[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 93b.png (280 KB, 716x641)
280 KB PNG
Why cant countries come to an agreement on war terms like:
>We wont attack your civilian centers and stuff vital to civilians
>We wont attack your nuclear plants
>Fighting ends on sunday so you can collect the dead
>After certain criteria are meet war ends limiting casualties
Warfare was much more honorable back when they would kidnap you for a ransom and treat you well instead of sending you to a prison forced labour camp
>>
Because Russia exists that will treat you honouring those terms as a sign of weakness and attack anyway.

Read the wiki on the Battle of Ilovaisk in 2014
>>
>>65164323
Countries civil enough to accept those terms are civil enough to just not fight at all
>>
>>65164323
Comes down to the stakes and how badly you want to win. Plus honourable warfare as a concept is a weird little Westphalian artifact, never really existed outside of the countries who signed that treaty; and even then western wars were a lot nastier than we like to romanticize them as.
>>
>>65164323
If you fought a war with an enemy that reasonable couldn't you just... Not fight at all or set up some favorable trade agreement to both parties? War as a matter of settling disputes has been largely overtaken by the sheer modern monkeyness of "I MUST LAND GRAB"
>>
>>65164323
Civilized countries did. Barbarian hordes consider them as weakness
>>
>>65164323
because all gentleman's agreements go out the window when things start to go bad and your own population will Mussolini you if you lose
>>
>>65164323
Just declare your batchall, bro.
>>
>>65164441
But then barbarians ended up as slaves
>>
Because every person on earth thinks they are the exception for the rule they feel like breaking
>>
>>65164441
>Barbarian hordes consider them as weakness
And for as long as those barbarians exist, it IS a weakness they exploit regularly, both militarily and civilly
>>
>>65164323
guns and butter dilemma
>>
File: 172411405721869.png (923 KB, 1034x672)
923 KB PNG
>>65164323
Muslims are commanded by the Hadith to lie to kufirs (non-Muslims) and break treaties and ceasefires. You literally cannot believe a word they say because everything they do is toward the ultimate goal of destroying the non-Muslim world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudna
>>
No one likes losing and unless theres a more powerful country than both of you combined to set rules eventually one side goes low if they are losing.
>>
>>65164323
>we are stronger than you but we will cuck our self so its a more fair fight
are you retarded or just brown and trying to gimp the west?
>>
File: gun.png (52 KB, 240x232)
52 KB PNG
>>65166718
Its more like you value your soldier life and have enough honor not to attack civilians and respect the dead and stuff like that.
You know bombing civilian infrastructure is bad



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.