Cis women litteraly rioted and formed mass political movements for their right to fuck 100s of men out of wedlock and have the resultant bastard children sucked out of their wombs with vacuums and blended up into baby paste by abortion doctors but transwomen get depressed and just lie down and take it when retarded reality TV show zionists start fucking with them, why is this? You are merely asking to be treated with common courtesy and get some healthcare funding not mash up babies so you can keep fucking random men you've exchanged less than a paragraph worth of dating app messages with, it can't be that difficult.
>>41548212I think your tune on abortion would change real quick if you got a woman pregnant
>>41548219Im gay and women are demonic in nature so I refuse to associate with them, regardless my tune on blending up children so women can get cum pumped into them by random men wouldn't change if I were straight. Im not a zionist so I'm not really down with mass child slaughter.
>>41548260If you were raped by a woman and she got pregnant how would you feel?Most women are not pro-abortion because they want to use it as contraception, believe it or not. Abortions are incredibly unpleasant and have the chance of leaving you infertile, it's something you avoid at all costs. Hence why women usually cry when they learn of unintentional pregnancy.Seems like you have no relationships with women, it's kind of sad. You're missing out on 50% of the population
>>41548288If someone raped you would you immediately go out and blow a random babies brains out with a pistol? I wouldn't, that would be insane. The fact that the child is related to me or a product of a non consensual sexual encounter doesn't change that.
>>41548360Have you heard of the Violinist Argument? if not you should read it, what you're saying makes no sense as an analogy.If for example you woke up attached by IV to a baby that is relying on you for life support; would you have a responsibility to provide that life support for a full 9 months? What about if at the end of those 9 months, when they finally disconnected the baby, they also tore your crotch open while you were awake.Does your personal autonomy as the individual that awoke in this scenario against your will really not matter, at all?
>>41548399No it doesn't that's why we arrest and charge people when they allow their children to die from neglect. I don't think you should be allowed to stop feeding your child because it violates your personal autonomy, I don't think you should be allowed to blend up babies so you can continue to get pumped with cum by men you've exchanged less than 100 words with.
>>41548481>No it doesn'thaahahahahahahWhat you're saying doesn't make sense>charge people when they allow their children to die from neglect.you wouldn't charge a woman with neglect if she refused to feed herself until she miscarried, even in anti-choice states. The reason it's unethical to kill your living child is because it's a living being that experiences pain and distress. First trimester abortions are like a heavy period
>>41548481you're like not even interested in challenging yourself intellectually whatsoever i'm just realizing, bye, enjoy your night
>>41548596i'm not saying it's not a living being, i'm saying it's not a living being (that experiences pain and distress). You didn't address that part.Almost nobody is terminating developmental newborns, if a third, or even in most cases late second abortion is performed, it's almost always because the options are>baby dies>mother and baby die
>>41548649again, i'm not arguing about whether or not they're living beings. Most people would not disagree that the family of someone in a coma has the right to take them off life support if they could not bear the financial/situational/emotional burden any longer.
I should be allowed to switch off the life support of coma patients because they are costing me money and impacting my autonomy I didnt consent for them to be in a coma its basic foid ethics
>>41549074women should be kept in comas in a state of perpetual pregnancy
>>41549074>I should be allowed to switch off the life support of coma patients because they are costing me money and impacting my autonomythis is the prevailing ethical and medical standard essentially everywhere in the world you fucking retard
>>41549089Really? You can just go to the hospital and start unplugging the life support of random coma patients? How am I only just now hearing about this? Ive got some vegetables to microwave.
>>41549319Its legal and ethical
>>41549319that's not what i said at all. You keep like reading the first three words of what i say and then getting distracted by your own thoughts. I was saying that' it's a difficult decision made between medical staff and the family of the comatose individual, just like an abortionyou're being intentionally obtuse because you know you're wrong
>>41548509this fr and that applies to every single anti-abortionist
>>41549345You said im allowed to switch of the life support on somebody impacting my bodily autonomy and I pay alot of taxes derived from my physical labour to keep vegetables hooked up on life support therefore they are non consensually impacting my autonomy as I don't support public healthcare and thus I should be allowed to unplug them. This is how ethics works have you heard of the violinist argument?
>>41548212Least misogynistic fag lel
>>41548212you see, the key difference iswomen: prettytroons: uglythats how they get what they want
>>41548212>why does half of 1% of the adult population not form a mass movement capable of forcing concessions?>50% of the population did it and they managed to upgrade their lot in life from guaranteed domestic slavery to making domestic slavery merely the path of least resistance to themMuch like Jews in the Russian Empire, our only real hope is Bolshevism. We're never going to be able to outcompete the corpo propaganda designed to smear us and scapegoat us at scale. But since most of us statistically are proles or lumpenproles we can embed ourselves in the workers movement and make sure that we're well looked-after. Bullying libs into throwing us a bone also works short term, but long term capitalism is shit so if we're associated with libs we get stuck holding the bag for their idiotic corporate whore policies.
>>41548212That quote is cringe. Men could take away women's rights tomorrow, vice versa would be impossible, even laughable to think about.
>>41548212ciswomen would send you to war and piss on your grave if it meant they could fuck more, idk why men are considered gooners and coomers, everything ciswomen do revolves around getting to have more sex with no downsides
>>41552347men don't have any rights because of women
>>41552370Subconsciously, people view women as having less autonomy. Also, there's the phenomenon of the "women-are-wonderful effect." I, too, have these biases, as they're a feeling of some kind. Though, I know not to trust certain feelings. I feel like that's why a lot of people act the way they do: they don't actually think.
>>41552386I'm not sure I'd go that far. Though, it seems like women are more privileged than men, overall. Especially with these equity hiring practices.
>>41552431men are slaveswomen are gods
>blaming everyone except billionaires
>>41552436It's true that men are treated more expendable than women by society, but I feel like that's a vast oversimplification. Also, it seems like men are getting "red-pilled" about the hypocrisy we have in society. So maybe there'll be a cultural revolution of sorts. Lots of men are checking out of society. Which the hypocrisy is a bit annoying, as men get shit on, while women are seen as victims by "patriarchy" when one underperforms.
>>41552496> while women are seen as victims by "patriarchy" when one underperforms.i don't see this personally. Maybe for like, getting caught speeding, like you pull the "oh i just, i just didn't know!" but. Like almost all of the women i know experience intense performance pressure from their families and internally. in fact, the pattern i kind of notice is Responsible older sister that parents are hard on + irresponsible younger brother that parents spoil.Boys will be boys, remember?I think men are getting redpilled because their societal relationship with women has changed so significantly.Women used to not mate selectively, because you needed either a husband or a father to survive. Now, women can support themselves on their own, and in fact on average they're better off doing this while single. This means traits that women do not desire in men are being sexually selected against when mates are chosen, and many men are failing to adapt to this new role of having to bring something to the table outside of financial security
