[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2399.jpg (2.66 MB, 4032x3024)
2.66 MB JPG
Got this knife from a pawnshop today.

They thought it was an old slaughter house knife due to the solid aluminum handle.

It’s stamped with a 4 digit number on the blade that seems like a rack number or something to that effect. Closest I can find image searching is a wwii Australian paratrooper machete, but this is obviously some kind of Bowie knife or fighting knife in my opinion. It appears to be aluminum but the handle has some real weight to it, some maybe some kind of aluminum alloy.

No other markings so I suppose it could be a repurposed blade or just entirely custom. Roughly 11-12”
>>
>>65104241
It's just a cheap shit knife.
>>
>>65104241
I could be something but it really looks like some retrofitted/repurposed shit that some random modified.
>>
>>65104241
The blade is insanely wide for its length.
How thick is it? Could it have been a meat cleaver or machete someone had reprofiled?
I don't see any combat or fighting knife having a blade that thick, you're looking for something that is going to make it through gaps in ribcages, this thing looks like it would have a high chance of catching bone and not penetrating.
>>
>>65104241
its just an old shitty knife
probably was from a slaughter house, but eventually got chipped & dulled, then was taken and re-profiled into how it is now
>>
>>65104241
Machete turned into a bowie
Very cool but ultimately worthless
>>
Looks like someone's arts and crafts project.
>>
>>65104241
>They thought it was an old slaughter house knife due to the solid aluminum handle.
It doesn't look like any sort of usual butcher's or slaughterhouse knife, at least not in its current form. It's possible that it was something like that and was later modified.

>>65104332
>Could it have been a meat cleaver or machete someone had reprofiled?
That's very possible. I think it has been modified from its original form. If it was an old 'working knife' then I'd expect an bunch of dings and dents in the butt end of the handle, yet it looks squared off with relatively clean edges. I can't imagine a knife that was used in an actual slaughterhouse not showing signs of being banged around, dropped, etc....unless that damage was sanded off while someone was modifying it. Now if it were originally a machete that would make more sense, as that wouldn't be used around hard objects where the handle would get dinged up.
I don't think it's any sort of improvised trench knife. I've seen loads of those and they are usually more of a dagger or stiletto type of design, not a really wide design like that.
>>
>>65105662
I forgot to mention it doesn't look like any standard pattern WWI or WWII knife either. I think >>65105617 nailed it. It's probably some old machete that got reworked into a bowie.
>>
>>65104241
looks like a someone's drunk sunday project
>>
>>65104241
butcher's quartering knife, rare but also not desirable. It's just a crude industry POS tool that got outdated in like a year.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.