Do trannies even know what the word bi means
>>41227783what is your point?
>>41227815My point is trannies are retarded
>>41227783Bimodal means that you have two statistical modes. That's not the same as only having two possibilities in your sample space.Take a statistics class before posting again, you pseudointellectual dipshit.
>>41227875It’s called bi-modal because it has two points/ends. That’s what bi means. Two. There are only two sexes and the/their nuances leading up to such states. That is bimodal. It’s runs on binary ends/points. Please update your Latin. Bi means two or twice.
>>41227873you haven't explained why. you honestly seem like the retard here if nobody understands what you're saying and you can't even explain it.>>41227875Yea I have no idea what OP is getting at. do they think these are the same thing? everyone knows what "bi" means
>>41227875There’s two possible peaks/modes.
>>41227894the trans people here are very much binary ie they don't think there are more than 2 genders. please just go back to Boomerbook, you are lost and confused.
>>41227894>Anon owns the libs by being retarded
>>41227917>the trans people here are very much binary ie they don't think there are more than 2 gendersWhy are you lying? There’s an endless amount of genders you chud!
>>41227922>2014 humoryou desperately need to go back to Facebook, I'm not even joking
>>41227894>>41227906>>41227908Yeah, bimodal means there's two values that occur most often. Maybe y'all should learn what "modal" means.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_(statistics)
>>41227967>still explaining things that we already know without explaining to us how or where we have expressed any confusion or misunderstanding about these termswell?
>>41227783I do feel like when trans people argue that sex is bimodal there’s some disingenuous parts of that argument. Even if sex is bimodal, the people who are in that inner range are intersex, not trans. Most trans people are not intersex. It’s like a discussion about apples and then someone says “what about oranges”. What’s the point of that? And no I don’t believe it when these people say they’re “speaking for intersex rights”. We don’t need people to stroke their saviour complexes about our lives, it’s pretty demeaning
>>41227978>Still bitching about the prefix "bi" without acknowledging that the entire term "bimodal" doesn't tell you shit about what possibilities a sample or population has, just that there's two most commonly occuring outcomeswell?
>>41228010>still incapable of having a conversation or making a coherent pointok bye retard
>>41227919So you can’t into Latin. Got it.
>>41228020We know what "bi" means. You haven't explained how we are misusing or misunderstanding this term despite being asked to do so repeatedly. It's genuinely astonishing how fucking stupid you actually are.
Trannies and double digit iq fad hoppers have taken education back decades.
>>41228025you already know this faggot is one of those "its not transphobia cuz im not scared of trannies!" midwits. most likely 12 years old
>>41228025When someone tells you sex is binary, and you respond with “no it’s bimodal”, then that someone has full right to just turn around and walk away from you, so as to not risk lowering their intelligence to your level when engaging with you. Because retardation is infectious.
>>41228042So basically you got into an argument with some tranny online and came here to vent to us about how you got owned. Got it.
>>41228042>retardation is infectious I 100% believe this:— “It's a universal translator. We're not even supposed to have it. I'll tell you why. Human thought is so primitive it's looked upon as an infectious disease in some of the better galaxies.” -Men in Black (1997)
>>41228025If you REALLY wanted to insist that there's only two genders, you'd pull out the binomial distribution. Completely different concept from a bimodal distribution.Either way, you clearly don't know statistics.>Pic of Bernoulli for shiggles
>>41228050I got owned for being correct? What? Are you that cognitively disassociated/warped that you can’t even identify fact from fiction anymore? Once, I remember telling zoomers on a park bench that you can see the moon in the day—and they immediately called me a retarded boomer (not verbatim), and so I just walked away. Retarded people can’t entertain being wrong ever. They also don’t want to risk losing their retarded friends for upping or attempting to up their intelligence.
>>41228042gender IS bimodal tho, retard. splitting pointless hairs is the most pseudo intellectual shit imaginable
>>41228042You have to be baiting, nobody can possibly be stupid enough to think that the prefix of a word determines the entire word's meaning. This is like if you insisted that biannual and bisexual were the same thing because both of them have bi at the start. Binary = there are only two things and everything is either A or B, bimodal = there are two big clumps with overlap and lots of gradation.
>>41228077I am not interested in discussing this in any serious way with you. You aren’t really saying anything meaningful. I’m more interested in psychologizing about what motivated you to post this retarded nonsense in the first place. It was absolutely some tranny you got into an argument with who you’re still seething about. Probably blocked you so you had to come here to vent and take it out on us. Now you’re jerking yourself off about how smart you are. Pretty pathetic.
>>41227783you're really making a whole thread about it this time huhbait someplace else this isn't even fun to talk about
>>41228080He’s not arguing it’s not bimodal. He’s saying that arguing ‘binary =|= bimodal’ is a disingenuous and dishonest front.
>>41228098Nope. He’s got a point. You freaks just love to overcomplicate the simplest shit to make yourselves feel better. Sex is a binary fact of reality. The nuances don’t change that.
>>41228121>>41227783samefag
>>41228133>abloobloobloo
>>41228121>posts screenshot of 4chan post referencing twitter post>You disagree with my shibboleth so you're a freak and retardedMost advanced /pol/bot
>>41228121As Einstein said: “If you can’t explain it simply enough, you don’t understand it well enough”, and trannies definitely don’t understand their shit well enough.
>>41228269>Tranny: "actually gender is bimodal">You: *500 word screed about the Latin roots of the prefix 'bi'*
>claims to be bisexual>has had sex more than two times in his or her life
Dawkins has spoken >>>/sci/16798826
>>41227894lol okay so anything with the prefix 'bi-' implies that it is actually binary. (definitely not, it's just a friggin prefix)
>>41228641Surprisingly chill for 4chan standards
>>41228716Bi means two. Always has denoted two. If you’re bi that means you’re intro males and females. Two sexual attractions. It’s that simple.
>>41228042You do realize that the actual sign of mental retardation is refusal to accept any other views past yours and refusal to understand basic new concepts like you're doing right now? :)
People focusing on a prefix and refusing to acknowledge the rest of the word will never cease to amuse me
>>41228819>You do realize that the actual sign of mental retardation is refusal to accept any other views past yoursSo just believe anything you’re told? Idiot. Use your critical thinking skills here buddy. You’re meant to entertain not just blindly believe.
>>41228852There's not much that scares me, but that Python code in that image...that's terrifying
>>41227984Sorry but trans people ARE intersex depending on the binary that is being argued for. They have both male and female traits. Intersex people are always brought up because our opponents attempt to argue for an XY - XX binary, which does not exist in humans. They attempt to make some kind of scientific appeal that invalidates trans people, but this is easily refuted as good science does not just ignore data (intersex people) to try to arrive at presupposed conclusion.
>>41228911Holy irony please get off 4chan and stay off it for at least a week
>>41227894bicycle means there are only two wheels ever
>>41227894>>41227783This is the problem, you can't reason with literal retarded people
>>41228789dude please curb your retardation it's a goddamn prefix
>>41229647Yes. It’s not a tricycle.
>>41230447He’s not wrong though. Why call someone retarded for being correct? Did your parents teach you to do this?
>>41227783It's only the *characteristics* considered masculine or feminine that are bimodal. Sex itself is binary.
>>41230479it's a fucking prefix. it indicates "two of something". there's not inherent XOR (⊕) to this.
>>41230517It literally means two. Whether it’s a prefix or not is irrelevant.
>>41230517Prefixes have been used as singulars over time. You don’t need morph after xeno. A Xenomorph IS a xeno. Xenos became its own plural.
>>41230576>>41230603literally bots with -100% mental flexibility. i bet you studies business administration.
>>41230683They’re not wrong and you’re simply an idiot. Many such cases.
>>41230858genuinely open a book and read up on etymology.
>>41230916Listen. Either you argue it doesn’t mean two, or it does mean two. Which are you?
>>41230924...>>41230916
>this prefix has to have the same meaning literally every time i read it because otherwise my little brain is gonna EXPLODE> and i'm not gonna consider any other potential meanings and implications beyond that because my brain is gonna EXPLODE if I do that and then my parents may realize I'm actually smart enough to hold down a job and kick me out of their basementgenuinely be not retarded for one fucking picosecond
>>41230939There’s no third position anon.
>>41230962They’re not wrong though. The prefix still means two. That it’s a prefix doesn’t mean it doesn’t mean two. bi- (2) and tri- (3), quadri- or quadru- (4), followed by quinque- or quinti- (5), and then sexa- (6) and so on.
my honest rxn to this thread
>>41230603xenopavilia is my favorite porn artist too lol
>>41230980lol wtf are you talking about a binomial probability distribution does not imply that the underlying constituents are (appropriately normalized) Dirac delta functions.you may easily superpose two exponential functions of the form f_i(x)=c_i*e^(-kx^2) and normalize them + restrict their domains such that you yield a cumulative pdf that has a range B ∈ [0,1] and is continuous with non-zero values between the maxima and it would still be considered a binomial distribution.literally open a book.
(no i'm not gonna write up a formal proof of that statement cause I'M FUCKING DRUNK, hmmkay?)
-a mode is derived from a set of elements.-if we modify mode with bi (two) this refers to two modes. -two modes are derives from two sets of elements.-a set can have multiple elements.2 * n > 2 for all n where n > 1
mathematics is incomplete and there exist unprovable statements i'm literally gonna kill myself
>>41231059Anon bi either means two or it doesn’t.
>>41231222anon you should seek disability for mental retardation
>>41227894Based baiter
>>41231250You only have insults now. Cute frogposter.
>>41231307If i am BI-lingual, i can speak two languages to a certain degree, not one or the other. It is NOT an exclusive OR.
>>41231345Yes. It’s bi because you know two languages. You’re very nearly there.
>>41231482>>41231222>>41230998Hey retard, I already explained this to you almost 12 hours ago before I left for work. Can you not read?>>41228098
>>41233296Aaaand you’re still retarded. Got it.
>>41231059>>41231106Thank y'all for being legit in this thread of "bUt bI mEaNs TwO!!!1" anons
