https://youtu.be/7_Tb0hFGLKQAnother ambitious little tech demo, albeit a littel late for the shot show hype train.Super interesting, but all they have to show for it is a 3d animation.Anyone think this thing has a future, or are we going to see it on Forgotten Weapons in five years?
>>65088230look at those bot comments jesus
I am still waiting on Monstrum to drop that scope of theirs that they showed off at Shot Show which they claim does everything the XM7's does, but they are going to sell it for like $300. I'd also like a blowjob from prime Angela White, too, but neither of those are really going to happen, just like that scope in your vid.
>>65088230Waveguide is just an embedded fiber optic. It's trivial tech. It also gets cold and shatters below 38f.
>>65088249Monstrum is airsoft trash. Fuck monstrum. Any claim they make is 100% going to be a lie.
>>65088249laser range finder BDC is such a meme when 556 is point and shoot to like 350mIf you're shooting further than that I don't trust you to hit if you need the laser BDC, because finding your hold is not the hard part of shooting
>1500 hours runtimeBetter be 300 bucks or less or else its going into the Eotech but no drip category.
>>65088230NV should be standard on all red dots/scopes by now. Why don't they have glasses that do that at this point? We have Google glasses and other HUD glasses but no digital NVG glasses? I want augmented vision dammit.>>65088884I have a $100 Triton LPVO and it's great. Scopes were invented in like the 1500s dude, not much needs to go into them.
>>65090911>it's greatIt's not, you just don't really know what to look for
>>65088249>I'd also like a blowjob from prime Angela White, too, but neither of those are really going to happen, just like that scope in your vid.I got to fuck Anny Aurora but I had to pay $500
>>65088230finally background music that doesn't make me want to fuck some nerd up
>>65088230nah i think this one is happeningive tried out prototype waveguide HMD visors ~2 years back and the tech is fairly mature or close to mature especially for simple stuff like a sight.all theyre doing is taking the 'traditional optics of like an eotech and shoving them inside a single optical element/piece of glass. the idea is very old its just that manufacturing was extremely expensive until recently
>>65088230Anybody else that it was a forklift thread a first?
ai garbage
>>65088230https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOpw4CVC744Now ain't that a funny little coincidence, here's FN releasing an almost identical sight. It even seems to use the same kind of flat-panel fiber optic layer to project the reticle. I wonder if they're related in some way, like a common OEM or a patent expiring opening up a new market.
>>65094152>>65088230>>65091411watch reviews of this tech it has more paralax than a Chinese $50 red dot.
