What kind of retard faggots are spending almost $3 grand on a SCAR?
>>65109376smarter retards than those spending 4.5k+ on a scar
>>65109376The tactical timmies. The fudd boomers spend $3k+ on single-action revolvers.
Spending $3k on a SCAR is retarded, but not as retarded as spending $2k on an AR
>>65109383PSA is a little spooky at times when then have these crazy good deals. If I had a paying job I'd buy a couple of the ACOGs on sale for 899
I thought SCARs usually cost that much when fudds weren’t panicking
>>65109376>16" x51Fucking why?
>>65109376That's a good price.>b-but it's expensiveIt's not that much.>b-but you could get an AR-10 for half as much!And it would suck. Quality AR-10s that can be relied on cost just as much and often more. Meanwhile it's lighter than most AR-10s and more durable. You can also get very reliable metal magazines easily, which is simply impossible for the AR-10. You either get LaRue mags that are out of stock most of the time and cost more, or KAC magazines that are out of stock always and cost vastly more.
Anything under 3k for a SCAR of any flavor is a good deal. You many not think it's worth it, but that's what they go for.
>>65109457>look up deal>its a donut modelNot even at the price.
the retards are looking for deals at PSA
>>65109457They're literally always that price. They have been for years. Nobody wants that shit ass ACOG.
>>65109457PSA has upped the prices on a lot of things
>>65109376That's a fucking steal in today's market.>>65109598It's weird how much of a hatedom the SCAR has when it's a very reliable, accurate and light rifle. I've been nothing but happy with mine. You can't even blame Squid anymore because 90% of the board's current users weren't around back then.
>>65111627The only problem I have with the SCAR is that it ruined a direct thread can of mine.
What happens when a part breaks, are you required to send it back to Belgium like how Springfield Armory won't send you spare parts for your VHS?
>>65109564You don't need a 25 inch barrel to get good accuracy on 7.62 NATO, just good optics and being halfway competent
>>65111627>It's weird how much of a hatedom the SCAR has when it's a very reliable, accurate and light rifle.Nobody disagrees with any of this, we just point out that these qualities exist on piston rifles less than half the price. It's egregiously overpriced and you are a sucker for buying it, even if you do like the product and use it well.
>>65112065I bought mine for $2800 years ago, and that was a high price at the time, but a good buy in hindsight; they never recovered from the COVID/Saint Floyd panic pricing. What piston rifles are half the price, though? All the nice .308 ARs are just also $3-4k or worse (lol HK). I've tried a mid-priced .308 AR and was unimpressed enough that I bought a SCAR to replace it.
>>65109598>You can also get very reliable metal magazines easilyNot right now, but hopefully soon
>>65112065>qualities exist on piston rifles less than half the price.I'm actually curious what 308 pistol rifles can you get below the 2500-3k price line?
>>65112065>we just point out that these qualities exist on piston rifles less than half the priceName one. Reminder, we're talking .308 not 5.56 here.
>>65109564Remains super sonic at 1,000 yards. I don't see a problem there
>Sold OutI'm not mad at all. In fact, this is a good thing.
>>65109457>If I had a paying jobPSA customers in a nutshell.
>>65109376Millennials telling zoomers and alpha they know what they got trying to sell their stupid call of duty 2000s gun to them for too much biden bux
>>65109376https://youtu.be/lHCQQA70PAE?si=-BegA91ie72ZWsGf
>>65112708Do you think that the new SCAR won't be similarly priced? Genuine question. FN sees the market, they know what people are willing to cough up for the old version of the gun they are planning releasing the new version of. What world do you live in where you think FN, out of some sort of charity, is going to knock at least a grand off the sticker price instead of taking whatever internal number they initially planned and raising to parity with this?
>>65112794the new one is already retail priced at 3899 and has been selling that way for a few months now
>>65113013FN and HK are the avatars of greed jesus christ
>>65113264All the good semiauto .308s are priced roughly the same, the SCAR isn't even the worst, that honor goes to the SR25 I think, given it's reputation for being heavy and unreliable in service. But feel free to share which rifle is half the price and Just As Good™.
>>65113285Guarantee you my PSA AR10 Sabre can do anything a MR762 or SCAR can do with the same ammo.
