[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: min.png (533 KB, 576x430)
533 KB
533 KB PNG
Who else is a troon but also agrees with "terf"/radfem theory and talking points?
>>
>>41215762
I agree that there should be a considerable platform for cis women to voice their opinions and safety concerns regarding trans people but so much of what I see now in the uk is just hatred of ugly/unusual-looking/non-confirming people from folk that want to bring back public shaming.
>>
>>41215762
actually retarded
>>
>>41215762
i mean you should definitely be a radical feminist but i don't see how that'd make you agree with terfs since they categorically aren't
>>
>>41215762
Me! I don't think transgenders belong with females unlike transsexuals do
>>
>>41215770
Why would shame be a bad thing? Especially for troons, we need more shame if anything.
>>
>>41215807
They both don't belong.
>>
>>41215798
TERFs are feminists so tired of this stupid shit where we pretend they aren't, or else it looks bad.
>>
>>41215793
>>41215798
Thinking like this is what causes more people to turn to "terf" ideology. Why can't troons keep an open mind?
>>
>>41215762
occasionally they say something id agree with but theyre just too toxic to take in good faith
>>
>>41215824
go turn to it then retard
>>
>>41215825
Troons can be just as toxic.
>>
>>41215826
Troons can't be radfem as they're men. Those two are literally opposite.
>>
>>41215819
radical feminism is retarded of its own accord and is a dead academic fad, but TERFs aren't actually radical feminists
>>
>>41215833
>dead academic fad
I'd like to see your reasoning behind that.
>>
>>41215833
Really recommend you read the book enemy feminisms on the topic, saying they aren't radical feminists is just washing the movement's hands of its reactionary elements.
>>
the whole "women must be protected" logic leads to paternalism and gender roles instead of true equality so radfems end up aligning with conservatives inspite of themselves.
>>
>>41215827
so? i cant change them. i can only change my own actions and i try not to be toxic to anyone
>>
>>41215842
radical feminism is just accepting defeat and trying to gain concessions from the patriarchy since males will always be awful cause biology or something.
>>
File: IMG_2732.gif (990 KB, 400x356)
990 KB
990 KB GIF
>>41215762
A suspicious amount of these thread are getting made
>>
>>41215834
radical in a political sense is derived the latin radix i.e root - politics are radical insofar as they identify a single element as superior and causative of all others. To quote Marx because its provides probably the clearest example: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." This is radical (anti-)classism, it identifies class as the superior element to which all other elements are inferior and 'determined in the last instance' by. Radical feminism specifically arose from within, and as a critique of, Marxism - specifically they challenged the primacy of class at the level of anthropology since something prefiguring gender based casteism existed in pre-class social formations. The radfem retort to Marxism became: "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of gender struggles." since gender qua social caste predates economic class. The radfems were arguably correct on this point but this is only really a factoid, Marxism has a lot more moving parts that identify why class is the prime mover and radical feminism couldn't pose sufficient challenge or alternative explanatory power. Radical feminism was snuffed out pretty quickly, mainly by Marxists since that was the discourse it arose in, and it isn't a position that anyone today actually holds seriously (except maybe the handful of aged academics that spawned it). TERFs, for instance, wouldn't try to explain racism as a subordinate process of gender, they wouldn't try to explain labour disputes, the transition from feudalism to capitalism etc. etc, because they aren't actually radicals. Of course radicalism in normie political discourse just means 'more extreme' than the political centre but this is just idiotic illiteracy.
>>
>>41215848
That or work toward a world without males.
>>
>>41215917
Say that in tldr terms.
>>
>>41215842
What about the other alternative of getting rid of all men.
Men are clearly born with something missing, you can see it via their lack of empathy, intelligence, they might as well be a unwanted mutation, clearly something wrong went there.
>>
>>41215815
Women with a vagina belong with other women with a vagina
>>
>>41215933
Thanks for making clear you're a troon.
>>
>>41215808
Grow up.
>>
>>41215918
I don’t know how on one hand women are weak and males are strong thus need to be protected but at the same time think you can get rid of them all lol. Radfems really are fucking retarded.
>>
>>41215946
Part of maturing is understanding why shame is good, especially as a troon. If you can't understand this then you are either a retarded american or brainrotted through propaganda.
>>
>>41215947
Please tell me you're pretending to be retarded.
>>
>>41215950
> brainrotted through propaganda
Only applies to you moron
>>
>>41215936
I'm cis now after I got my pussy
>>
>>41215960
No please tell me how your going to wipe out all the evil violent male rape machines that are totally not going to fight back.
>>
>>41215961
>>41215967
Actual slave mentality.
>>
File: 1758612543933822.png (3 KB, 641x628)
3 KB
3 KB PNG
>>41215762
I agree with them, but in the sense that they're right we're going to take over and destroy cis women's rights in the process and that our demographics are mutually exclusive in social acceptance and order. Obviously though, as someone with a spine, I hope us trans women win that fight.
>>
>>41215980
You know you're on the wrong side of history, right?
>>
>>41215986
History doesn’t have a right or wrong side you juvenile idiot.
>>
>>41215992
Crazy how you troons can't realize how your ideology is inherently destructive.
>>
>>41215950
Children think shame is good and have the same reasoning for it as you do. Maturing is growing past it.
>>
>>41216037
Anon is no older than 19, just let the world tear them to bits.
>>
>>41216037
Say that to the ones suffering today because of decades of troon crashouts and insanity, you're literalling crashing your own movment to the ground. You people have no sense of optics.
>>
>>41216052
When did this board turn into an almagation of tiktok and tumblr? This place was unironically less schizo back a few years ago.
>>
>>41216058
A boo boo
>>
>>41215971
Keep coping.
>>
>>41216062
Beats me I haven’t been on here much since 2016 definitely changed for the worst
>>
>>41216078
>>41216074
You realize you are digging yourself a grave, right?
>>
>>41215837
nta but that's like saying stalinists are communists- from a purely descriptive standpoint they are categorically not. i don't think it's whitewashing to make the same point re. terfs- there are reactionary elements and wreckers in all movements, feminism incl., just call em such and throw em out
>>
>>41216090
Why are you such a crybaby?
>>
>>41216090
You didn't get bullied enough
When you say shame is necessary is it perhaps a projection? If anyone needed to be shamed, it was you
>>
>>41216001
>your ideology is inherently destructive
It is, but that's based. The afab overlords need to be knocked down a few rungs.
>>
>>41216944
I fight with the afabs against transgenders like you
>>
>>41215842
Yeah. Cis women just want privilege that comes with equality, without any of the bad shit.
>>
>>41215931
Without men, advanced society would just collapse.
>>
>>41217563
Without men we would have utopia
>>
>>41217622
Men do all the jobs that keep advanced society running. They'd be no electricity, working water, or even food without men.
>>
>>41217738
They also troon out, destroying society itself in the process.
>>
>>41217755
Men are the goodest of the good, and baddest of the bad. Most geniuses are men, while simultaneously most retards are men. Most things we have that makes life convenient was because a man invented it. Most artists and philosophers are men. Men are the romantics, women just receive, not provide.
>>
>>41217813
AGP hands typed this post.
>>
>>41217738
Men can be easily be replaced, its all low iq manual labor
>>41217813
Men have ruined the whole planet with their greed
>>
>>41217755
Men who become women are the only sane men
>>
>>41217834
Like actual braindead animals, not even dogs because at least they're capable of a minimum of social intelligence.
>>
>>41217848
Still a troon, there's no such thing as what you just said. They're just TIMs.
>>
>>41217831
Can't argue with facts, eh?
>>41217834
>Men can be easily be replaced, its all low iq manual labor
Being an electrician is low IQ? Farming isn't simple, either, otherwise Zimbabwe wouldn't've collapsed in on itself. If you think women are these perfect little angels then you're naive. They'd slit each other's throat if they had a chance at landing a high-value man. They're just better liars, and avoid accountability like the plague. They have the vote, without having to sign up for the draft, an actual visible sign of systematic sexism.
>>
>>41217934
>They have the vote, without having to sign up for the draft, an actual visible sign of systematic sexism.
Who set that up. Based communist countries did everything better
> They'd slit each other's throat if they had a chance at landing a high-value man
High value men are gone.
>>41217864
Srs exists
>>
>>41217966
>Based communist countries did everything better
And who are these great communist thinkers?
>High value men are gone
So men were more high value when they sexist?
>>
>>41217984
Good. Leftists need to get a taste of what they vote for.
>>
>>41217966
Still a TIM.
>>
>>41215762
Feminism is a retarded pipe dream. Most men are just physically and mentally superior to most women, so they can never compete with men. That's why the government has to constantly step in. Art and media was better before feminism stepped in and turned all, once great, IPs into shit. Women are narcissists at their core. They hate attractive women in media, because they believe they're entitled to feeling beautiful, which is literally narcissism.
>>
>>41217984
Transexual women are females
>>
>>41218214
Cope.
>>
>>41218164
Men ruined the planet and their art is mid
>>
transexual women are men with open wounds
>>
>>41218226
>Men ruined the planet
Without men, advanced society wouldn't've been built, so women would've just been eaten by animals. So, you're right. They'd be no humans to fuck up the planet.
>their art is mid
Literally most art and culture is by men. Also, the slang "mid" was probably invented by a man too.
>>
>>41218226
>Men ruined the planet
Women are the biggest consumers.
>>
>>41218485
Not even true btw
>>
>>41218298
>Without men, advanced society wouldn't've been built.
Yes, so men ruined the whole planet.
>>
>>41218558
Look up the statistics. Women are the biggest consumers of capitalism.
>>41218569
Yeah, the Earth world be better off without women or men.
>>
>>41215917
Good post. Annoying how rare it is to find marxists on here, I guess blaming myself to for playing to pre-existing discourse styles on here.
>>
>>41215925
Responsible people should have their shit taken from them by force. With feminists only pointing out it's mainly white men that are responsible people.
>>
>>41220600
The discourse style here being:
>*posts something in good faith*
>"That's wrong, and you're fucking stupid."
>"How am I wrong?"
>*never replies*
>>
>>41221398
You’re mad that the anon didn’t tldr it? I’m not even sure what interaction that greentext is covering tbdesu

My breakdown of what was said is that radical feminism doesn’t have the explanatory power to describe the shift from pre-modern to modern socioeconomic and political forms. Marxism more accurately identifies where this shift came from and what it implies, including but not limited to gender structures.
Hence radfem ideology being critiqued from within and assimilated into the larger marxist pov, while those radfems who are still operating as if feminism is the major site of struggle have fallen into a kind of reactionary liberalism in the face of the world today.
>>
>>41215762
op you're a piece of shit
>>
>>41221398
>>41222113
Or maybe you’re agreeing that discourse styles in this board is fucked and something to be overcome/avoided.

Feels rare for people to engage if it’s not the usual poltard, gooner, or trutrans talking point arguing for their respective right to exist/denial of the other’s right to exist.
>>
>>41222113
Calm down, asshole. You're acting like some sort of cunt.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.