If you have to tell people your pronouns you're not the gender you claim to be.
>>41022025based
>>41022025so, passing troons are real women?
>>41022025This is why enbies are fake
>>41022054Yes. Gender is not internal. It is a social construct that is constructed when someone interacts with you.
>>41022025You're on to something anon
>>41022054>so, passing troons are real women?>anti "preferred pronoun" guy hereNo.They aren't "real women", but they would be referred to as she/her because that is what would be logical.Take Buck Angel for example, there is no way that you could look at him from any distance and think "definitely a woman".By that token, if I was trying to point him out, using she/her would not make sense.
>>41022099There is no non-binary gender because of you have to tell everyone that you are non-binary..... then you arent
>>41022366Noticing a transwoman as a transwoman is still a logical position to call "she".Like, we get it.We see the costume and the divergence from manhood.
>>41022382No one assumes someone is "nonbinary", lmaoThere's no cultural precedent and no "uniform" for NB
>>41022111gender is teleological, you are what you are in the limit of increasing ability to self-modifyt. temporarily embarrassed jupiter brain
>>41022405Exactly. It doesn't exist.
>>41022443Incorrect.
>>41022481prove me wrong
>>41022506I did.
>>41022054passing is a mythtrannies never make a conclusive attempt to prove people actually see them as their chosen gender irl in a scientific study (i.e. comparing them to the opposite birth sex in an in-person lineup)Insisting online that some men look like women means absolutely nothing.
>>41022391>Noticing a transwoman as a transwoman is still a logical position to call "she".No it isn't.
>>41022366A man having sex with Buck Angel is normal heterosexual sex.
>>41022111that definition is no more grounded in reality than gender being what color eyes you haveyou are not immune to the epistemic darkness we're in
>>41022643based
