is a 30' underbust with 36' hip circumference and a 16.5' bideltoid bad for a 5'9" troon? am i doomed to be a brickhon?
>>41332062kinda sorta if yo have fat hips you might be good but ngl kinda cooked
posting both bideltoid and hip circumference together is meaningless give us your hip width too
>>4133220712.2in </3
>>41332270post unsee idk what zat means
>>41332062Well, what're your thoughts on reincarnation?
>>41332062The bideltoid is kinda shit for your height
>>4133206230in is the absolute maximum underbust to pass. so its not over but also not great
>>41333524A 29 inch underbust is average for fit women, where do you get that cutoff from?
>>41333677the average woman is way fatter than trannies even at healthy bmi
>>41333677yeah trannies usually try to lose weight at some point and see how tight they can get their waist/underbust
>>41333690That number is allegedly from a US army dataset, so I doubt they'd be fat. https://www.reddit.com/r/ABraThatFits/s/O58vquFKq8I tried to dig up the measurements from the linked document but it seems to be in zip files and I'm on mobile. So might be bullshit but j doubt it
>>41333740ANSUR is full of fatties and I’m sure a Reddit post would be worse. It’s important to note a woman at the same bmi as a male will still have higher body fat due to smaller skeleton, just look at women outside and see how many have super visible ribs like trannies do
>>41333808The measurements aren't from a reddit survey, the post is referencing ansur. The post claims ansur uses "fit" women but j can't verify on mobile. If someone on a desktop can dig into it that would be great.This website has some unsourced claims on average bra size where 30" would be well in the range of normal:https://www.thirdlove.com/blogs/learn/average-bra-size-by-ageKeep in mind that these are also going to be from shorter women on average than 5'9
SHUT UPPPPP!!!!!
>>41333868I’ve ran the numbers before and over 50% of ansur is overweight. But again either way you can’t compare with average cis women bc trannies usual have model tier body fat levels and most models are above 5’9 and with an underbust around 26in
>>41333895Sure, but if you want to pretend that the only difference between the average model and the average cis woman is their height and body fat percentage, that would be wrong too. Modeling selects for specific body shapes beyond that and of course most women won't fit into that, trannies or not
>>41333942It’s not an uncommon shape for cis women above 5’9 tho. The main point is a tranny and cis woman with the same underbust measurement DO NOT look the same, so trannies need to meet a higher standard
>>41333997Then where do you take the specific 30" cutoff from if not from averages?
>>41333997And also, where are you taking the what's common at a certain height for cis women from? I haven't been able to find anything that correlates height with band size, and I have looked
>>41333524My sporty sister has the same as me at 31Im 5'7 tho
>>41334020>>41334077It’s an estimate based on women with bmi under 20. ANSUR can give you underbust vs height but there aren’t enough women above 5’9 in the dataset for me to believe it’s accurate for tall people>>41334105she prob has highly developed lats
>>41332062yes obviously
>>41334156>It’s an estimate based on women with bmi under 20.Ok, so do you have data for underbust size by bmi that you can share? Or what is the estimate based on?
>>41334190this is from ansur 1, underbust is in mm
>>41334311That looks like underbust of 30 is completely within the expected range for a bmi of 19.75
>>41334156My point still standsYou kan pass with an underbust bigger than 30
