A drone might not breach it, but isn't it kind of useless as a tank if i blind it by having drones shoot the cameras with paintballs? Do they have wipers on these cameras? If not then it doesn't matter really what AI-controlled APS systems you have, if they can't see. I don't imagine the view is very good from those little slat windows on the hatch, and if you pop out to look then it sort of defeats the point of the tank then, doesn't it?
>>65228950yes do have whippers, would you like to buy one from us ? >t. Safran engineer that worked on this paseo model
>another 'dronefag thinks drones can do everything' thread>>>/trash/
>>65228950Seems like the same retard comes back every month with "What if we just used paintballs on the hulking mass of composite armour pointing a very large cannon in our direction".
>>65228950APS is typically radar.
>>65228950>having drones shoot the cameras with paintballs
>>65228950For the last time nigga, you can't beat a modern AFV/battle robot/spec ops force with paint
>>65229102stop sending people our way, we don't need you faggots shitting up our board
>>65228950> t.
>>65228950The US isn't Russia so probably already had something to expensively remove blinding agents from optical sensors in the 80s-90s that was mothballed due to the Cold War ending, and now has a modern even more expensive digital solution and financially wasteful yet still ultimately beneficial version that will and will work as planned against the enemy in a 1:99 ratio but in the 1 time it fails it will be paraded about by the third world monkeys and the 99 of their failures will be turned into dog food and their family given a bag of Cheetos (American). The crew of the US tank survived despite vehicle being knocked out and live the rest of their lives in generic pseudo mcmansions and their low point will be drunkly crashing a Camaro into a tree. The thirdie will live in a shed and his high point in life will be eating a steak dinner that cost what an American makes in 3 hours.
>>65229102I bet a drone could put things in the trash faster than that guy
>>65228981If you frog's had effective whippers then you wouldn't have lost Haiti.
>>65228950You're neither the first with this idea, nor faster than nature which immediately presented tanks with mud to live with.
>>65229102>burning tank noisesYeah, pretty much
>>65228950Because if you already got a drone that near an enemy vehicle you should have packed it with HE you imbecile.
>>65228950>Do they have wipers on these cameras?Yes. Do you really think they never thought of that?
>>65228950Way ahead of you champ.
