Why is the whole zoomer "looksmaxxing" community so homoerotic in tone? The way they talk about other men and "chad" is really gay.
>>41243602>Why is the whole zoomer "looksmaxxing" community so homoerotic in tone?Because is men glazing each other.
>>41243602because the whole community is built around idolising attractive masculine features so of course it'll come off as gay. The average zoomer who engages in looksmaxxing functions relatively normally from personal experience because it's at its core just self improvement. For the people that get overly into it it's a way to find role models and basically just a cope for their own shitty life like everything else e.g. a bunch of incel, I would know. I doubt it's any repressed homosexuality and rather just the masculine search for community though yeah it'll obviously look pretty gay to an outsider
>why is men talking about men beingmen homoerotic in tonethe world may never knowOn a more interesting note, male spaces are not actually gay. If you introduce any females then social cohesion is destroyed: everyone gives all their attention to the female.
>>41243602How is wanting to be at your physical and aesthetic peak as a man "homoerotic"? Some of these looksmaxxing tips you see are questionable if not complete bullshit but it still doesn't make the idea of looksmaxxing homoerotic.
>>41245726>chaser is a looksmax incellol
a ton of them have very repressed gay feelings desu
>>41243602Stop projecting your faggotry on everyone else. Wanting to self improve as a male being gay is a feminist talking point
does this work
>>41243602I think they are all gay. every time a man says that men are prettier than women, you know you are talking to a fag
>>41245775He is also the most famous closet case here.. who is surprised?
