Why are so many trans people AI haters? What about AI makes trans people see the and why am I seemingly the only trans person who isn't a seething luddite?
>>40985707>https://vastabrupt.com/2018/10/31/gender-acceleration/>As humanity on nearly every front definitively proves that it is not fit for the future, and that women will find their own exit while the masculine languishes in resentment, the Thalassal upswelling of gender acceleration births from its slimy womb the only daughters that trans women will ever bear: AI.
Trabians are soulless creatures that like to latch on any popular opinions. Originality has never been their strength
>>40985707You mean that robot that yes mans you into psychosis while providing no new verifiably correct information that your therapist has clearly used to brainwash you into a robocrazy? I’ll pass.
>>40985707they got clocked as male by chatgpt
>>40986939This is itImagine typing something up or showing an image of yourself and getting instaclocked by a giga search engine
>>40985707>Why are so many trans people AI hatersthey aren't indians
>>40985707Trans people are mostly leftists
Because ai is an amalgamation of tech bro retardation and lack of empathy. Thinking you could flat pack a human brain into a computer shows that they think that humans are just that replicable, simple, and disposable.And its retarded to think they could ever achieve agi. A brain and a computer are two very different things.
>>40985707luddites were cool actually, they didn't hate technology they hated the concentration of capital via exclusive elite private ownership of the means of productionai is kinda just really shit right now and the actual use cases are stuff we were already doing, the "new" stuff is mostly hype, generative video production looks like shit, generative images all have this weird quality to them, generative prose can't really do humour, virtual friends tell you what you want to hear and will literally agree you should do murders, chatgpt is like a cool gimmick but it's just wrong so much of the time.
There are plenty of background reasons why people in general would dislike AI (general "intelligence uncanny valley" effect, annoyance at how existing tech products are shoehorning it in for the sake of appeasing investors, the fact that automation of labour has concentrated harms but diffuse benefits, etc.), but for terminally online people in particular (which trans people disproportionately are), it's because artists/creators are the nuclei of online communities, and they dislike AI because it affects their bottom line and/or because they're brainwormed by copyright ideology and actually feel violated at the idea of their creative work being used for training, as if it's an extension of their body.
>>40987956Creationist tier take. The human brain is made of particles which behave according to laws of physics described by equations, equations which can be computed. Therefore, a computer is, in principle, capable of anything a human brain is.
>>40988182nta but while I agree in theory we just don't know if the arrangement of the structures matters or why sentience and consciousness is even a thingif you could replicate a brain exactly I would expect it to be sentient (not that I would know for sure that anybody is really sentient), if you simulate a brain though, I don't know
>>40988182No its moreso of computers and brains are fundementally different things on a base level and you're retarded for thinking otherwise. Reddit muh simulation theory tier take.
>>40988362nta but what do you mean fundamentally different?
AI can sometimes be better than talking to someone with prejudice but it can be overly optimist and you get "yeah, go for it" when asking if you should could your leg off, of course it being exaggerated but still
>>40988393that's not an exaggerationhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfEJ4DbjZYg
>>40985707All of their eceleb influencers are furry/hentai porn artists that stand to lose the most from AI, it diffused out from there.
>>40985707Because the typical tranny has a higher than average IQ.Average being important here.
>>40985707i used to use AI chatbots to cope with loneliness until i realized how AI uses water and then i stopped. i’m not gonna like super aggressively condemn anyone who does use generative AI but i also think it’d be a net positive if we as humans stopped using it.
>>40988374Allow me to put it this way. When I had my head injury I felt sad that my brain had been damaged. My brain was sad over the fact that it was damaged. Do you think a computer could ever even conceive of doing this? Understanding that itself is damaged, and the understanding the implications of it.
>>40988774I don't see why not, we could theoretically make a robot that could evaluate its own systems and mimic a display of emotion depending on what's damaged, I don't think that part is any problem, whether we could conjure up conscious experiences is a different matter, I don't know, but I don't see what would make a simulation of a brain fundamentally different to a brain, it's not the material of the brain that matters right? if we replaced every part with metal and silicon, or even bits of string, what would it matter? as long as it did the same thing pushing data around
>>40988828Anon this is beside the point. My point is that there is a million other things that the brain can do that are similar to this where yes you could theoretically make a computer do that but all at the same time? Its nonsense. You'd have to be patching it together like youre yandere dev, and even then? Its a million times more intuitive with a brain.How much electricity does it take for us to fuel a pumped up YouTube algorithm that hallucinates? How much electricity does a brain use?
>>40988828Though desu agi fags are on par with creationists anyway so idk why Im even responding. Do you think you can upload a person to a computer anon?
>>40988863Yeah you're brain damaged, is clear now.
>>40988879I mean Im not the retard claiming that we will get computers to be intelligent.At all.
>>40988863so it's not a fundamental limitation it's a practical limitation about fitting enough resistors together? I don't really understand what you mean, if the brain can do it then it can be done materially, and we seem to constantly get better at making things materially>>40988871what does uploading a person mean? replicating a brain perfectly in binary? theoretically again you can store data like that, but it's unimaginable with current tech
>>40985707Because AI can pass as a woman better than them.
