[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: C-UAS_05.jpg (125 KB, 684x1024)
125 KB JPG
Why can't we make drones go supersonic? Just strap a inlet cone and aerospike to microjet
>>
>>65121117
Seems like a lot of complexity when a solid fuel rocket could do the same job.
>>
They can but it increases costs enough it's not worth the effort.
Please use a Pepe as the OP pic for questions this stupid.
>>
>>65121119
I don't think solid motors can run for more than a minute.
>>
>>65121125
A lot of jet-powered munitions use solid rocket boosters at launch to reach the speeds necessary for the jet engines to function.
This dates back to WWII, and the tech was very common during the cold war. It's still used in things like anti-ship missiles.

What all these systems have in common is that they're big, expensive, and complicated.
Not the kind cheap temu-tier garbage used in modern drone spam.
>>
>>65121117
>Why can't we make drones go supersonic? Just strap a inlet cone and aerospike to microjet

They are too small. Supersonic flight becomes progressively easier the larger the aircraft is due to basic physics as aircraft volume increases proportional to the size increase ^3 but the surface area increases proportional to size increase ^2. That is why Concorde could supercruise across the Atlantic but F-22 cant. It could carry a much larger amount of fuel relatively to its drag generation so it could fuel four very thirsty and very large engines for hours. You can have your drone do supersonic flight but it wont be able to fly for long or for very far. I suggest you look up old fashioned ramjet surface to air missiles, the USN had an entire line of ramjet SAMs, the brit navy still used a ramjet SAM into the early 90s and the pajeets still use a SAM based on a ramjet engine. These are your supersonic drones.

You can see this in bullet speed loss charts, a bullet loses speed really fast when supersonic but once it is subsonic air drag decreases a lot. When you go supersonic you have to push the air in front of you out of the way faster than it can move so you compress it (takes a lot of energy) and this generates a sonic boom, when you are subsonic the air will flow around you and no boom is created.
>>
That's just a fucking missile at that point.
>>
>>65121117
The point of modern drones now is their being cheap, the experimental period where they were expensive testbeds for the Iraq conflict is long over. The more bullshit you add to them, the less point they have.
>>
>>65121117
That would be a missile.
>>
>>65121209
>>65121630
They already are missiles.
>>
>>65121630
Yeah but missiles don't run for 15 minutes
>>
>>65121173
>They are too small. Supersonic flight becomes progressively easier the larger the aircraft is due to basic physics as aircraft volume increases proportional to the size increase
Bullets are supersonic
>>
>>65121905
They fly instead
>>
>>65121117

G forces.

The true reason drones are cheap is because they don't need specialized electronics and guidance systems
designed to handle massive Gfroces or heat. While drones can use many commercial components missiles need every component specially designed to handle high gforces and high heat. Making those parts orders of magnitude more expensive, often patented and not mass produced.

The more you try to make a drone a missile the more it loses is cost effectiveness and progressively just becomes more and more similar a long range cruise missile.

All this said around 500km/h is a realistic speed that should be manageable without massive cost increases instead of the current common 200km/h which in my opinion is a bit too slow.
>>
>>65121905
Tomahawks are generally in the air for 1hr or more
>>
>>65122119
Hey man I just want a supersonic fpv drone to knock some sky tanks
>>
>>65122189
Get a TV guided missi I-i mean drone then. They've been around for decades
>>
File: Fritz_X_Guided_Bomb.jpg (2.01 MB, 3840x2560)
2.01 MB JPG
>>65122261
>They've been around for decades
Literally WWII-era tech, but then again so are atomic bombs...
>>
File: spike.jpg (11 KB, 640x418)
11 KB JPG
>>65121117
Just use rocket motors, no need to make fancy pants UAVs to counter flying lawn mowers
>>
>>65121117
>Why can't we make drones go supersonic? Just strap a inlet cone and aerospike to microjet
Because it's not needed.
>>
>>65121117
The energy consumed fighting aerodynamic drag is proportional to the square of your velocity. TranSonic and Supersonic flight require oodles of power which requires scads of fuel. It’s just not easy or worthwhile for small, light, cheap medium range missiles and “drones”.
>>
File: wait but.gif (1.6 MB, 350x197)
1.6 MB GIF
>>65121630
>missiles and drones and bombs are now a spectrum
>you must now respect MLGBUAV+ munitions
>>
mini nuclear ramjet drones or boring normal chemical/gas we could fill with with something spicy like azide azidoazide or some other super explosive thats like at least a dozen times stronger than RDX
>>
>>65122470
>something spicy like azide azidoazide
stop adding nitrogen you will not even be able to move this shit



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.