>65072328
Just No
>>
>>65072328
I've seen no confirmation of that claim.

>>65072327
Iran got it's first Su-24s at around the same time of the Gulf War.
>>
>>65071854
It's more accurate to say they were 2-3 minutes from reaching Qatar territory since they were downed in the sea. Qatar isn't very big and it wouldn't have took much more time to reach it, but the air base is more towards the middle of the country.
>>
>>65071565
mullah retards fail hard and die
no one cares
>>
>>65072328
>>65072328
>Supposedly
you have a brain but,no it is made of brown.
>>
>>65072092
Russian/soviet ejection seats never were 0-0 despite the claims
>>
>>65072092
Russian seats are surprisingly good but you still need time to initiate and execute the sequence before your various atoms are no longer neighbours.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.