If Argentina wanted to take the Falklands again, would they be able to hold onto it this time?
>>65104764No, just like every other time you make these threads.
What's valuable on the Falklands?
>>65104767The sheep. You know why
>>65104768What about the penguins?
>>65104766England no longer has a navy.
No they can't, and likely won't be able to for at least a generation due to their dire financial issues which have ruined their military until recently. Give it another 25+ years for their military to be rebuilt (both in equipment and in trained personnel) and then having a leader who wants to risk losing again etc, and it means its very unlikely to happen, but no impossible.As for "why" - the Falklands has had lots of oil recently discovered there.
The Argie navy is somehow more pathetic than the Bong navy these days, they have>2 subs (inop, rusting)>3 frigates, which they call destroyers (from 1983)>6 corvettes (1 inop, youngest one is 22 years old at this point)>5 patrol vessels in the 1,000 GRT range>9 coastal patrol vessels in the <100 GRT rangeI don't know what the Bongs are keeping over at Port Stanley these days but I'm guessing it's not a dozen Royal Marines anymore
>>65104770Yes we do, its called the US Navy
>>65104764No. The British military might be in a freefall of poor recruitment and readiness, but the Argentine military is still in the 90s and lack the funds to modernize. Frankly, they're too tied up defending their waters from chink fishing fleets (relatable, desu) to be grabbing more territory.
>>65104769What are you, a sicko?
>>65104770The Argies aren't exactly in a stronger position than they were the 80s, comparatively.
>The firebrand Argentinian leader said: "Sovereignty is not negotiable, but it must be done judiciously, it must be done with intelligence."Nothing's gonna happen, he's not dumb or desperate enough.
>>65104838this, it's just the orange golem losing his marbles because he's upset that euros won't kiss Bibi's boots like he does
>>65104840Bongs should issue compulsary purchase orders for his golf courses in Scotland if he actually follows through with supporting Argentina's claims.For extra bonus funni: build wind farms on themhe'll sperg out like Chris Chan during the Blarms era
>>65104775Trump will just call Milei and Milei will be like yes master.
>>65104845Why wind farms of all things?
>>65104866They cause him immense seethe for some reason. He should have been called Donald Quixote.
>>65104766Fpbp>>65104764No>>65104770You're retarded
>>65104764So, a scenario:>Argentina invades with their fishing boats>UK fires bunch of nukes into Buenos Aires from submarinesSo what happens afterwards?
Argentina is too busy cucking for Israel
>>65104764If they can there maybe?>>65104934Chile expands its hallways.
>>65104764Despite the utter humiliation and decay the brits are suffering, the argentinians are in an even worse situation. And the first war was a similar (in spirit) situation for the brits. they had been controlled by slow burn communists for decades with steep decline. the question is, will the current government attempt to save its hide by defending its territory? it may be the win herr starmer needs to maintain his grip on power or at least redeem his reputation in the eyes of the jingoist on his way out.
>>65104838>Shrine of Thatcher on nightstand Made me kek.
desu, the Argentinians can't even try without a serious(ly expensive) military rebuild, and given general government retardation and how hard the treasury is trying to Old Yeller the RN at any given time it's a coin toss if the British would return even if they somehow did. Nobody really gives a shit anymore either way.
The Falklands are more use to Argentina politically as an external distraction for all of their domestic socioeconomic problems.Say what you will about them, but in the vast majority of cases, they've been smart enough to realize that having a permanent "It's not the fault of us the government that we're a third world country, it's our lack of ownership of these islands that's at fault so don't blame us for your situation!" is far better for them than gaining them and not having them be the miracle solution they've claimed them to be for 50+ years
>>65104764Isnt their country even more bankrupt this time? Depends if USA is willing to sponsor them against UK (they wont).
>>65104767Falkland territorial waters contain oil and gas reserves. More importantly for the UK, the islands serve as a strategic, long-range military port near the southern tip of South America. Its a trade route chokepoint that becomes a critical global trade route if the Panama Canal is compromised.
>>65104764Falk lands? Maldita inglaterra perra, las MALVINAS fueron, son, y siempre seran argentinas pinche puto pendejo
>>65105208Weird how the UK was in the middle of its worst (thatcher induced) economic crisis since the great depression when galtieri came to thatcher's rescue I mean viciously attacked the valiant defenders of albion
>>65105239Ssh~
>>65104866>>65104873he's been mad at windmills every since the scots build a wind farm next to his golf course and "ruined" the view. Just like he's been obsessed about tariffs after a jap outbid him at an auction back in the 80's.
>>65105249there had been some well probes about the Brits being willing to sell the islands to the argies. the Brits didn't shoot those down straight away because the island cost a lot to maintainreducing the British military presence to next to nothingthe lax British response to some argies raising their flag on some other abandoned islandall gave the junta the feeling that the British wouldn't fight to get the islands backdue to this assumption they failed to adequately plan to sustain their forces on the islands and garrisoned them mostly with second rate troops
>>65105239las malvinas onions blanco
Falklands Island is the most heavily defended island in the world (per square km). So, yes, but with horrendous losses. But Starmer is charge and he's a draconian freedom hating cuck so would probably kneel to Argentina and kiss their boots.
>>65105274yo prefiero onions rojos porque tienen mas sabor pero habras que comer lo que te gusta
>>65105263He's such a petty nutbar.
>>65104766>nothe moment the type 45s cross the tropics they would break down just like they did in cyprus again after they were supposedly fixed for the gearbox heat failure so yes
>>65104770all of Argentina's navy is in this photo1 amphibious landing ship, 10ktons, soon 50 years old3 destroyers, all over 40 years old5 frigates, all under 2ktons, ranging from 20 to 40 years oldno submarines
>>65105291>just like they did in cypruswhich had nothing to do with that particular problem, and everything to do with having been sent out while in the midst of a maintenance weekso no, faggot
>>65105225>Depends if USA is willing to sponsor them against UK (they wont).Why not?
>>65105277He'd be thrown out of a window if he even talked about giving them up. The party that gives up the Falklands is never getting elected ever again.Real question is what is the rest of Europe going to do? French have already subtly said they'd side with the British and even send a warship because A) It pisses off orange man and B) It would cuck the British for not being able to defend their own holdings.
>>65105316>He'd be thrown out of a window if he even talked about giving them upconsidering that they didn't do that when he gave away Diego Garcia and some rights around Gibraltar, I'll take that with a spoon of salt
>>65105316>Real question is what is the rest of Europe going to do?The EU has been calling them Las Malvinas for a few years now.
>>65104764Milei probably cut a deal with Trump that US oil companies get exclusive rights to drill around the islands while Argentina finally get the lands
>>65104764This discussion is redundant because Argentina wouldn't be able to land a force.>>65105316Europe would back the UK, not that they'd be required, as what little Argentina could deploy, would not amount to a threat of the UK task force.>>65105323You do understand the DG deal was a Biden Admin idea, once that Trump initially supported?
>>65105333>the DG deal was a Biden Admin idea, once that Trump initially supported?and why would I give a toss about that?
>>65105339Because it's in contradiction to what you're saying.
>>65105343>because the Diego Garcia deal was a Biden Admin idea which Trump initially supported, that is why the Brits didn't hang Two-Tier Keir when he gave away D.G.>which is why if Two-Tier gives away the Falklands, regardless of US opinion, the Brits will certainly throw Two-Tier out the window because this time it's differentis it though?
>>65105352Because it wasn't his policy, and had already been negotiated with the US.
>>65105360the>oh I didn't really want to, it was the previous government's idea, so I just HAVE to go through with it, I'm actually against it REALLYexcuse oddly enough never applies to any changes the new government makes to prior policy
>>65104934Do the brits even own theie nukes anymore. I know they are US build and US serviced so maybe they won't even be able to bong out when milei looses his last marbel
>>65105352the main difference is that no one who isn't a military or small islands nut even knew Diego Garcia existedwhile the Falklands are a part of the bong national identityif I ask you for a toothpick you won't mind, if I ask you for your car you would
>>65105378I dunno, you don't build or service your own car, do you think you own it?>inb4 I don't, it's still on layaway
>>65105368Who are you actually quote? Because nobody ITT in this thread has said that, you're literally just making shit upDG deal has cross party support. Squaring it solely on Starmer, for the sake of making an argument that he'd surrender Falklands by default, is retarded, by the very fact it would require killing British citizens.>>65105378The warheads are British built. The delivery vehicle is leased.
>>65105388>The warheads are British builtare they though?I'm beginning to think they probably just bolt on a British lock on an American warhead
>>65105394Yes. It's a matter of Congressional record. Unless you believe the DoD is giving warheads free of charge and not telling Congress.
>>65105400>Unless you believe the DoD is giving warheads free of charge and not telling Congressshitposting aside I really don't know, who's to say they haven't bluffed Congress or made it true by a technicality (shipping knock-down kits to be assembled by a bong mechanic with an IKEA toolkit) and we'll never know because these are operational nuclear matters with immediate security ramifications
>>65105324>Source: The worms in my brain
>>65104773>I'm guessing it's not a dozen Royal Marines anymoreOut of curiosity, looking it up there's an infantry company, some SAMs (don't know how many), and four RAF Typhoons. Then a few hundred more supporting personnel for that. There's also a civilian reserve militia of a few dozen called the Falkland Islands Defense Force that looks pretty comfy:https://youtu.be/1S0IpP2wkP8
>>65105407https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/20/islas-malvinas-brexit-cited-as-eu-endorses-falklands-argentine-name
>>65105412Brexit means brexit
>>65105388>you're literally just making shit upwell then I'm a little confused, help me clear this up:>ackshually Starmer didn't want to give D.G. away, but he was forced to abide by the contract that was signed by the previous PMor>Starmer willingly gave D.G. away not just because just about every decision he's ever made has been to dismantle the UK, but also because it was going to be his name on the dotted linewhich is it?>DG deal has cross party supporttrue, they're all treasonous snakes, not just that one cunt
>>65105412>The heckin' GuardianerinoLol. Lmao even
>>65105408Wow the most ESL post of the year!
>>65105421Feel free to google "las malvinas eu" yourself and pick your source if you still believe it's just brain worms. The UK is on its own and Argentina looks to be backed by the US now.
>>65104764I don't even think they'd be able to take it.Britain has 4 Typhoons with BVR missiles. A bunch of F-4s and F-16s flying across the ocean wouldn't stand a chance.
>>65105425>My three year old commie paper sauce is valid! Valid! WAHHHHHH!
>>65105422>t. Hauptmann Dunning-Krueger>>65105408>an infantry companycurrently a company of Para reservists
>>65105428>F-4sSkyhawks, not Phantoms
How many F-16s does Argentina need to take the islands?
>by themselves Probably not>with support in supply aid and weapon system from our northamerican ally in USAYes we would massively rape and humiliate the Anglo Saxons. America please give us B-52 to turn every Anglo Saxon on our land into mash poatato. If America help to kill a bunch of kelper land theifs then I will do anything Trump ask of me.
>>65105408>There's also a civilian reserve militiagenial, osea no hay k no llorarán cuando bombardeamos Porto ArgentinoFantastic, no crying allowed when the military target of Porto Argentino is bombed into dust
>>65105412>Peter Stano, a spokesperson for the European External Action Service – the EU’s diplomatic service – said: “The EU member states have not changed their views/positions concerning the Falklands/Malvinas Islands. The EU is not in a situation to express any position on the Falklands/Malvinas, as there has not been any council [of member states] discussion or decision on this matter.”do you even read your own fucking article?>“The UK is not part of the EU. They are upset by the use of the word Malvinas. If they were in the EU perhaps they would have pushed back against it.”this was just that one smarmy cunt trying to score a cheap shot, which the Bremainist Guardian endorsed, and you fell for it>The EU officialan official night janitor at the Hague would also be called "an EU official" and the Guardian would allow it on a technicality>added that “the Argentines have spun it in a certain way”and even then the asshole admitted that it's all a load of chest-thumping bollocksthat's how the Guardian plays the game. because the insult suits their own political stance, they report it as if it was true, cover their asses with technicalities, and then let you chew on itwhich you did, hook line and fucking sinker
>>65105471Trump want to bomb your stupid communist bitch president for any reason, he is hungry for the reason please do something we will crush you Smelly breath bastard
>>6510544216 to get past the Typhoons and then another 12 to get past the Sky Sabre. After that you're home free.
>>65105472>saars do not redeem the Malvinas YOU BLOODY BENCHOD FUCK YOU BLOODY
Reminder that Peru, one of the only nations to assist Argentina in the initial operation to retake the islands, has also bought a bunch of F-16 along with Argentina recently.
With American diplomatic and maybe naval support (oil blockade on Suez to hurt British reserves for example), I think Argentina could take the islands and then set up air defenses to defend them
>>65104770Neither does Argentina
>>65105479Argentina sold weapons to Ecuador while we were fighting against them, so fuck them.
>>65105480America isn't going to support a Falklands invasion. Trump is just giving Starmer one last noogie before Sir Keir is forced to resign.
>>65104934The Americans who approved the launch from the UK redirect the coordinates to hit #10 in London, and then send another nuke at Asunción Island and then the rest of the arsenal into the Atlantic Ocean
Britain could probably still hold onto it. For how bad the bongs are at building infantry fighting vehicles and tanks, the typhoons are pretty good and their navy should be good enough to sustain without US help this time
>>65105394>>65105404There is a huge warheads fabrication facility outside of Reading at AWE Aldermaston, they have one of of the few all-armed police forces in the UK, and employ a huge number of people in the local area. They absolutely build their own warheads.The facility looks like a bit like the bloodsucker nest from the Stalker Misery mod from a distance, always creeped out>t. Used to live nearby
>>65105510the french manage to build and maintain their own warheads and delivery platforms.why wouldn't the angloids be able to at least one of those?
>>65105520Don’t have the technical know how
>>65105510The UK has full independent launch authority over their tridents. You're making shit up.
>>65105510>>65105529What are they teaching you over in Burgerland? How are the subs meant to launch if communications systems between Washington and London get knocked out in a first strike then?Kind of sounds like you don't know shit about fuck.
>>65105529How exactly? Sink the fucking Vanguards before they launch? The U.S. has no launch authority.
>ITT: vassal state with the illusion of self determination think the shadows on the cave wall are reality All we have to do is press the off switch. You are crazy if you think the most powerful nation in the history of humanity would give one of its island bases the independent capability to launch a nuclear device
This is just another thirdie (/pol/tard) thread.
>>65105522the french have the technical know how to do all three but the bongs scrape together enough to do just one?yea, you're not fooling anyone with that
>>65104773>>65104845>>65105378>>65105383>>65105404>>65105500Newfag here, why do we call the british "bongs"?
>>65105572Sound Big Ben make innit bruv
>>65105572we'll only tell you when it's 12'o bong
>>65105572old /int/ meme
>>65104764They would likely litigate their claim, hence the navy or lack of one isn't that relevant.
>>65104775oof this aged well
>>65105575>>65105576>>65105583Wholesome spoonfeeding
>>65105315Because contrary to the belief of the terminally online and the best wishes and efforts of Chinese & Russian active measures shills, the UK actually *is* the US's top ally and basically the only one that gives them a real return of capability across the board on that partnership. It's not just the global bases, but extensive intelligence sharing and technological cooperation. Remember how pissed Trump got at the UK preventing US use of Fairford and Diego Garcia at the start of the Iran war? About the lack of UK military naval support? (They have some of the best minehunting capability) The UK MIC is very integrated with that of the US as well. If those connections get degraded it's actually a real blow to US (and by extension the entire western world's) capability. The UK politicos were likely livid that they weren't even informed that the US & Israel were going in on Iran and so have been making a point of only doing the bare minimum of cooperation to stop Trump using it as an excuse to disband NATO. It fucking sucks to say it but the relationship is probably at its lowest point in decade, Putin is laughing.
>>65105378It's only the delivery vehicle that is US built. Warheads and integration are still performed by the UK and the capability to land kilotons on target is still totally sovereign. If the US decided to stop maintaining the missiles the UK would have a good while to replace them with an indigenous system before the last of the US built stock needed maintainenace/replacement.
>>65105510>>65105529Incorrect. There is no sort of kill switch to prevent the UK from launching them once they are on British subs. The missile stocks are co-mingled to prevent tampering prior to loading as well so they are identical to US missiles. The US does not have kill switches on their own missiles and so neither do the UK missiles.
real question is whether 2026 bongland would actually be willing to go to war for something like that
>>65104771Argies will never be able to do anything to the Falklands because they have turned into a brown corruptocracy due to changing demographics. A hundred years ago they were one of the wealthiest countries in the world.
>>65105798The British have possession of literally every gold oz the government owned in exchange for British iou low interest "loans." It was one of the first things milei did.People talking about Argentina attacking a British holding don't even know what they're fantasizing about can't even be considered fantasy anymore. It's impossible. Argentina got sold to the British specifically to make it a non issue for you know who.
>>65105682Bong hands typed this post. The UK is a series of bases for the US and nothing more.
>>65105291Why would we need Type 45?Two Astutes could sink your whole navy overnight and be back in time for crumpets on BBC 1 in the morning. >>65105378Britain has always had ability to create warheads. Only the delivery system is US.>>65105467No crying when the military target of Buenos Aires gets the Starship Trooper treatment.>>65105529And as we well know, any 5.56 ammunition bought from the USA comes with a magical quantum kill switch which can disable it instantly from anywhere on the planet!>>65105823Which makes it all the more unlikely the USA would take direct military action against us because somehow I doubt they want to lose their key logistics hubs to access the Middle East/Europe, particularly when they're in the middle of a war with said Middle East.
>>65105893You can’t even stop ruZZian warships and sub from sailing right down the middle of the English Channel, the argies with US naval support would kill every single defender on the island within hours. They would all die and would resort to hiding among civilian population centers.
Imagine being on a Mexican American bilingual elite spec ops PMC team and you are hired by the Argentinian government to do a night time assault on Porto Argentino to kill all the defenders with night vision and thermals and FPV drones
>be me, Argie>grandfather celebrates June 14 (the day that the last troops in Port Stanley surrendered) every year because he violently opposed the junta
All I’m saying is that as an American if I was drafted into a war against the British I wouldn’t be taking any prisoners.
>>65105956Let me guess, you're just pretending to be retarded?
>>65105997He's not wrong about the Russian Shadow Fleet sailing around UK waters unmolested.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/20/britain-cannot-afford-to-seize-russian-ships/
>>65104770England has no guns on boats
>>65106012i mean it was all fun and games untill russia said that they gonna start escorting their shipsafter that they somehow found excuses
>>65105823GLOBAL SERIES OF BASES HAVE ISLANDS YOU CAN SEE FROM YOU LAND WITH A TELESCOPE,,,,ARGENTINA A FUCK.
>>65106012>>65106056He is very wrong about them not being allowed to do it though, the channel has right of transit under UNCLOS and the last time I checked we weren't at war with the vatnigs, so no reason to prevent passage. He said nothing about siezing shadow fleet tankers, which I agree we should just start grabbing when they try and sail through the channel, what are those 'escorts' going to do? The last thing the Russians actually want is a shooting war with NATO, which with their stupid "i'm not touching you" game would mean they'd have to just sit and watch while the tanker got siezed as it's not legally a russian ship after all, why would they care about it getting siezed?The navy absolutely could have siezed that ship and subsequently turned anything flying a st andrews cross into colanders if they tried anything to stop it, the only thing stopping them was the government making my balls blue.
>>65105956Bait used to be believable.
>>65105962make sure to clean up after you're done jerking off
>>65105969Incredibly based uncWhat kind of circus slaps on "LAS ISLAS MALVINAS SON ARGENTINAS" on>Buses>Signs>renaming entire towns (often some of the poorest ones)>street names>buildings>the kitchen sinkAt some point you can't keep milking the same thing forever
>>65105263This level of grudge-holding and pettiness is unsettling.Also, to answer OP, no. Argentines are too busy eating donkey meat
>>65105969You should drink with him while you have the chance. t. no grandparents left
>>65104764Bongs won't get there in time to stop an occupation and possession is 9/10s of the laws.
>>65106665Nuke dropped in Buenos Aires would change that assumption pretty quickly
>>65105235There is no worth oil. UK immediately went looking for it after 1983, exploration contracts flying everywhere, big spend. Oil booty was probably factored into the entire war stratagem on both sides.20 years later silence, no production, rigs (all rigs now) pulled out. No oil, some subsea coal and gas, nothing immediately exploitable.
>>65104764Is Argentina whiter than Britain today?
>>65107211No new rigs in the North Sea either, because the UK government is going all Green.
>>65106665>they're, uh, closer to us so gimmeGibraltar-coded argument kek
>>65105324Le isole Falklands sono e saranno sempre Britanniche. Qui in Europa nessuno le considera argentine.
>>65106665Cause I don't speak diego talk I choose to believe this means that the Falklands are going to invade Argentina and turn Argentina into the West Falklands.
>>65106665There is or was a huge 50x50 km lost island in the Drake Passage, discovered by Drake himself, but just gone afterwards. The largest known "disappeared island", with the possible exception of the mirage canarias island or the unnamed rough island north of the Falklands. These two, while being large, were never measured, nor walked upon, unlike Drakes island.
>>65107241>No new rigs in the North Sea either, because the UK government is going all Green.Its political, f.ex it is forbidden by law to prospect for oil, gas or coal in Sweden.
>>65105267Argentina was forced to retain the larger part of their top tier troops due to pressure from Chile deploying troops to their borders. Chile also fed UK with intel, did disruptions of communications and stuff like that. Recently a granny from Uruguay revealed that she spied for the Brits, add whatever intel US was sharing and basically the brits had a full CAT Scan of the situation.
There's a chance here for some laffos if the UK govt plays its cards right>Offer up the US ownership of Pitcairn island, for free, forever>Let Trump celebrate all over social media about it>Don't actually tell him what's on Pitcairn
>>65107779"il sangue non è acqua"
>>65105378its not the warhead that is built and maintained in the US but the carrier your retarded cunt
>>65107832>Pedo islandDon't know why the Brits don't disband their ownership of the place. It's going to die out within the next decade anyway.
>>65108045Keeping the islands means the fishing waters around them are protected, its never been properly explored for mineral reserves so it might have some riches to it, and if the UK ever needs or wants to as a satellite relay point.
>>65108048Once the inhabitants die off, and they 100% will based on current projections, it's going to be fished by the Chinese. The UK would have to make a depot and port there to support any naval patrols.
>>65107810Elizabeth Island will be rediscovered when Drake's drum is beaten and from its harbour his flotilla will sail forth
>>65104764Argentina would get btfoThe Uk is not only a premier world fighting force, it commands global information influence The head of state of Argentina would immediately have photoshopped versions of his face circulated on social media, like was used to deplatform JD Vance and putler. If Argentina continued to resist, US tech companies would immediately get letters from London to delete Argentine social media accounts
>>65105208You say that, but the current leadership in the UK would love a distraction to rally the nationFunnily enough this whole situation parallels the original very closely, just both sides have degraded more
>>65104764Trump should lease Argentina some nuclear warheads and launch capable submarines. Just the threat of the Argies having a nuke button to press if they want to would be enough to force the brits into giving up the islands, because the brits understand that Argies are crazy enough to actually nuke them for real. UK should not be allowed any colonies at all, they have to give up everything in the Indian Ocean and Caribbean to us.
>>65108209Lmao you're brown
Why can't they just bribe the natives to secede? If they offered them a million each it'd cost 3.6 billion
>>65104764Trump might not help, but Argentina has almost zero military assets now.
>>65108209I hope there's a school shooting in usa tomorrow.
>>65104770Even if its navay was on the other side of the planet, has an airbase and permanent garrison on the island and Argentina has zero (0) strike capacities.
>>65108086>Elizabeth Island will be rediscovered when Drake's drum is beaten and from its harbour his flotilla will sail forthThe funny thing with Elizabeth Island is that the commonly shown map is drawn with east upwards instead of north. If you rotate the map with north upwards the island geology makes sense, the east side "lagoon" and the inlet is a fjord, caused by ice age glaciation from air being pushed upwards over the central mountain and precipitating on the lee side. Since the winds in this area are from the west to the east this asymmetric glaciation is to be expected.The common "explanation" of the island sinking beneath the waves is cope, islands this big does not sink like a freshly emerged small volcanic island and there are no known geological mechanisms that can submerge the island including the central mountain in a couple of hundred years. Elizabeth Island was-is only a fraction of the total size of the underwater structure. But it is completely gone.
>>65108086The Pactolous bank often mentioned as the supposed sunken remnant of Elizabeth Island is, judging by later era soundings and the lack of success in finding it again, a very steep volcano cone that once reached the sea level but was quickly eroded down to a shallow reef. This must have happened during during the ice age when sea levels were 120-125 meters lower than now. This explains the depth of Pactolous soundings (~130 m) as well as the material brought back up (basaltic pebbles) by the tallow in the plummet. The presence of a volcanic hotspot also explains the discolored water found in the area, as this must have been caused by iron, sulphur and phosphor rich hot water welling up from volcanic activitity, generating a local algae bloom which then floated eastwards with the surface current. Since the crust in the area is moving eastwards, there must be another underwater volcano located to the west of the Pactolous bank which generated this water plume. In other words, the Pactolous found the top of this guyout by a series of related but low probability events.
>>65105690The warheads also switched over to a US lease system about 8ish years ago. I assume to streamline the tritium refueling but I don't recall if the specifics of why was ever disclosed.
>>65109916You got one in Canada instead.
yes, because Trump would backstab the UK and force them to 'make a deal'
>>65104770>As for "why" - the Falklands has had lots of oil recently discovered thereThe fuck? Whale oil?
>>65105312>all of Argentina's navy is in this photoQuestion becomes, why are they all in port (the same port?) at the same time? They float, but can thay sail the open seas?
>>65108098>delete Argentine social media accountsYes, that would show them...
>>65110822>>65110825Good effort posting.
>>65111075He couldn't even force Ukraine to 'make a deal'
