Why has no one ever tried space based jamming?
>>65144540power output
>>65144540They did and it was great, the second one was awful though.
Only one man would dare give me the raspberry
>>65144540Isnt that the yadro core concept?
>>65144546How much
>>65144549what?>>65144646lol
>>65144811three fiddy
>>65144549
>>65144817nta>Come on and _ _ _ _ and welcome to the _ _ _
>>65144540Jamming weakens with Inverse Square Law.Your jammer output/distance^2=How much jamming the target receives.A jammer only a mile away could be a hundred times weaker than the orbital jammer and still be a hundred times more effective. >>65144646May the Shwarts be with you.
Power output, maintainability, cost and treaties against the militarization of space.
>>65144811not enough
But do you know how big the space is?
>>65144540>space based jammingthat's just Electric Light Orchestra, bro
>>65144549Took me a second.
>>65144549It'd work if applied from a platform like project Pluto.We'd you need to come on and SLAM, and that'd welcome the jam.
>>65144540I think space cringe jamming would be more effective
>>65144540And what exactly makes you think "they" haven't, or don't?
>>65144549Haha
>>65144540
>>65148050>Generic Strawberry jamWhat a bunch of cheapo.
>>65144540>Why has no one ever tried space based jamming?That's classified.
>>65145396>treatiesAhahhahahahaaahhhhahahaah! Ho kay, Chang. We'll just listen.
>>65144540The inverse square law
>>65148221>t. Smuckers MIC shill
>>65148221>What a bunch of cheapo.Military procurement...
>>65148050My favorite part about this is that it actually would fuck up the radar
