Reminder that AGP has been debunked, chuds.
it's true, they really do know about sissy hypno porn
>>41252190then why does agp perfectly describe my every waking thought to a t
>>41252190Note she won't actually give an answer if you ask how its been debunked.
>>41254838moser
>>41254885They'll do that too, rush to find the first study that "refutes" Blanchard, paying no mind to the actual quality of the study itself, or the fact that it has been refuted by newer, better studies (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02359-8).If someone cites Moser, 2009, you know they're not seriously engaging with the theory, and just looking for anything that confirms their biases.
>>41252202picrel is too funny can't be real
>>41254916tldr
>>41254838Its debunked via the fact of phallometry being retarded
>>41252190who fucking cares, it's not refuted either way. people in the sexual research space and even psychology in general overwhelmingly believe Blanchard as there is genuinely no paper in the literature, which hasn't been disproven, that successfully refutes the core of Blanchard's claim. only fuckwit doing any research on the transes is Kevin hsu, and he's Blanchard's biggest fanboy
>>41252190AGP was recently proven 100% true
Who cares? TERFs are misusing the term in either case since Blanchard very much advocates that "AGP" transition.
>>41257048Where? I'm curious what the evidence you have is, and I'm a Blanchardist.
agp is unfalisifiable
>>41252202Hilarious video
>>41254916>look chud we funded le study which supports our argument that your le study isn't good science !!
>>41252190It literally doesn't matter whether AGP has been refuted or not. 99% of the time people don't use AGP in the Blanchardian sense but rather as a term for creepy non-passing porn addicted predators.
>>41257670gender dysphoria is unfalsifiable
>>41252190AGP and more specifically AGAMP describe me perfectly. Is it a fetish?
5 seconds looking at any transbian space on the internet will prove that AGP is obviously real
>>41258014No, its a sexual orientation.
>>41257762This but unironically. Show me your study refuting my refutation.
>>41258014agp is an orientarionagamp is a fetish
>>41254838Well, a big point would be that the phallometry tests they used are barely more respectable than polygraph tests, which are considered junk science.
>>41252190then why are agps so motivated to deny it vehemently? meanwhile, you tell any flaming faggot turned trans about hsts vs agp and they wont even know what youre talking about nor care
>>41252190>>41252202I don't understand. Why would people knowing about these things mean "it's over"? I mean, they're wrong from the get-go, but:>AGP and HSTSSome people get turned on at things you disapprove of. Okay, guess it's over.>Forced femSame as above.>Prisons/locker roomsThis applies more to prison guards and gym teachers, many-fold, than to the scenario being imagined. I've even come across news stories where the "rape" being discussed even turned out to be completely consensual sex, e.g. pic rel.>Feminization hypno pornSome people get turned on at things you disapprove of.>StealthingIs it supposed to be a bad thing that you avoid hate crimes? Inb4 "muh rape by deception". Are makeup and lying about body-counts or fertility also "rape by deception"?>DetransitionersChrist-cucks are ashamed to be themselves. What else is new.>Surgeries on minors and disabled(By disabled they mean autistic people who have more agency than normgroids anyway.) Most people are fine with families and doctors making medical decisions with a 16 year old. You can observe this by knowing boob-jobs are legal and performed much more frequently than trans surgeries on this same age group.
>>41258181How do I fix it
>>41257840true as well
>>41258085AGP should be redefined as misogyny that is so strong, it manifests itself as a desire to replace women, with a belief that they are better than women.
>>41254916Blanchard was too stupid to differentiate trans women from cross dressers, drag, or gays. He was a fucking idiot who got away with scientific misconduct.
>>41258085>"Muh selective perception means it's real hurrdurrr".
>>41258382That makes no actual sense. lol.
>>41252190>bases my entire life around posts and "theory">actually you can't believe in agps because it's unscientificWhat did transgender ideology mean by this?
AGP is obsolete and based on poor quality research and it would be dead if not for the controversy, ths theory has 0 clinical relevance and nowadays serves either as transphobiafuel or myers briggs for trannies.Blanchard has correctly noticed that gynephilic trannies are more likely to be AGP than andophilic ones, this in itself shouldn't be that much suprising. But apart from that, everything about the typology is either unproven, unfalsifiable or just wrong. And by that I mean the rigid divide into 2 types, the theory about why AGPs and HSTS want to transition, the theory about where does AGP come from, everything about meta-attraction, the assumptions that AGP doesn't exist in cis women etc.>>41254916The Bailey, Hsu 2022 study you've quoted doesn't disprove cis AGP. It does disprove Moser with his 93%, but it fails to prove the non-existence of AGP in cis females, in fact the data suggest that it would be around 20% or even more of them. This study clearly shows that AGP is something that can and does appear in cis women, it would be interesting to compare how their AGP manifests compared to trannies, but no one has done that yet.>>41258306>then why are agps so motivated to deny it vehemently?ever read The Trial by Franz Kafka? When a person is accused of something bad, their first reaction is to deny it, but eventually they begin to accept it as part of themselves, regardless of whether they actually did it or not. AGP allegations are serious, no one would want to be called a pervert like that.
>>41258522Do polsaars think this sentence makes any sense?
>>41258530>The Bailey, Hsu 2022 study you've quoted doesn't disprove cis AGP. It does disprove Moser with his 93%, but it fails to prove the non-existence of AGP in cis females, in fact the data suggest that it would be around 20% or even more of them. This study clearly shows that AGP is something that can and does appear in cis women, it would be interesting to compare how their AGP manifests compared to trannies, but no one has done that yet.I fully admit that some women do seem to experience AGP, or at least something like it.When it comes to AGP and gender identity, you have a lot of studies that touch on a truth, but do not encapsulate the full truth.Blanchard is right in identifying AGP, Docter seems to be right in acknowledging that late dysphorics have multiple gender identities, Veale is right in noticing that repression enormously affects life tragectory and manifestation of dysphoria, and even the Moser study touches on the truth that it is possible for women to experience AGP.
>>41258552Yes, but I don't expect you to understand it.
>>41258560Explain it, h1b rajeeshPost hand as picrel
>>41258558I'm actually glad we agree on things. Happens rarily on this board.
>>41258507>t. Incel in his mom's undies
>>41258530>AGP is obsolete and based on poor quality researchCompare the quality of research that the competing theories of it's era had, like Exotic becomes Erotic. It was the highest quality research of it's time. It's time was 50 fucking years ago, when the standards of what it meant to be trans was completely different than it is now and being simply gay was illegal in half the country. Freud is obsolete as well, but we still use psychosis and neurosis. AGP is useful in the same way.>no one would want to be called a pervert like that.If you're going to be serious about science, stick closer to the science terminology. Having such blatant bigotry towards paraphiliacs, and that includes people with paraphilic disorders isn't becoming of you.
