the paradox of society:women are both less intelligent than men, but also retain a degree of social and emotional control men don't havehow did this arise?
Because they aren't less intelligent. random quantitative measures of intelligence like winning chess or something else men might care about are not a good measure of intelligence, which is multidimensional and contextual.Women are better at everything except physical strength and endurance, and since we have moved beyond clubbing each other to death with sticks and taking over city states at spearpoint they are now better at being people
>>41292394Average woman is smarter than the average man. Men just have more variance so the dumbest will be men and the smartest will also be men
>>41292438>Because they aren't less intelligentyeah they are, they can't build anything or create their own worlds, they are entirely reliant on men for food, shelter, support
>my gender is better than your gender>nuh uh my gender is bettergrow up, go outside, have sexyou're a loser, other members of your gender actually making good contributions to society doesn't change the fact that you personally are a fucking wasteengaging in these retarded schoolyard debates about whether the boys are stinkier than the girls or whatever is rotting your brainmen and women are losers
>>41292499But you fail to show how "being reliant on men" means that they are less intelligent. If relying on men is more practical and is a net benefit to you then it is more intelligent.Your thinking already seems stubborn and ego driven, hallmarks of obsolete male thinking.
>>41292577because they cannot create civilization of the tools of society on their owntheir brains are specialized for verbal manipulation and not having any sort of empathy, shame, or guilt, but they lack the spatial skills and overall cognition to build metal, bricks, and the pieces of civilization.
>>41292638(1) you fail to show how being unable to "create civilization on their own" means they are less intelligent. If civilization was already created it is possible it is no longer necessary to create civilization.(2) fail to show why being specialized for verbal manipulation is less intelligent. Fail to show how empathy shame or guilt have utility. Fail to demonstrate "spacial skills and overall cognition" is essential. Building metal or bricks is something you can get someone else to do for you apparently.Your thinking appears flawed. You fail to consider that if making other people do something brings more net benefit than doing it yourself it is more intelligent.Also flawed in that you make assumptions that lack predicate i..e. "cresting civilization" being essential. Forging swords is no longer a cornerstone of civilization, neither is riding horses.(
>>41292760show a civilization built mostly by women
>>41292767i think the points i’ve derived from this is that, yes women are unable to build a civilization.but we don’t need to build them anymore, they’re built. women excel in the niche that exists right now, social stuff. in first world nations we don’t do killing, guys have lost their niche
>>41292831>yes women are unable to build a civilization.because they are stupidthey lack the cognitive processing and organization to do what men can
>>41292840I think it has more to do with civilization being built in extremely primitive wartime times before most technology. Most fighting now is done with drones and stuff. Not to mention how vague and circular your point is. What is building civilization anyway? What key acts were involved and how do you know men were responsible. Who invented writing? How do you know men did that? Who invented farming? How do you know it was men?
>>41292900civilization is a continuous process of the actions of men
that is quite the paradox!
>>41292638>because they cannot create civilization of the tools of society on their ownyou think the people you pay taxes to can?
