>constantly fill out their chests with silicon to look like real women>pump oil into their asses and thighs to make it look like they are fertile>constantly cover themselves with plaster and carcinogens to make it look like they're children (probably all pedophiles)>get disfiguring facial surgeries that make them barely look human>constantly dress in ways that are attractive to themselves, for blatant sexual purposesother examples?
>>41261390i love these threads. can't wait to discuss blanchardism yet again
>>41261390also, the way they speak about men they like isn't that different from what blanchardfags call meta-attraction, they do sometimes lust over their bodies, but it's always more self-centered, ie. focusing on what an object of attraction would do with their female bodies. you constantly hear things like "i want a man taller than me bc i want to feel like the small one, or like a woman in this relationship", so yeah, baing able to perform a female role is a vital part of female sexuality
reminder that one of the biggest reasons AGP got thrown out of scientific literature for decades until the resurgence in political brainwashing brought it back was that when they surveyed cis women for "AGP" roughly 80% of them also qualified for a diagnosis which actually worked to prove that having "AGP" meant that trannies were closer to being women mentally than once thought
>>41261684if the survey you have mentioned is Moser 2009 then you're not exactly right, Moser's questionnaire has tampered with original Blanchard's questions. If you go by the Bailey and Hsu 2022 study where they asked the original questions, the it would be closer to 25%. That still proves that AGP is kind of normal amongst cis women, although it's not universal.Still, if this board suddenly experienced an influx of cis women making posts about their life while also larping as trannies, they would probably get a lot of AGP allegations too
>>41261720>Moser's questionnaire has tampered with original Blanchard's questionsonly to rephrase them in a way that makes sense to ask a cis womanredoing it with bizarre wordings to ask an afab person like "do you get erections when dressed in a female costume" is going to falsely bring down the affirmative answers because it just doesn't make sense to begin with
>>41261733>only to rephrase them in a way that makes sense to ask a cis womanthat was the intention, but by doing this there was also a lot of other cues added to the questionnaire, one question was about arousal from wearing lingerie and Moser has added something along the lines of "in anticipation of sex" and that already would shift the focus from their own female bodies to some partner they could anticipate to have sex with, therefore these cues lowkey ruin the questionnaire.
