>>41552793
kinda seems like she’s not upset over anything except the cost of it and the fact she can’t cum easily. im very okay with both of these things

>>41552793
she died in 1998 retard

>faketrooned after 3 marriages and fathering multiple children
>had srs when it was still shit
yeah you can safely disregard

>>41552816
The date of the archive isn't the date of the post itself retard
You know the internet existed in the 90's right

>>41552793
also see lynn conway's "srs warning" https://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Warning.html although note that she was (and I am) pro-srs

to be perfectly honest a lot of these seem like reaction to social stuff
>I know deep down that I'm a second-class woman.
>I miss my family and old friends
>she has suffered verbal and physical abuse since her sex swap operation
there's no direct quotes from samantha kane but note she is now mtftmtf

conway seems to conclude that there is a class of "fetishistic crossdressers" but I'm not sure it's not just trauma talking after decades of repression

>>41552869
what i'm saying is that it's not even remotely surprising to me that someone in the 90s who got srs in the 80s would be dissatisfied lol.

>>41552793
>DO NOT GET SRS
t. literally who c. 1990 something
uh okay? cool piece of history, not sure why it's relevant today

>sissy crossdressers shouldn't tranisition when they're 40 and have 10 kids
Wow incredible insights

>>41552793
>>41553002
this is the stuff of nightmares for young millennials in the late 90s and early 00s tbqh
definitely probs some pendulum swinging going on tbqh

>>41553021
yeah this is a nothingburger post. also the main gripes she raises are cost and no orgasms

I agree that SRS is a meme, and that orchi is probably better for mtfs in 90 whatever percent of cases, but the OP is literally, I mean literally, a crossdressing fetishist, and the fact that they weren't gatekept harder in the fucking 90s says a lot.

>>41553002
lynn conway's srs warning always stuck out to me because i got botched and it feels like she's calling me out specifically as trash lol. not like actually her fault just im projecting

>>41553156
if you had the resources (and would continue to have resources AFTER telling everyone you were a filthy tranny) to go find the right doctors it wasn't exactly hard to transition then but the gatekeeping was never about limiting transition to the right people. it was about enforcing subservience to the medical industry by making us repeat the arbitrary story they had decided was correct. the fact that the gatekeeping never actually filtered "people who would benefit from transition" provides this.

>>41552793
i dont understand. i want srs because i want genitalia that can properly connect with my future boyfriends. i dont understand what people like her is even saying

>>41553173
Yeah even though i was none of the things she warns about pre-op, like I was an early transitioner with all the right signs and estrogen made my "libidonous feelings" or whatever way better rather than killing them like she attributes to crossdressers, it makes me feel like having sexual issues or post-op regrets mean I was a fake tranny from the start lol

>>41553156
>gets rid of tissue needed for a good SRS result, makes you infertile AND keeps the penis
orchi is the real meme, all the downsides of SRS with none of the benefits

>>41553173
There is another wonderfully sad paragraph on her site https://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/SRS.html
>Note 1: Figure 10 [of the instructions to perform SRS] is quite misleading and does not correspond to the anatomy the should result from this procedure. In figure 10, the vaginal opening is way too far forward from the anal opening, and the vaginal entry is shown going first in horizontally and then turning upwards after passing a large web of skin in front of the anus. (Compare this sketch with the later photos of the details of modern SRS results, especially the one showing the entry of a vaginal stent into a postop's vagina). This very poorly conceived sketch has likely been the source of many botched surgeries in the early days, as surgeons copying the Hopkins procedure may have thought that a thick web of skin was needed in order to prevent tears into the rectum. Such webs of skin often prevented easy dilations and intercourse for patients after SRS, leading to vaginal stenosis (loss of depth and/or width).
I should note that in addition to describing the construction of a defective vagina there's also no bother creating the clitoris there. 1969 was one thing but the fact that there's still doctors nearly 60 years later doing surgery with similarly poor knowledge would be considered malpractice if it hurt anyone other than trannies.

>clickbait headline
Lol
>"it's expensive"
No it isn't, compared to literally anything else
>only if you are sure
Duh
>only if you kill yourself
Lmao no, only genital dysphoria is the criteria of relevance

And despite this, she isn't even bitter about srs
>1990
Jfc, srs must have been wild back then

Tldr:
I'm a happy clam haver, always will be, always will recommend it
Simple as

>>41553241
literally it fucking sucks

>>41553223
I had orchi and didn't get rid of the sack though?

>>41553342
yeah but it did get rid of the tunica and your sack will also shrink over time unless you're manually stretching it.

>>41553002
yeah as a post-op princess Id have to say my biggest problem has been other people. Surgery went fine, im really happy with it, but I've also had the thought that I'm considered a second class woman, no matter what my achievements or my personality or my looks Im always second to someone who has a uterus.

And if you are post-op you are basically a crypid. Honestly some people seem dissapointed when they find out im post op, and frankly its led me to be a bit bitter about humanity

>>41553403
genuine question are they disappointed by the fact that you're not a cis woman? (seems quite normal) or the fact that you got bottom surgery instead of having a peen? (weird 4chan chaser opinion)

>>41553368
But i want a tight pussy anyway ayyy
Idk what a tunica is though doesn't seem important

>>41553403
yeah but we're second class citizens before srs so it's not like that changes anything.

>>41553259
>No it isn't, compared to literally anything else
No I just compared it to the cost of a sandwich. The sandwich is much cheaper.
I’m not sure how you came to this ”literal” conclusion.

>>41553403
>Im always second to someone who has a uterus
it's not even that because the truth is that infertile women (regardless of whether that's born-without or removed or some functional problem) are given way way more social credit than we are allowed
>>41553422
they've internalized all the shit about us and rather than let their preconceived notions be challenged they lash out against us

>>41553422
dissapointed about not being a cis person duh.... that and dissapointed in having to deal with society that just endless asks me the same questions year after year. Have a pussy > having a penis

>>41553539
>how is having your penis cut off
>i just have a pussy now it's great
>oh that's not the answer i wanted

>>41553452
>sandwich
Arbys is expensive a f by now blud, inflation do be like that
Fr fr no cap

>>41552793
clearly agp

>>41553627
>deadbeat guys coming out of the bodega with a neopussy because it was cheaper than lunch

>>41552793
>gooner troons to goon harder
>gooning stops working
>disappointment ensues
Many such cases.

>>41553452
>No I just compared it to the cost of a sandwich. The sandwich is much cheaper.
well, i'm nta but my bottom surgery was literally free, so, actually the sandwich is not cheaper

>>41553822
I am disappointed in myself. This should've been:
>gooner trooned to goon her poon
>the poon wouldn't goon
>she was taken much too soon