Korean tank is laughed worldwide for being cheap copy of Leclerc tank and have defect powerpack
reactions:“A hentai tank,” huh?What a wonderful compliment.I love the video of Korea's new tank failing to go over a bump during its unveilingI’ve seen a video of the Hitomaru tanks. No matter what position they’re in, they can always move while keeping their sights locked on the target, and they move as fast as a car. And they coordinate this movement across multiple tanks.The Type 10 is so stylish—it’s the coolest in the world, isn’t it?It’s easy to see why so many countries are wary of Japan's military strength. With its advanced technology and high quality, “Made in Japan” is something we can be proud ofJapan has cheat skills that Korea doesn't haveThe Type 10's greatest strength is its reload time of 4 seconds (as fast as 2.7 seconds). This means that even if you miss a shot, you can fire two more shots while the enemy is reloading. Additionally, with a reverse speed of 70 km/h, it excels at evasive maneuvers.Japan is a country that applies its ingenuity not just to building sturdy bridges and skyscrapers, but to designing them with seismic isolation systems. Korea, who lower standards just so projects can barely meet them—simply because performance doesn’t meet the original benchmarks—would never understand thisHey neighboring country, let’s start by trying to build a “waterwheel” on your ownKorea and Japan are not allies. Lets stop holding this misconceptionSouth Korea: “Is there nothing we can do to beat Japan...?”As you can see in the video, Korean tanks have power packs that are fatally flawed, and the K1 series tanks are just not up to par—they’ve been modified in a low-level way that causes so many issues they don’t perform properly.They haven’t been able to replace outdated models like the M48, so they’re still in active service. The only decent tanks in that country are the T-80Us supplied by Russia and the M48 series supplied by the U.Shttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3A6XgYffcw
>>65096729*ladyboy
Why the fuck are the Polacks ordering so many K2's from worst Korea?
I don't like Koreans. Sometimes they come off as being even more pathetic than the Chinese. Also, their language is vomit inducing.
both tanks would have their crews blamed if one blew up for whatever reason
>>65096656East Asian racism is funny, identical subspecies of slant eyed goblins arguing who is closer to the white man while to the rest of the world you look equally yellow and underdeveloped, hysterically screeching at each other in your guttural, unintelligible monkey languages.
>>65100147One funny thing I found out recently is there is no greater insult to a nip than to be called Asian. Like nips straight up think they're some obviously separate and clearly superior race to ever other brand of slant eye gook, so when they find out that outside of their tiny Island nation pretty much no one can actually tell the difference between gooks, chinks, and nips is a massive blow to their egos, "noooo! I'm clearly Japanese! Can't you see my eyes are slanted 0.004° less than a Korean!?"
>>65100226Right, I'm sure you totally didn't just make that one up
>>65097639I'm bumping this thread again because I can't wrap my head around this. Every other legitimate country that even bothered to test the K2 didn't want them but Ploand went all in and bought hundreds of them. Why?!
>>65100226Why does the middle one have a black man on her name tag?
>>65101279Because she used to be a black man before getting isekai'd in an alternate reality
>>65101291Incredible. Do you have a name for the artist?
>>65101296Wani (perfect han)
>>65100812Tech transfer. That's always the reason when you see a big purchase of garbage like K2 or Gripen.
>>65100812Tech transfers and local production
>>65101279
>>65100226Damn I love soft asian women
>>65096657> falling for a nip propaganda videolmao>>65096656If this isn't some yellow monkey's having a dick measuring contests, here are the actual differencesK2 - True Heavy MBT with alot of improvements> Longer Barrel Gun that can shoot long distances. Type 10 has a shorter barrel, but apparently they have specialized ammo that allows it to shoot farther distances... I will believe it when I see it> Actual APS Hard-Kill system, Type 10 doesn't have an actual system to shoot down missiles> Has Top Attack Smart Missiles> NATO Standardized, that is why Nato love these tanks> Heavier, but has way more armor compared to the Type 10>Type 10 - Light and Fast. Uses alot of new tech> Is fast due to it's low weight and home made transmission> A bunch of new tech for communication> Composite Armor means you can swap out armor easierK2 was specifically made with NATO in mind. It has alot more pure firepower. More then good enough for fighting North Koreans.Type 10 seems to be made specifically for Japan. Its light weight is probably something they needed for bridge and terrain due to it's terrain. It's transmission and ammo is only made in Japan, so the international market won't touch it.If these went head to head, The K2 would probably win easily. It has longer range and way better armor.
>>65101705The Type 10 is highly suitable for SEA due to our terrain and bridges. The Japs should sell or license the chasis and let the customer choose their own main gun.
>>65101751they are also lightweight because their barrel is shorter.Also the SEA nation would need to upgrade their tech for the tank's communication system. Doubt that is cheap.
>>65101705> Actual APS Hard-Kill systemK2 tanks don't actually have this
>>65101705Type 10's L44 gun is swappable for an L55, the standard configuration uses the L44 for mobility reasons (the very point of the existence of Type 10) and the same goes for the modular armor.Also if Japan wanted to play a heavy MBT game, they'd simply upgrade Type 90, which is pretty much your standard 1500hp, 120mm, 50+ton late cold war 'western' heavy MBT designed to outmatch T-72/80, can pursue the same extra armor upgrade path as Leo2, Abrams, etc.SK joined the game as late as the 2010s with K2 because they couldn't domestically design and produce such an MBT back then as seen in many SK weapon development including the KF-21 gen4+ effort.
>>65101983The K1 in 1988 was already fully the equal of Western fourth gen MBTs
>>65101983>Type 10's L44 gun is swappable for an L55Then why didn't it?>can pursue the same extra armor upgrade path as Leo2, Abrams, etc.Again, then why didn't it in the first place?>K2 because they couldn't domestically design and produce such an MBT back thenK1/K1A1 already existed in the 90s which is a variation of Abrams.
>>65096656>Japanese Type 10 tank is more superior to Korean K2>*blows up*Nothing personal...
>>65097639>Why the fuck are the Polacks ordering so many K2's from worst Korea?It's a relatively new design that's still in production with digital technology fusion and autoloader, hence making it future proof. Yes, the Korean military is already moving on to an uncrewed, remotely controlled tank.>>65100812>Every other legitimate country that even bothered to test the K2 didn't want them but Poland went all in and bought hundreds of them.Actually, the Norwegian army who tested it found it on par, if not better than Leo 2A7. It was only to be beat by a marginal gap formed by economic, political considerations. But, nonetheless, Peru, Morocco, Egypt, Iraq, and a couple other nations are still on the table because there's simply not enough tanks being manufactured in the west.
>>65101279It's a South Korean meme. The picture is actually supposed to be the picture of herself.
>>65101931The updated K2 does
>>65101931>K2 tanks don't actually have thisThey do now.
>>65100812> Every other legitimate country that even bothered to test the K2 didn't want them but Ploand went all in and bought hundreds of them. Why?!Did you actually read the reports? The K2 was comparable/slightly better than the Leo with a cheaper price. Only reason the Norwegians went with the leo was because their neighbors had leos, thus sourcing parts much easier.
>>65101983technically the type 10 is a mbt, just one specialized for japan's terrain. Firepower/armor wise it is lacking and not something that would be effective in NATO. > SK joined the game as late as the 2010s with K2 because they couldn't domestically design and produce such an MBTthe... K1? wtf are you talking about. They joined the plane game late but they always prioritized ground weapon development due to their neighbors north.
>>65102133Does the K2 has better armor than Leo2?
>Buying tanks in 2026 Holy waste of money
>>65102035It wasn't, 1200hp and 105mm in the late cold war can't really be called standard or topnotch, and the later 120mm variants suffered lots of issues stemming from the gun exceeding platform capacity, which is one of the reasons why SK needed to develop K2 to begin with.Not to mention it's developed from an American prototype design, powered by a German powerpack, not quite domestic compared to Type 90, Leo2, Abrams, etc.>>65102121>Then why didn't it?>Again, then why didn't it in the first place?For better mobility and adaptability to their terrain and logistic constraints as I said. >>65102167>they always prioritized ground weapon development due to their neighbors north.Even so (or not surprisingly if you ask me as SK was still a thirdworld developing country in the 70-80s) they couldn't develop a gen3 or 3+ MBT on their own, demonstrated by the fact that K1 is based on American design, and the K2 (developed with input from a Japanese Type 90 designer btw) has long suffered domestically made power pack reliability issues as well.>However, consensus of the defense sector (the politicians, the military, and developers) viewed the K1 tanks as a "humiliation", because the tank itself was a proof that South Korea lacked in tank developing technology.>South Korean developers invited experts from around the world, including Sven Berge (Stridsvagn 103), Philip Lett (M1 Abrams), Israel Tal (Merkava), Hayashi Iwao (Type 90), and Richard Ogorkiewicz (European tanks) for a 40-hour seminar to help guide the concepts of the new tank development.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K2_Black_Panther#History
>>65102156>Did you actually read the reports? Ah yes, the "reports"
The Karate MEthod:A secondary charge CHOPS the ERA's blast BACK into the hole it came from so SPLATTER shrapnel hot good time popcorn enjoy. SOME popcorn go UP! And it comed down on your idiot korean brains you don't have. Idiot.THEN the other blast parts BOUNCE off the ground and KONICHIWA. In your pig low jaw they stab.All of your blast goes right back into your pickled faggot tank. Type 10 has NEVER had this PROBLEM.
What the fuck am I reading?
>>65102297Yes, the reports have are public so the loser can contest the contract if they find somethings off and the paying public can know why they must use this much money on it.
>>65102363Reports? NoFinal page of the reccomendation? Yes, but heavily redacted
>>65102343A thinly veiled /int/ thread.
>>65102295>the later 120mm variants suffered lots of issues stemming from the gun exceeding platform capacityK1A1 is a completely different tank from K1. It's not an upgrade but rather a complete redesign from scratch. I mean they're literally different to the point where their bolts are not compatible. Also, the development of K2 was already underway before K1A1 was developed.
>>65102295> However, consensus of the defense sector (the politicians, the military, and developers) viewed the K1 tanks as a "humiliation", because the tank itself was a proof that South Korea lacked in tank developing technology. It was a matter of national pride to have the ability to design and build a leading main battle tank.That source was literally the koreans being critical of themselves and their argument for wanting the K2 tank program. Even at the time, the updated K1 was comparable to the M1 Abrams.> South Korean developers invited experts from around the world, including Sven Berge (Stridsvagn 103), Philip Lett (M1 Abrams), Israel Tal (Merkava), Hayashi Iwao (Type 90), and Richard Ogorkiewicz (European tanks) for a 40-hour seminar to help guide the concepts of the new tank development. Per prior agreement, all the presentations were recorded, and used for guiding system development of the new tank. Then seven researchers of the Agency for Defense Development (ADD), who were responsible for designing the tank, were sent to the United Kingdom for a year of tank development education.I have no idea what this was supposed to criticize, but it seems like the gooks just went all in for tank development and invited every modern tank designer including the Japanese Type 90 designer. Then sent a bunch of people overseas to study modern tank design.> K2 (developed with input from a Japanese Type 90 designer btw) has long suffered domestically made power pack reliability issues as wellYou are literally describing initial woes that have been fixed in the latest iteration. I mean the Type 10 literally blew up as of recent. They probably won't later on... hopefully
>>65102680>intI've never been there. It has these types of posts >>65102320 ? Because I find that shit hilarious.
>>65097639>>65100812Poland wishes to have fleet of modern tanks, minimum 1k units strong, so they have purchased them from a country that could fulfill such an order. If not Korea, then next choice would be USA. I can't wrap my head around why Huns can't get this simple idea. It's not Poland's fault that Krauts can't produce enough Leos.
>>65096656Doesn't matter, drone baits
>>65103515>It's not Poland's fault that Krauts can't produce enough Leos.While production capacity is part of it, theres a bit more to the story of poland-german tank relations than just that
>>65102680>thinlytypical low moral gaijin
How will the nips recover from this?
>>65103617You can pretend that there are more reasons for it, like bad relations, bad deals or whatever, but in the end it comes to production rate, otherwise pro-EU parties would bend over backwards to cancel some deals and buy bunch of Leopards, but they literally can't buy something that doesn't exist. 1000 Leos are as real as 1000 Pidorian Armatas. I like tanks, I like Leos, but Krauts worked very hard for the last 3 decades to make sure Europe doesn't have have tanks usable for war.
>>65102320I read this like 5 times and have no idea what this chin chong is saying.
