>buy "bulletproof" plate>has no mark on it from when it was supposedly "bulletproofed"Was I scammed? They obviously never proofed it.
>>65159004It would make more sense to provide a sample pl8 made together that was tested, if you could trust provenance.And retain in a manner that would provide the support of a suit.
>>65159038Because they could just make a sample plate out of higher quality material and the full suit out of crappy iron.
>>65159004Just learned about the origin of the term?
>>65159303Making only one good piece and the rest crap is equally possible without it being a detached spare.Unless you want a bullet dent in every piece?Even then they could just use crap bullets weak enough for crap armor to withstand, call that proofing, and some would fall for it.At some point, you have to either trust someone, or check for yourself.
>>65159327Recognize his behaviour?
>>65159337Yeah I see retards like yourself do it all the time
>>65159340I guess you really do know others through yourself.
>>65159004lmaoaverage customer service caller
No refunds lol. I'll make a screenshot of your complaint, it'll go into my google drive of "customer complaints"
>>65159004If you could stand against the wall Sir we can proof it in a jiffy.
>>65159004Much like your intelligence, the CONCEPT was established, not the actual proof.
You retards are aware the armor in OP's image actually has a proof mark right?
>>65159963Proof of what?
>>65159004If you're in the US, all NIJ certified armor is submitted for testing and the active appearance on the NIJ CPL now counts as the "mark of proof" even though your plates specifically were never proofed. They are the same model as ones that were. NIJ then does random follow up tests every 1-2 years.https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/equipment-and-technology/body-armor/ballistic-resistant-armorIf your armor isn't on the above list, it wasn't proofed and you were had.
>>6515998290 proof. You need more proof?
